FishbowlDC FishbowlLA TVNewser TVSpy SocialTimes LostRemote MediaJobsDaily more GalleyCat AppNewser UnBeige AgencySpy PRNewser 10,000 Words AllFacebook AllTwitter semanticweb.com
Magazines

Magazines at the Break: So Not Jane

By Dylan on July 12, 2006 7:00 AM

magazines_newsstand_2006.jpg

The first half advertising numbers for consumer magazines are in, and according to the Publishers Information Bureau — the Magazine Publishers of America arm that tracks this sort of stuff — overall revenue is up about 1% but ad pages — typically the better gauge of the industry’s health — are off 1.7 percent.

More interesting to us, though, are the performances of selected individual titles, and what it means for their editors:

  • ElleGirl performed until the bitter end, up nearly 20% in ad pages and 50% in revenue to $19.1 million.
  • Brandon Holley-led Jane is down 41% in ad pages — some 150 fewer — and 36.6% in revenue to $15.2 million (about $9 million less). So not Jane.
  • Martha Stewart‘s post-penitentiary ass-kicking continues, as Living is up 75% in ad pages (586 vs. 336 last year) and 92% in revenue to $74 million — roughly $35 million more than it pulled in over the same period last year.

  • In the battle for New York, Adam Moss‘ New York has run 15.9% more pages of ads than the first half of 2005, totaling $95.86 million, a 23.9% gain. The New Yorker is down 17.6% in ad pages (833, over 170 less than last year’s first half) and about a 10 percent in revenue ($86.9 million) — though editor David Remnick always has the option of eBaying his trophy case to make up the difference in cash.
  • Along the Men’s Fitness-Health-Journal continuum, Men’s Health stumbled (-10.8% in revenue, -16.0% in ad pages) while its counterparts posted gains.
  • The Andy Pemberton Spin era resulted, at least in part, in a 17% drop in ad pages and 20% dip in revenue (to $11.8 million). Blender spun its 5 percent increase in ad pages into a 28.7% boost in revenue.
  • Despite the hype surrounding its 1000th issue, Rolling Stone‘s ad pages were down 12%, though its $90 million in ad revenue is just $2 million off of its 2005 pace.
  • Despite a shakeup at the top, Time magazine posted revenue (10%) and ad page (6.7%) gains as part of its $295,825,182 in PIB ad revenue.
  • Portfolio‘s future competition: Fast Company (-25% in ad pages, -21.5% in revenue); Inc. (-5.7%, -3.2%); Fortune (-3%, flat); Money (-9.7%, -5.4%); SmartMoney (-1.2%, +5.6%).
  • Bonnie Fuller‘s Star saw an 11.5% increase in ad pages and 33.6% in revenue, a gain $18 million — just enough to cover Fuller’s rider agreement.
  • Vanity Fair‘s dip (11.4% in revenue to $103 million, 15.3% in ad pages) may make Graydon Carter think twice about running more awkward Tom Ford covers.
  • TV Guide‘s shark-jumping was not exactly exaggerated. The magazine’s new format resulted in $100 million less in advertising revenue and 550 less ad pages.

    • RELATED:

    Comments
    Share
    Mediabistro Event

    “Vine: Create Quick Social Video to Market Your Brand” Webcast

    Bring your Twitter efforts and information to life with this popular video app. Find out how in our Vine webcast taking place tomorrow, June 19 from 4-5 pm ET. Gemma Craven (left), EVP, New York group director of Social@Ogilvy, will discuss how her team has created interactive videos for brands to get their message heard. Register today.