<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/common_v4/xsl/content.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
	>

<channel>
<title>Browse GalleyCat May 2006 archives - GalleyCat</title>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat</link>
<description>The First Word On the Book Publishing Industry</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<atom:link href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/date/2006/05/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>

<item>
<title>Taking Sci-Fi Seriously</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already become conventional wisdom among science fiction pros and fans that <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/publishing/outtakes_from_this_weeks_pw_cover_story_34710.asp">the <i>NYTBR</i> sci-fi column stinks</a>, even though detractors have only ever heard one example upon which to base their judgments. By contrast, the <i>Washington Post</i> book reviewers have been held up as a model for taking science fiction seriously not just as pop culture ephemera, but as literature capable of significant creative expression&#8212;and for being willing to grapple with such expressions on their own, occasionally quite technical, terms instead of flailing about in &#8220;math is hard&#8221; frustration. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501339.html">The sci-fi reviews in last Sunday&#8217;s <i>Book World</i></a> offer a clear example of what it is that impresses those who value <i>WaPo</i> over <i>NYTBR</i> in this field.</p>
<p>Before <b>Martin Morse Wooster</b> begins discussing <b>Ian McDonald&#8217;s</b> <i>River of Gods</i> (which is sitting on my coffee table, constantly trying to seduce me into blowing off all my freelance assignments and devoting myself to it), he discusses his belief that most SF writers, having fumbled the short-term prediction game, have moved on in other directions&#8230;but not McDonald, whose novel is heralded for &#8220;deftly show[ing] how technological advances and social changes have subtly changed lives.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know that I entirely agree with Wooster&#8217;s thesis in its broadest sweeps; it seems to me that <b>Bruce Sterling</b>, who comes in for appreciation later in the article, is also continuing to grapple with how technology will transform society in the near future. Then again, Sterling and <b>William Gibson</b> have also started setting their fiction in today&#8217;s world, blurring the lines between sci-fi and contemporary literature in compelling ways&#8230; at any rate, Wooster&#8217;s unashamed enthusiasm for the genre is certainly contagious, and he proves that there&#8217;s still life in the multi-book approach that former <i>NYTBR</i> columnist Gerald Jonas used before he was replaced.</p>
<p>Another publication doing a great job of treating science fiction as just another contemporary form of literature is <i>Bookforum</i>, which brought in novelist <b>Carter Scholz</b> to review <a href="http://bookforum.com/scholz.html">a new biography of <b>Alice B. Sheldon</b></a>, who wrote SF stories under the name <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Tiptree,_Jr."><b>James Tiptree, Jr</b></a>. There&#8217;s not much to say here other than to recommend that you read Scholz&#8217;s effort, which treats Sheldon and her literary legacy with the same respect the <i>Review</i> reserves for, say, James Wood on Flaubert or Jonathan Franzen on Alice Munro. It&#8217;s hard to imagine the <i>Review</i> deigning to review a biography of a science fiction writer; they&#8217;d much rather spend their time on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/books/review/28schillinger.html?ex=1306468800&amp;en=303e134a96592834&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">the memoirs of promiscuous food critics</a>. Maybe the psychosexual turbulence of Sheldon&#8217;s life (not to mention her death) will register on their radar screens, though, and we can look forward to a thoughtful review from the likes of <b>Jonathan Lethem</b> or <b>Liesl Schillinger</b> (who, it must be said, at least made a reasonably persuasive argument for <i>Insatiable</i> as smart entertainment).</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/taking-sci-fi-seriously_b2223#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/taking-sci-fi-seriously_b2223</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/taking-sci-fi-seriously_b2223</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Lit Crit]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 10:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Have Platform, will Publish</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>&lt;a href=&quot;http<strong>://www.publishersmarketplace.com&#8221;&gt;</strong>Publishers Marketplace&#8217;s<strong></a> semi-snarky headline on this story is that the <em>NY Observer</strong></em> has &#8220;finally discovered platforms&#8221; and I can&#8217;t really argue &#8211; after all, a recent visit by a freelance editor at <a href="http://www.bksp.org">a notable writer&#8217;s site</a> stressed that if two fiction projects came across her desk, and writer A had no platform and writer B had one, well, guess which one she was more likely to buy.</p>
