| Back to Home > Bulletin Board > TV News Corner > Topic: Dan Abrams- VERDICT: HIPOCRISY! |
Topic: Dan Abrams- VERDICT: HIPOCRISY!
| Author | Message |
| thevertman | Posted – 4/26/2008 10:04:08 PM | show profile Now Newsbusters is a real fine site to draw information from. They're only slightly more reliable than Fox themselves. Obama though is an idiot for appearing on the now marginalized supposed NEWS network. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/26/2008 10:36:54 PM | show profile Hey Ron, are you looking in a mirror or just remembering your ho mama or your dirtbag daddy? You are all three clearly have a joint IQ in single digits. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/26/2008 10:42:19 PM | show profile >>This comes from someone with a low IQ". That comes from a bonehead racist turd conservative who can't spell hypocrisy even though he was raised in it and spouts it with every word. Oh, and thinks it requires a "spellcheck" to know how to spell it. Spell that p-a-t-h-e-t-i-c. |
| MainStreetUSA | Posted – 4/27/2008 12:49:50 AM | show profile Target I knew Dan Abrams would be the next target of the right wing political hacks who can't take the opposing view. Why in the world would you care if Dan thinks Obama shouldn't go on Fox because Fox has lied about him and been incredibily biased about him? Dan is a commentator, hes allowed to say whatever he wants to say. I never hear News Busters come out and disect O'Reilly or Hannity's every word. What about the fact that Rush Limbaugh called for people to riot during the democratic convention in Colorado? Haven't heard News Busters come out and bust that one. I guess they only bust somebody when its a commentator that leans democratic. Thats the difference between progressives and the right wing hacks. We have an argument. We know its the best argument. Therefore, whatever the right wingers have to say, can't hurt us. The right wingers: do not have an argument and therefore, if anybody gives an opinion that may lean democratic, they can't candle it and they go crazy and they send the News Busters after them. |
| MainStreetUSA | Posted – 4/27/2008 10:24:01 AM | show profile Who are your liberal commentators? "Can't the left E-V-E-R see its own biases while they're attacking the right?!?" Thats absolutely rediculous - is the media not allowed to have liberal commentators on the air? Of course they can see their own biases because they are giving their opinions. I suppose you could say that liberal commentators attack the right. Thats their Constitutionally protected opinion to do so. Ring wing commentators can also see their own biases when they attack the left. I don't hear you complaining about the fact that 7 of 8 Fox News anchors from 4PM-10PM are right wingers and have their own programs to opine everynight, all under the "fair and balanced" banner. You don't like Dan because he leans democratic in his analysis. Its the same reason you don't like Keith. Forget the fact that MSNBC has Joe Scarborough, a right winger who served in Congress on for 6 hours a day! Fox News serves up a rediculous plate of guests and Fox News liberal analysts who are the weakest liberals I have ever seen in my life. These people have never felt passionate about anything a day in their life. Its always a Mary AnnMarsh or Juan Williams or Mara Liason up against a powerful super player like Karl Rove (although usually Karl Rove gets his own segments and is allowed to go unchallenged). The ring wing guests on MSNBC are just as passionate, just as strong, and have just as good of arguments as the progressives. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 11:51:43 AM | show profile Mainstreet wrote: >>Thats absolutely rediculous - is the media not allowed to have liberal commentators on the air? Of course they can see their own biases because they are giving their opinions. I suppose you could say that liberal commentators attack the right. Thats their Constitutionally protected opinion to do so.<< So true, along with the fact that in one breath they only complain about bias when it's not their own. This shows the lie from such people that they want "civilized discussion" or "debate" on any network or anywhere else when they're the ones that support the elimination of that Constitution. What their words only ever prove is what they really want is a right-wing authoritarian state with absolutely no bias/opinion allowed except their own. A true All-American Fourth Reich. And you in a death camp. Make no mistake about it. |
