| Back to Home > Bulletin Board > Current Events > Topic: Clinton Made Love - Bush Made Death! |
Topic: Clinton Made Love - Bush Made Death!
| Author | Message |
| crimedog | Posted – 1/28/2008 8:08:24 PM | show profile Once again for those fixated on Bill Clinton's tryst with Monica. Nothing compares to the loss of life Bush has brought to the world. 150,000 Iraqis dead nearly 4,000 American servicemen. Isn't time to put this man on trial? |
| JCB | Posted – 1/28/2008 8:26:05 PM | show profile The two aren't mutually exclusive. You can dislike both men for different reasons. Clinton is a sexist slimebag who mistreated many women. (Has everyone forgotten Juanita Broderick, who accused him of rape, and all of the molestation and harassment charges? Oh, yeah, of course, they were all "crazy bitches" who were lying, right?) He abused his power to take advantage of a much-younger intern who was under his authority. Excuse me for not granting a thumbs-up to all that because Bush decided to invade Iraq. |
| crimedog | Posted – 1/28/2008 8:43:13 PM | show profile JCB - accusations are one thing proof another. Remember, Richard Melon Scaife put up $10,000,000 to destroy the man and paid for Paula Jones nose job. I'm glad the Clintons are taking a beating after the past two weeks but as far as his girl chasing past - that's something all these guys do. Scaife just got caught with a mistress and his wife is bringing the hammer. What Bush did is throw lives away and send others to kill. This is a criminal act. This far exceeds the acts of a skirt chaser. Have you ever been around these Southern men? It's hilarious! Women are big game to them. Clinton's just like the rest - no different. |
| JCB | Posted – 1/28/2008 9:08:37 PM | show profile That's a disgusting attitude. Of course feminist issues take a backseat to "real" ("men's") issues. We're not talking about "skirt chasing" here, and that cavalier boys-will-be-boys attitude really belongs back in the '90s (it belongs NOWHERE, actually). But as I said, no one is equating Bush's crimes with Clinton's misdeeds. You can hate both. And really, that whole attitude toward women's allegations of misconduct just opens a huge can of worms that I don't want to revisit. It was horrible enough in the '90s seeing all of the so-called feminists rallying behind Clinton when they had savaged Clarence Thomas after he had been accused of far less than Clinton had. Really disgusting. |
| crimedog | Posted – 1/28/2008 9:16:37 PM | show profile JCB - you can't prosecute a man with innuendo. There's nothing out there saying this man forced himself on anyone. It's evident the guy was using his position to collect women. Believe me there are plenty women who would have gladly slept with this man just for bragging rights. If he had committed those acts he would have never been president. This guy was run through a fine tooth comb and there was $10,000,000 spent to find everything imaginable. This guy didn't have the money to counter all the accusations - in fact the Clintons weren't wealthy people. That's recent history. I grew up in the South around these types and all they had to do was show some young woman a bit of attention and they could easily smooth talk them into bed. That's not sexist - that's the game. |
| JCB | Posted – 1/28/2008 10:36:28 PM | show profile You obviously are not familiar with the facts. You buy into the whole victim mythology. Do some research. I'm tired of the topic. I don't know how old you are, and maybe you're too young to have been fully aware of the events while they were happening. But I refuse to rehash all of the old there's-no-proof arguments of yesteryear. Did you not get my Clarence Thomas reference? But I won't argue about this. I'm so weary of battling brainwashed, mesmerised Clintonphiles. |
| crimedog | Posted – 1/28/2008 11:43:56 PM | show profile JCB - what the hell are you talking about? I'm not a Clinton fan. He did a decent job as president and withstood a $10,000,000 war chest. Clarence Thomas? Here's a guy who should have never been a supreme court justice. I just reminded you, you can't proscecute Clinton over an allegation. No person has been investigated as much is this man. If there were even a lick of truth to what you say the right-wing fantasy core would have severed his head years ago. Now, get so much needed sleep. |
| keltoi | Posted – 1/29/2008 1:34:26 AM | show profile They impeached Clinton and Nixon for far, far less than what Bush has done. |
| Stanley_Milgram | Posted – 1/29/2008 12:09:46 PM | show profile "He abused his power to take advantage of a much-younger intern who was under his authority." Oh yawn. Was Monica Lewinksy above 18 years old or wasn't she? Adults either are trusted to make responsible decisions or they aren't. It's you who's making her out to be a victim. She flashed her thong, fooled around in the oval office and wrote love letters. It sounded rather sweet, frankly (yes, I read the Starr Report. Have you?). If the crazy (ugly?) bitches (Linda Tripp, Lucianne Goldberg) didn't splash the cumstains all over the front page, Monica would have gone on with her life and probably had cherished memories of her hot tryst with the President. You're some kind of bitter anti-sex feminist if you think otherwise. |
| crimedog | Posted – 1/29/2008 1:21:03 PM | show profile you nailed Stanley! |
| jazzreport | Posted – 1/29/2008 2:13:22 PM | show profile Can't hate on Bill Connor Bill Clinton should be called "Bill Connor" from now on.[blaming all those black people for his wife's loss in S.C.] Can't hate on Bill Connor for the abuse of power,or the double standards . Bill Connor helped men all over the country who feared or was charged with sexual harassment . See the Judge's remarks in the Seinfeld lawsuit. crimedog please stop talking about how people tried to take Clinton out. Soros and other rich Dem's spented billions on trying to take Bush out. |
