Topic: Fixing CNN's American Morning

1–23 out of 23 messages
Author Message
soulman Posted – 12/16/2007 2:00:07 PM | show profile
I thought the team of Chetry/Roberts was going to destroy the ratings of FOX & Friends, but unfortunately it hasn't materialized yet. A new set and different hosts is needed. Have a more casual set, with a couch or comfy looking chairs. My dream team of hosts would consist of Chetry, Jeff Toobin, Rick Sanchez and maybe Soledad O'Brien. This team would be a great liberal antidote to the right wing nutjobs on FOX in the mornings. CNN is the most trusted name in news and tells the truth, and it's a shame to see those amatuer clowns over at right wing news network pulling in more viewers.
JIMBO99 Posted – 12/16/2007 2:55:27 PM | show profile
Yep Lib....
It's just a damn shame to see viewers voting with thier remote control....damn that democracy anyway...let's hope that dosen't catch on .....huh Lib!
soulman Posted – 12/16/2007 3:23:01 PM | show profile
CNN rules!
Jimbo, Democracy is a great thing, but the fact that so many people are watching that Bush network is disturbing to say the least. Those viewers just want untrue and unrealistic news read to them by some bimbo. CNN has real journalists who know the truth and speak it. I was so jazzed when Kiran Chetry wised up and left the right wing Christian network for a channel that truly represents America, and that is CNN. I love how she went right to work at her favorite news station the day after she slammed the door on FOX News! I wonder if others at FOX have the guts to do the same? Kiran was longing for CNN, and I have to guess that she isn't the only one who wants to work where the truth about Republicans and conservatives can be told. CNN has integrity and standards. FOX doesn't even know what those two words mean.
soulman Posted – 12/16/2007 5:52:53 PM | show profile
I'm not Jon Klein
If I were, I'd be out golfing or whatever it is rich people do on weekends.

AM could be a winner on CNN. They need to put Soledad back on with Kiran and add Jeff Toobin and Rick Sanchez. They all have great personalities and strong liberal viewpoints as well. The fact is, people like opinion thrown in with their news, and CNN doesn't do enough of it. Liberals are a majority in this nation, and so CNN can capitalize on a huge market out there.
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/16/2007 6:42:33 PM | show profile
There's a big shift towards liberalism. Fascisim is toxic. Gomer Huckabee will be the next defeated Rapuke. Get ready for eight years of Democratic rule. We will be leaving the dark ages behind.
Olbypocrisy Posted – 12/16/2007 8:30:51 PM | show profile
liberalism=Fascisim
Nikongirl Posted – 12/16/2007 8:39:28 PM | show profile
Obly will just stop with the idiotic Liberal=facism. That is too stupid, even for you. Rise above for once will you.
Olbypocrisy Posted – 12/16/2007 9:36:53 PM | show profile
Liberalism=facism

please get it right before you tell me to stop
stvj57 Posted – 12/16/2007 9:48:54 PM | show profile
Get ready for eight years of Democratic rule.
only eight years crimedump? no cnfidence in the longterm succsess of your party?

They all have great personalities and strong liberal viewpoints as well.
so soloman, you are saying that cnn needs to be more liberal in order to take on fox? fine by me, i would love to see you battling for more of msnbc's viewers.
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/16/2007 10:28:14 PM | show profile
Get ready for eight years of solid Democratic rule! Break out the mineral water tuck away the river swill. Liberals will fill every corner of the universe. Consider it like walking into the promise land. Ding dong the fascists are dead!
soulman Posted – 12/16/2007 10:40:04 PM | show profile
CNN is a much more established network than MSNBC is, and a more laid back, openly liberal type of program would do very well against the right wingers over at FOX. CNN is seen everywhere, from airports to doctor's office waiting rooms. The morning program would be a big hit if they'd let Chetry beat up on her former employer. If anyone knows of the right wing pressure tactics at FOX, it would be her it seems. One thing is certain. They've got to bring Rick Sanchez back to the morning show. He's fantastic! What energy!
stvj57 Posted – 12/18/2007 12:52:33 AM | show profile
liberal tv wars
like i said soulman feel free to go as lib as you want. i would love to see you fight for ratings with msnbc. by the way cnn is not see in enough offices or it would have better ratings. also miss chetry is loosing viewers compared to when she was at fox. fox is the most viewed cable news network. if you pulled your head out of her ass you would see how absurd your comments are as well as how disrespectfull of kiran who in my opinion was very professional on fox.
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/18/2007 2:47:46 AM | show profile
Fox isn't news half wit stv - it's infortainment. Even the courts view it that way. It's bad comedy like Dennis Miller.
stvj57 Posted – 12/18/2007 5:21:42 PM | show profile
It's bad comedy like Dennis Miller.