| thevertman | Posted – 4/27/2008 3:32:57 PM | show profile More crap from frank... Actually according to the latest ratings numbers posted on this very site. Fox News is 8th among all cable channels. Not 3rd. 8th. I posted this before but as always some people just keep repeating the same garbage over and over regardless of whether it's true or not. |
| thevertman | Posted – 4/27/2008 3:43:09 PM | show profile No commentary. Just the ratings from April 7 to 13th. Fox is 8th iin primetime. 11th in total day. Feel free to post more current numbers if anyone has them. http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/original/Cable%20Time%20Period%20Ranker%20(LIVESD)%20-%20Week%20of%2004-07-08.pdf |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 5:08:04 PM | show profile lol lol lol There's only so many ways Frankie can summarize himself and his family. He's actually proud of all those things about himself and who he is, that's why he keeps repeating them. In not very creative ways. It's all a conservative ever has to show for themselves. Aside from their mental midgetry and shoddy spelling. lol |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 5:17:26 PM | show profile anovelfate - refer back to the original post by MainStreet instead of being disingenuous. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 5:20:52 PM | show profile Oh and Anovelfate? You still haven't answered my own question: so you call this a thoughtful response?: >>You mean the brainless whiny hysterical libs that say everything is Bush's fault?<< Along with other instant attacks by FrankLobo. Sorry you can't see what's over the edge and what's answering the edge rightly. Maybe you're just too used to their type of craziness. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 6:07:36 PM | show profile I have no idea about what you're reading into that's not there. Since you already reached a conclusion why ask a question? "That" refers to the constitution that was already referred to by the previous person I quoted. Try not to make too much of too little. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 6:24:11 PM | show profile Her printer survived your genuine anti-woman/anti-gay/profane slurs for months. That's why she wasn't addressing you. |
| oceanvue | Posted – 4/27/2008 10:15:10 PM | show profile I hate to tell you, but you're not even making sense or answering or conversing yourself. You were told once already that there was no particular significance in my use of the word "that". What a weird fixation, and even weirder that you go on making a mountain out of a molehill. If you prefer, I can say "THE" constitution and mean the same thing if it is such a momentous issue in your mind however. How about that? I hope it makes your evening. As to the rest of your stuff about gender or courtesy it's making even less sense so I won't bother with it other than to note "Pot Black". |
| vburn1979 | Posted – 5/23/2008 4:32:28 PM | show profile Fox News Bias? Olbermann is the Gold Standard for Bias. I find it very interesting how those on the left side of the aisle are always complaining about the Conservative Bias at Fox News. If you watch the opinion shows on Fox they always have commentators from both the right and the left. The regular networks do not tend to show both sides. Some facts for your consideration: Bill Moyers (PBS): Was affiliated with the Johnson Administration (Democrat) Chris Matthews (MSNBC) Was affiliated with Tip O'Neill (Democrat), the House Speaker during the Reagan Administration. George Stephanopoulos (ABC) was affiliated with the Clinton Administration These Correspondents/Analysts are likely biased considering their previous affiliations. The most blatantly biased Correspondent is Keith Olbermann on MSNBC. I am unsure of Keith Olbermann's past political experience but I have watched his show on several occasions and find myself continually amazed that he is still on the air. This is not a news show but the ravings of a rabid leftist. He is very emotional and vocal but does not back up his assertions with any verifiable facts. I watched his show last night (5/22/8) and was amazed about one particular segment where he was quoting a Muslim FBI agent who resigned from the agency complaining about the way the agency handles Homeland Security. During his whole tirade he kept quoting this FBI agent's accusations against the agency but did not seem to want to do any type of investigative reporting to verify the accusations. What type of Journalism is this, quoting someone's statements as Gospel and making that the basis of his report. Anybody can say anything against their previous employer, this does not necessarily mean that the accusations are true. This show is very Sophomoric, I have seen better Journalism skills demonstrated in a High School Newspaper. |
