| Back to Home > Bulletin Board > TV News Corner > Topic: BBC accused of institutional 'trendyleft-wing bias |
Topic: BBC accused of institutional 'trendyleft-wing bias
| Author | Message |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/18/2007 7:19:07 PM | show profile The BBC is out of touch with large swathes of the public and is guity of self-censoring subjects that the corporation finds unpalatable, an official report has claimed. As part of the report's research the BBC's own controller of editorial policy admitted that people felt that the corporation was guilty of a "bias of omission" by not covering their views. Authors of the report called on the corporation to be more "open-minded" in the views it reflects and warned against "bias of elimination" which it branded "offensive". The report noted that the BBC had "come late" to several important stories in recent years, including Euroscepticism and immigration , which as it happens, were "off limits" in terms of a liberal-minded comfort zone". Research for the 80-page report showed that viewers were "frustrated" by political correctness at the BBC and feel the corporation is dominated by a London-centric bias, reflected in its programmes, presenters and coverage. The report, which was commissioned by the BBC and written by independent programme-maker John Bridcut, also warned that if the BBC's viewers did not feel that the corporation was reflecting their lives and attitudes people would lose faith in it. Their review hit out at programme-makers for misjudging where "cultural mainstream" opinion stood and for wanting to "swim" against popular opinion. Staff were told to avoid imposing their own liberal assumptions on the audience and told to "embrace a broader range of opinion". In the report, a news and current affairs producer recalled an instance where he had proposed a Newsnight investigation into the subject of "abortion on demand" but had been accused of being "anti-abortion" for even suggesting the idea which was not pursued. Roger Mosey, former head of television news at the BBC, now head of sport, is also quoted as saying the corporation displays "fairly overt support" for multiculturalism He also admitting having some sympathy with claims of a "liberal/pinko" agenda at times. He recalled a news item about ethnic communities becoming the majority in parts of east London, where a reporter had told him that they had "worked really hard" to find a white resident who was happy with the situation. |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/18/2007 7:20:01 PM | show profile The rest of the story Research in the review also found that even ethnic minorities felt that political correctness had gone to far and others said it was diluting comedy and entertainment at the broadcaster and complained of a "restrictive mind-set". Authors of the report called for a "periodic reality check" on shows like The Archers and Casualty as well as news programmes. The Archers has at times come under fire for losing its rural culture with increasingly metropolitan storylines. It suggested that the broadcaster had been late in picking up on "pavement politics" such as concern over the loss of weekly rubbish collections and had been "caught on the hop" by the success of UKIP in the 2004 elections. It warned of the dangers of an "institutional bias" in favour of stories generated by parliament rather than stories with populist roots. The report also urged the BBC not to "close down the debate" on climate change, despite the corporation admitting that it no longer felt it necessary to justify equal space being given to opponents of the consensus on the issue. The broadcaster's Oscar's coverage also came in for criticism over the presenters who were "transfixed by the glitz" in an "impartiality free zone' and called on the BBC to clamp down on its journalists becoming "opinion merchants ". It also faced claims of political correctness over Muslim terrorist suspects who were arrested last summer. One member of the public surveyed for the report claimed: "I think the BBC is too politically correct. The BBC were saying '21 men have been arrested' and I thought 'what's happening?' So I flicked over to Sky and it says '21 Asian men have been arrested." The report claims that the BBC's editorial advisory department and its recently formed College of Journalism need an extended role so that impartiality is addressed much earlier in the production process. It claims that impartiality should remain the "hallmark" of the BBC and said the balanced natureof its reporting was an "essential part" of the BBC's contract with its audience. The report singled out hit sitcom The Vicar Of Dibley and a season of programmes on Africa. An episode of The Vicar Of Dibley featured Dawn French promoting the Make Poverty History campaign. "The implication was that the cause was universal and uncontroversial, whereas the Make Poverty History website made clear that it had contentious political goals," the report said. Nowhere in the episode was it pointed out that the writer Richard Curtis was himself spearheading the campaign. The report also quoted a senior BBC executive as saying that impartiality in the Africa season was "as safe as a blood bank in the hands of Dracula". The report makes a series of 12 recommendations, or "guiding principles", which have been approved and adopted by the corporation. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23400983-details/BBC+accused+of+institutional+'trendy+left-wing+bias'/article.do |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/18/2007 10:02:13 PM | show profile weren't you sleeping in a worm hole - why did you crawl back out? |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/18/2007 10:17:46 PM | show profile What a shock!!! Jazz's fav network is a leftwing network. |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/18/2007 10:41:01 PM | show profile left is the best... right is pure fright... |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/19/2007 11:32:33 AM | show profile I had a liberal pouring of fine wine last night and a liberal portion of salad. |
| mailbag | Posted – 6/19/2007 12:24:07 PM | show profile | email poster In my view the BBC really got hit with the David Kelly story... that fiasco brought them down toppled executives and led to major funding cuts. I think the BBC intended to bring the government down (for Iraq) using the Kelly story and they failed. That said - let me ask this: Is the BBC really just fitting the makeup of the general audience in the UK... or is it (by itself) a so-called liberal news agency? Remember that, unlike here in the USA, residents there did not (and still do not) support the Iraq invasion, and they clearly define Bush as a gungy numbnut. I think the BBC acts accordingly...but more carefully than pre-Kelly. |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/19/2007 1:57:30 PM | show profile I think the BBC has greater insight and less propaganda in it's presentation. Up against FOX News it's like comparing truth to fiction. You don't having any retards like O'Reilly blathering opinions asking the public to accept as fact. |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/19/2007 4:32:54 PM | show profile "I think the BBC has greater insight and less propaganda in it's presentation. Up against FOX News it's like comparing truth to fiction. You don't having any retards like O'Reilly blathering opinions asking the public to accept as fact" Yeah you just have a bunch of leftwing poptards making up news and presenting it has fact. BBC is just like CNN. Who says theres no liberal media? |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/19/2007 5:10:52 PM | show profile one2three - I have to ask this - do you have a metal plate in your head. Let's pose another question.. are you really human or made up of patio tiles and pig snot? |
| noname1234 | Posted – 6/19/2007 5:14:00 PM | show profile one2 -- do you even understand the nature of the report you cited? It was an investigation of the BBC -- conducted by the BBC itself! It was an attempt by the corporation to look its own practices and make recommendations for how to improve them: "The report offers 12 new principles for the corporation to adopt to safeguard its impartiality.These include: ?Impartiality is no excuse for insipid programming. It allows room for fair-minded, evidence-based judgements by senior journalists and documentary-makers, and for controversial, passionate and polemical arguments by contributors and writers.? It sounds to me like this was a pretty honorable thing -- trying to openly acknowledge your weaknesses and how you're going to improve upon them. Isn't this a reasonable example of the greater transparency that many are calling for in contemporary journalism? |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/19/2007 5:49:16 PM | show profile none of this matters - this is all a game for one2three to inflame and hurl insults at the scary people - liberals. It's just nonsense. |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/19/2007 6:57:04 PM | show profile s is all a game for one2three to inflame and hurl insults Awwww the pot calls the kettle black. |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/19/2007 6:59:07 PM | show profile one2 -- do you even understand the nature of the report you cited? Yes i do. Do you?? |
| One2Three | Posted – 6/19/2007 7:00:03 PM | show profile one2three - I have to ask this - do you have a metal plate in your head. Jazz i thought you was the old fart with the metal plate. |
| Iron Eagle | Posted – 6/19/2007 7:55:21 PM | show profile one2 - I'm on the mark - the plate's made of Lada parts. |