or bad jokes like crimelord.
soulman Posted – 12/18/2007 6:42:35 PM | show profile
I was disrespectful?
stvj57, Are you saying that I am being disrespectful to Kiran? What did I say? She's the best there is and a huge asset to CNN.
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/18/2007 6:50:51 PM | show profile
Fox is comedy stv... learn to laugh at the big joke.
jenny b good Posted – 12/18/2007 9:43:18 PM | show profile
John Roberts is not a morning anchor. when i look at him i see dan rather trying to be cheery. kiran needs rob marciano jack cafferty and lisa bloom... and a set that shows off the time warner location over central park & the nyc skyline.
stvj57 Posted – 12/19/2007 2:45:40 AM | show profile
laughing all the way to the bank crimedork
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/19/2007 10:21:45 AM | show profile
stv - I realize you're not the brightest blub in the laundry room but once again Fox isn't the real deal - it's infotainment just like that Pocket Fisherman from years gone by and those rubber soxs you bought from the Shopping Newtwork for your grandmother. Brian Williams has the big numbers on an authentic news broadcast. The stuff you're drooling over is for idiots like you who can't tell the difference who get jacked over Paris Hilton's sweat glands and O'Reilly's asshole.
Olbypocrisy Posted – 12/19/2007 10:33:23 AM | show profile
crimedog loves licking O'Reilly's asshole
stvj57 Posted – 12/19/2007 2:41:42 PM | show profile
copied from a post above.

jenny b good Posted ? 12/18/2007 9:43:18 PM | show profile
John Roberts is not a morning anchor. when i look at him i see dan rather trying to be cheery. kiran needs rob marciano jack cafferty and lisa bloom... and a set that shows off the time warner location over central park & the nyc skyline.


so, you are saying that american morning needs to change it's look rather than it's content to gain viewers? you are saying that folks are going to watch it more for asthetics than the information? when kiran was at fox people were saying the only reason fox and friends beat cnn in that time slot was because folks were watching kiran's soft porn. well now she is at cnn and you are still finding fault with it.
jenny b good Posted – 12/19/2007 4:12:14 PM | show profile
no. i said it needs to change its anchor team to gain more viewers. but aesthetics are important too. the today show took off after making its rockefeller plaza location part of the set and a mecca for fans.
stvj57 Posted – 12/20/2007 12:46:55 AM | show profile
Jenny, why don?t they just give people news, stories and a bit of entertainment that they want instead of what THEY THINK they want? That is the ?secret? behind fnc and other successful networks. Not trying to slam cnn but for a long time they were the only game in town so they didn?t have to make folks happy or pay too much attention to what folks wanted to view. They just fed what they wanted. Now things have changed. Before fnc people who did not agree with cnn?s views had no where else to go. cnn can no longer be good just because they are there. Cnn and msnbc are driving folks away that do not agree with them. While folks may not agree all the time with what they get on fnc, at least fnc is not driving the middle of the road folks away. People say that fnc gets ratings because of fancy graphics and such. Well a lot of people have fnc on in the back ground and listen to it more than watch. Same for cnn. It seems that more people at this time prefer what they HEAR on fnc. A lot of people who tuned into cnn for years have turned to fnc because they like the way the news is presented to them, meaning fnc for the most part does not ram their views down viewers throat 24 hrs a day. Yes fnc does have different views than cnn, but you are not being force fed and you feel they for the most part are just laying things out for you and if you want another opinion just go look for it and make up your own mind. I must say that msnbc is far worse than cnn as far as cramming views down your throat. Cnn may not be as bad as they used to be in that department. I got off the topic of A.M. but it is the same thing. It is true that fnc and cnn approach things different as well as msnbc. The bigger network morning shows approach things differently again. Fnc knows the audience it is going after. Cnn is still stuck on why can?t they draw the same viewers any more and msnbc is going after the viewers that cnn is loosing because they are not left enough. A lot of people watch cnn just because they always have and they think there is no reason to change. I feel more folks tune into fnc because they are not as turned off by what they find. Maybe they don?t like fnc more. Maybe they just hate it less. Lol.
1–23 out of 23 messages