Did Television Overdo Its Coverage of Tim Russert’s Death?

Over at Slate Jack Shafer is wondering whether the coverage of Tim Russert‘s death had been taken a bit too far.

I have nothing against Tim Russert. He hosted two decent programs…and ably helmed NBC News’ Washington bureau. According to his colleagues and competitors, he was a conscientious journalist and a fine leader. He was said by all to be a good husband, father, and son…What has possessed NBC News to televise a never-ending video wake? Almost nothing aired contained much in the way of news. After reporting his passing and a postmortem by his physician, nearly every minute of NBC and MSNBC coverage tried to convey the loss felt by his peers…They loved him. They admired him. He was their mentor. He raised the bar for all journalists. He was thoughtful. He was kind. Of the highest integrity. Generous. Loyal. And so on. Just because it’s true doesn’t make it news.

We sort of have to agree with homeboy Shafer, and imagine that in the coming weeks more people will be debating whether the coverage of Russert was excessive and if the decision to devote so much time to it an objective one. In the meantime what say you? Too much or just right? Cast your vote after the jump.

Do You Think the Coverage of Tim Russert’s Death Was Excessive?
( polls)

Create a social media strategy, launch your campaign, and track the results in our Social Media Marketing Boot Camp starting February 16. The online event and workshop will feature speakers including The Onion‘s Baratunde Thurston (left), Facebook’s Morin Oluwole, and bitly’s Tim Devane. Register now.