Topic: U.S. ranked lowest on privacy protection

1–2 out of 2 messages
Author Message
Stanley_Milgram Posted – 12/30/2007 7:43:40 PM | show profile
Speaking of stories that won't make the MSM anytime soon. The international privacy rights group, Privacy International issued its 2007, giving the U.S. it's lowest ranking, "endemic surveillance state," an honor it shares with Russia, China and the U.K.

Land of the free, huh?

Link here:

http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-559597

Excerpts here:

* No right to privacy in constitution, though search and seizure protections exist in 4th Amendment; case law on government searches has considered new technology
* No comprehensive privacy law, many sectoral laws; though tort of privacy
* FTC continues to give inadequate attention to privacy issues, though issued self-regulating privacy guidelines on advertising in 2007
* State-level data breach legislation has proven to be useful in identifying faults in security
* REAL-ID and biometric identification programs continue to spread without adequate oversight, research, and funding structures
* Extensive data-sharing programs across federal government and with private sector
* Spreading use of CCTV
* Congress approved presidential program of spying on foreign communications over U.S. networks, e.g. Gmail, Hotmail, etc.; and now considering immunity for telephone companies, while government claims secrecy, thus barring any legal action
* No data retention law as yet, but equally no data protection law
* World leading in border surveillance, mandating trans-border data flows
* Weak protections of financial and medical privacy; plans spread for 'rings of steel' around cities to monitor movements of individuals
* Democratic safeguards tend to be strong but new Congress and political dynamics show that immigration and terrorism continue to leave politicians scared and without principle
* Lack of action on data breach legislation on the federal level while REAL-ID is still compelled upon states has shown that states can make informed decisions
* Recent news regarding FBI biometric database raises particular concerns as this could lead to the largest database of biometrics around the world that is not protected by strong privacy law
UGoGirl Posted – 1/1/2008 11:19:27 AM | show profile
This is probably one of the best reasons why we need a Democratic white house.
1–2 out of 2 messages