Back to Home > Bulletin Board > TV News Corner > Topic: CBS' Primary Question Tonight Sure To Make A Few S

Topic: CBS' Primary Question Tonight Sure To Make A Few S

1–11 out of 11 messages
Author Message
TV Colleague Posted – 12/19/2007 6:31:50 PM | show profile
TV Newser - you've stooped to a new low quoting the National Enquirer as a source for a news story. What ever happened to basic journalism 101?
Olbypocrisy Posted – 12/19/2007 9:03:33 PM | show profile
TVNewser uses MSNBC and liberal hate sites for sources all the time.

The Enquirer is a step up !!!
TV Colleague Posted – 12/19/2007 10:16:37 PM | show profile
CBS' Primary Question Tonight Sure To Make A Few Squirm
Frank - and that justifies use????
Just Askin'
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/19/2007 10:34:47 PM | show profile
Frank reads the good shit. This is where he forms those astute opinions.
ManhattanMatt Posted – 12/19/2007 10:40:07 PM | show profile
Voice from the mainstream media ...
You're not hearing it from us because until we have more solid sources, we're not about to open ourselves up to a MAJOR lawsuit.
Iron Eagle Posted – 12/20/2007 12:14:22 AM | show profile
You heard the Clinton lies about the child and Vince Foster from Fox News - Drudge - Wingnuts Hate - every copy of yellow journalism financed by Richard Scaife. You guys haven't the slighest inclination to find reliable publications it's always hate wipe.
stvj57 Posted – 12/20/2007 12:57:05 AM | show profile
what did i miss. what are you guys talking about? sorry i really just don't know.
stvj57 Posted – 12/20/2007 2:02:02 PM | show profile
don't everyone respond all at once here.
rockyroad Posted – 12/20/2007 4:11:03 PM | show profile
I don't care of Edwards but this story is just wrong. If true, it's between him and his wife. This has nothing to do with how he would govern. It's time to take the personal crap out of politics. Let Edwards be.
TV Colleague Posted – 12/20/2007 4:42:46 PM | show profile
CBS' Primary Question Tonight Sure To Make A Few Squirm
Agreed Rocky Road, which was why I was stunned that TV Newser would refer to this story from the National Enquirer. When I saw the source as the National Enquirer, well, I was even more stunned this site would even consider using it as a source.
Is there no serious fact checking - at all, even a call to the candidate's office in Chapel Hill before such a post is linked? This is a serious allegation. While blogging may live in its own world, it does have a responsibility not to damage reputations without serious discourse with the party or use true sources of solid journalistic reputation. This site just posted it and I was extremely surprised at their journalism standards would include a publication such as the Enquirer.
stvj57 Posted – 12/20/2007 6:21:13 PM | show profile
if you folks that are saying this story has no place in the election news, then what about rudy and his personal stuff?

if mitt was found to have a love child you would be all over it is my guess. what is good for the goose is good for the gooser. lol.
1–11 out of 11 messages