<p>But now, <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060605/20060605_Sheelah_Kolhatkar_pageone_newsstory3.asp">as <strong>Sheelah Kolhatkar</strong> reports</a>, the word is everywhere. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know where it comes from, but people use it all the time now&#8221; said <strong>Jonathan Burnham</strong>, senior vice president and publisher at HarperCollins. &#8220;It&#8217;s a question editors ask agents when they&#8217;re discussing a book, and they say, &#8216;What&#8217;s the author&#8217;s platform?&#8217; It&#8217;s much used within sales and marketing meetings and so on: &#8216;How solid and substantial is this story, and how is it going to work for the media?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ultimately, platform seems to be about having key talking points, built-in readership and an ability to promote oneself that makes life easier for the poor publicist in charge of the author&#8217;s work. And thanks the the internet, creating platform and &#8211; gack &#8211; &#8220;buzz&#8221; is that much less expensive.</p>
<p>So what about reviews? &#8220;[What it] means, in essence, is that review culture is dead,&#8221; said another publisher requesting anonymity. (The review culture may be dead, Kolhatkar adds, but that doesn&#8217;t mean this person wants to piss off <em><strong>The New York Times</strong></em>.) And for the writer lacking a platform? &#8216;He needs to be a really good writer,&#8221; said one unnamed publisher, practically shrugging. &#8220;Still happens.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/have-platform-will-publish_b2222#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/have-platform-will-publish_b2222</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/have-platform-will-publish_b2222</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 09:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes Virginia, there will be a sequel to the Graduate</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to confess something from the getgo: though I thought the movie was fine and dandy, I hated the book. Hated, loathed, despised it. Why? Because Benjamin Braddock was a whiny slacker who didn&#8217;t want to take responsibility for anything and then essentially annoyed Elaine into finally accepting him. How was this supposed to be a good novel? But of course, no one asked me, and it was very sad to hear that the author, <strong>Charles Webb</strong>, had been in extremely dire straits of late &#8211; and that he&#8217;d obtained a flat fee for the rights to the book and never saw a penny of the profits from the movie.</p>
<p>So now word comes in via the BBC <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5030912.stm">that Webb has sold the rights to a sequel to <strong>Random House</strong></a> (presumably, UK, no word on whether a US house has anted up to publish) that will be released in June 2007. The Times had initially reported that Webb was initially reluctant to negotiate a publishing deal for this new book, but now that he&#8217;s gone ahead, it&#8217;s believed the new book will bring back Mrs. Robinson in some form or another.</p>
<p>And maybe, just maybe, Mr. Braddock will actually behave like a real man. But I kind of doubt it.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/yes-virginia-there-will-be-a-sequel-to-the-graduate_b2221#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/yes-virginia-there-will-be-a-sequel-to-the-graduate_b2221</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/yes-virginia-there-will-be-a-sequel-to-the-graduate_b2221</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 08:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Today in Wottakar&#8217;s: HMV officially makes the buy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Has the saga finally ended? Will WHSmith counter-offer? It&#8217;s all so exhausting to keep up, but Reuters reports that <a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=businessNews&amp;storyID=2006-05-31T071929Z_01_WLA9948_RTRUKOC_0_UK-RETAIL-OTTAKARS-HMV.xml">HMV will finally, finally buy Ottakar&#8217;s</a> for a cut-price 62.8 million pounds (or a measly 285p per share) to help its own books chain cope with stiff competition from supermarkets and the Internet.</p>
<p>&#8220;Over the past year the book market has undergone a significant change with new levels of competition from the supermarkets and on-line retailers impacting all specialist booksellers and in particular those with insufficient scale to compete on equal terms,&#8221; Ottakar&#8217;s Chairman Philip Dunne said in a statement, explaining why he was backing HMV&#8217;s offer.</p>
<p>As it happens, on Tuesday, Ottakar&#8217;s shares closed at 287p, just above HMV&#8217;s offer price. Not exactly a huge profit margin going on here..</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/today-in-wottakars-hmv-officially-makes-the-buy_b2220#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/today-in-wottakars-hmv-officially-makes-the-buy_b2220</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/today-in-wottakars-hmv-officially-makes-the-buy_b2220</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 08:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scenes from the Girls&#8217; Night Out Party</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="red-dress-party.jpg" src="/galleycat/files/original/red-dress-partyA.jpg" width="250" height="410" class="alignright" />When Sarah and I received our invites to the launch party for <i>Girls&#8217; Night Out</i>, the latest benefit anthology from <b>Red Dress Ink</b>, we were expecting the usual sort of book reception: a couple authors, some industry pros, and a few media representatives. We knew it wasn&#8217;t going to be one of those nights when Sarah called me from in front of the night club and told me there was a line halfway down the block. Turns out there had also been a &#8220;Red Dress Ink Design Challenge,&#8221; where contestants were invited to design a little red dress&#8230;and not only were they planning to unveil the winner at the party, they&#8217;d also invited five women from <i>America&#8217;s Top Model</i> to join in the festivities. (I&#8217;m afraid I wouldn&#8217;t have recognized any of them if I&#8217;d ever left the authors&#8217; VIP section, though; when it comes to reality TV, I&#8217;m more the <i>Dog Whisperer</i> demographic.) The room was packed, the music was loud, and they kept mixing the vodka with <i>Tab</i>, of all things. But, still, we had fun.</p>
