![]() |
||
McCann Worldgroup is looking for a Interactive Media Planner. See all other great jobs at our Job Board.
Monday Aug 29, 2005
A modest celebrity proposalMichael Hiltzik takes a sharp look at the recent legislation proposed by state assemblywoman Cindy Montanez to allow anyone (celebrity or civilian) to file suit against a paparazzo who "creates... a reasonable apprehension of offensive or harmful contact" in trying to get a candid celeb shot. Since (obviously) assault is already a crime, this law would allow celebrities to sue photographers even if their actions don't meet the standards for criminal charges. Of course, this law would lead to an increased burden on our already over-taxed court system. So why not ask celebrities to fund it? Ultimately it is they who reap the benefits of the cultural production system which makes their photographs a commodity. Hiltzik thus proposes license fees for celebrityhood: The California Celebrity Protection Act would state that any individual who has been the subject of three or more items in People, Us Weekly, the New York Post's Page Six, or OK! Magazine over any six-week span must apply for and receive a state celebrity license before appearing in public. The fee would be $5,000, unless any of the articles was a cover story, in which case it would be $15,000. Two cover stories - $25,000, and so on. Sounds good to me! Email This Post |
||