By Lauren Dugan on November 30, 2013 10:00 AM
YP is looking for a Los Angeles: Editorial Contributors and Bloggers. next job 8 Inc. is looking for a Assistant Editor. next job Penton is looking for a Associate Content Producer. next job Monroe College is looking for a Social Medial and Public Relations Manager. next job McMurry/TMG is looking for a Business Technology Editor. next job YP is looking for a NYC: Editorial Contributors and Bloggers. next job Air Age Media is looking for a Editorial Manager. next job The New York Post is looking for a Sunday Features Photo Editor. see all
Posts Tagged ‘popular tweets’
Land your next big gig! Join us on January 27 at the Altman Building in New York City for an incredible opportunity to meet with hiring managers from the top New York media companies, network with other professionals and industry leaders, ad land your next job. Register now!
Over at the Twitter API announcements Google group, Twitter developer advocate Taylor Singletary has written about a beta project that their search team is working on that will rank results by popularity (as opposed to reverse-chronologically as they are now).
The Search team is working on a beta project that returns the most popularÂ tweets for a query, rather than only the most recent tweets. This is a betaÂ project, but an important first step to surface the most popular tweets forÂ users searching Twitter.
You can expect many improvements as we tune and tweak our algorithms, but weÂ want to give everyone a heads up so we can go over the implications forÂ those consuming the search API.
It’s unclear how exactly they are going to define what it is that classes a tweet as popular. People rarely click on individual tweets, so that metric isn’t going to work at all. My guess is it’s likely to be based heavily on retweets, perhaps held up against network size, which means that Justin Bieber is going to be your authority on everything.
For everybody’s sake, let’s hope they’re also working on an algorithm to counter that, too.
(Hat tip to Mashable.)