<p><b>Top: <a href="http://www.melissasenate.com">Melissa Senate</a></b> and <a href="http://www.carenlissner.com"><b>Caren Lissner</b></a> were among the first authors to arrive. <b>Middle: </b>Once Sarah and I figured out that we could check in with the media coordinator instead of waiting in the line outside the club, we quickly ran into <a href="http://jennifersturman.com/"><b>Jennifer Sturman</b></a>, one of RDI&#8217;s first mystery novelists; <i>Girls&#8217; Night Out</i> contributors <b>Lauren Henderson</b> and <b>Nicola Krauss</b> check out the one-sheet of author photos. <b>Bottom: </b>RDI executive editor <b>Margaret Marbury</b> introduces the house&#8217;s newest author, <b>Poonam Sharma</b>, to seasoned chick-lit/mystery novelists <a href="http://www.lauracaldwell.com/bio.htm"><b>Laura Caldwell</b></a> and <a href="http://www.lyndacurnyn.com"><b>Lynda Curnyn</b></a>.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/scenes-from-the-girls-night-out-party_b2219#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/scenes-from-the-girls-night-out-party_b2219</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/scenes-from-the-girls-night-out-party_b2219</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Hopping]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 08:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>BookExpo Aftermath Includes Dueling Podcasts</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For all you folks who didn&#8217;t get to go to <b>BookExpo America</b>, you can still listen to <a href="http://www.bookexpocast.com/">the official BEA podcasts</a>, which so far include speeches by <b>Tim Russert</b> and <b>John Updike</b> and a five-minute interview with <b>Pat Schroeder</b>. But you can also listen outside the box and download the interviews <b>Ed Champion</b> conducted with various BEA attendees and exhibitors as he wandered through the aisles and meeting rooms. <a href="http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=60">His first installment</a> includes sound bites from several bloggers (including, I freely disclose, myself making some asinine comments about liking <i>The Long Tail</i> because &#8220;it&#8217;s nice to see <i>Wired</i> being relevant again&#8221;) as well as novelists Michelle Wildgen and Delia Falconer. Funnily enough, the first section of Champion&#8217;s roundup includes a brutal analysis of the podcasting panel BookExpo just released in their slew of recorded programs&#8230;No word yet, however, on whether that lineup is going to include the confrontation between Champion and <b>Sam Tanenhaus</b>.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bookexpo-aftermath-includes-dueling-podcasts_b2218#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bookexpo-aftermath-includes-dueling-podcasts_b2218</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bookexpo-aftermath-includes-dueling-podcasts_b2218</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Web & Tech]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 08:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Sucess Through Clean Living, by Barry Bonds?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="chicken-orbeef.jpg" src="/galleycat/files/original/chicken-orbeef.jpg" width="180" height="165" class="alignleft" />&#8220;If you can&#8217;t find a book on our site,&#8221; boasts <b>Abebooks.com</b>, &#8220;it probably doesn&#8217;t exist.&#8221; So they decided to come up with <a href="http://www.abebooks.com/docs/10-anniversary/not-books.shtml">some of those imaginary titles</a> for you, from Henry VIII&#8217;s <i>Making Marriage Work</i> to <i>Whoops, I Was Wrong</i> by George W. Bush. Before you accuse them of being too partisan, though, they&#8217;ve also created a mock-up for Kim Jong Il&#8217;s <i>Everything You Wanted to Know About North Korea But Were Afraid to Ask</i>&#8230;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/no-sucess-through-clean-living-by-barry-bonds_b2217#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/no-sucess-through-clean-living-by-barry-bonds_b2217</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/no-sucess-through-clean-living-by-barry-bonds_b2217</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookselling]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>John Updike doesn&#8217;t exactly heart the Internet</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/05/30/books/updike190.jpg" class="alignleft">First proof of such? <strong>John Updike</strong>&#8216;s speech at BEA (now available in podcast format) where he went off, essentially, on the paradigm shift in publishing towards more technologically-based means. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/31/books/31updi.html">Next up is today&#8217;s profile by <strong>Chip McGrath</strong></a> (who, for a former NYTBR editor, sure seems to be popping up a lot of late) where Updike grudgingly admits to going online to research his new novel TERRORIST, although he was heartened to find out that &#8220;the Internet doesn&#8217;t like you to learn too much about explosives.&#8221;</p>
<p>More to the point, the new novel sort of uses the thriller structure, a form Updike has never tried before. And McGrath seems to be relieved that no matter what the &#8220;classic Updikean traits&#8221; are still in evidence, which seems kind of condescending. Fortunately, when Updike talks about what&#8217;s next for him, he acknowledges the difficulty of the mystery/thriller format. &#8220;I try to see the next book in my mind, and I see a slightly plump book with a lot of people in it, like &#8216;Gosford Park.&#8217; But it&#8217;s not a murder mystery because I&#8217;m not clever enough to write one of those.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/john-updike-doesnt-exactly-heart-the-internet_b2216#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/john-updike-doesnt-exactly-heart-the-internet_b2216</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/john-updike-doesnt-exactly-heart-the-internet_b2216</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 07:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>One Week They&#8217;re Literati,The Next They&#8217;re Foodies</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So the <i>NYTBR</i> decided to publish <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/indexes/2006/05/27/books/review/index.html">an all-food issue</a> over the Memorial Day weekend&#8212;its second themed edition in two weeks (following last week&#8217;s all-fiction issue) and its third (you remember January&#8217;s &#8220;Literary Lives,&#8221; right?) of 2006. Setting aside the question of whether we can look forward to more of this kind of stunt publishing from the <i>Review</i> in the future, how does the food issue stack up?</p>
<p>Well, I won&#8217;t spend too much time directly arguing about whether this issue <i>really</i> came about because &#8220;we saw the remarkable range and depth of the food-related books being published this season&#8212;more and better than in any single season we can remember,&#8221; even though it seems to me that you could point to plenty of recent seasons with an equally impressive lineup of food books. And I won&#8217;t even question <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/books/review/28ephron.html?ex=1306468800&amp;en=c3f57d3fb12fad84&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">the kid-glove treatment</a> regular <i>Review</i> contributors <b>Jane and Michael Stern</b> get from <b>Nora Ephron</b>. Instead, we could talk about how the &#8220;food issue&#8221; is almost entirely &#8220;the food memoir issue,&#8221; as the actual cookbooks get lumped together into <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/books/review/28hesser_foodchronicle.html?ex=1306468800&amp;en=c3f57d3fb12fad84&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">one <b>Amanda Hesser</b> roundup</a>. On a more serious note, it&#8217;s worth pointing out that the experts called upon in the &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/28/books/review/28outofprintcookbks.html?ex=1306468800&amp;en=b964f355562d1592&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">Save These Books!</a>&#8221; feature include three authors who had just received glowing reviews a few pages earlier (the Sterns and <b>Anthony Bourdain</b>), as well as the subject of another lavishly praised book (<b>Mario Batali</b>, who figures prominently in <b>Bill Buford&#8217;s</b> <i>Heat</i>). It seems a little cozier than I expect from the <i>Times</i>, but maybe that&#8217;s just me. <a href="mailto:galleycatATmediabistroDOTcom">What did you think?</a></p>
<p>Of course, lest I be judged a kneejerk <i>NYTBR</i>-hater, I should point out that much of the actual writing in this issue is fairly commendable. It&#8217;s not the content that rings my alarms so much as the gimmicks surrounding it&#8230;but then again, too, we should perhaps at least give the <i>Review</i> credit for chasing after &#8220;news about the culture.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/one-week-theyre-literatithe-next-theyre-foodies_b2215#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/one-week-theyre-literatithe-next-theyre-foodies_b2215</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/one-week-theyre-literatithe-next-theyre-foodies_b2215</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Lit Crit]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hachette Shifts UK Sci-Fi Line to US</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quick tidbit from <a href="http://www.publishersmarketplace.com/lunch/">Publishers Lunch</a>: the British science fiction imprint <b>Orbit</b>, a division of Little, Brown UK, will be relocating to the <b>Hachette Book Group&#8217;s</b> New York office as part of a broader effort to take the line international. &#8220;I believe that there is a fantastic opportunity for a dynamic new SF/Fantasy imprint to thrive in the U.S.,&#8221; says publishing director <b>Tim Holman</b>, and plans call for the American Orbit to be publishing 40 titles a year by the end of the decade. The question is where they&#8217;ll come from: Most of Orbit&#8217;s May 2006 releases, for example, have already found U.S. homes at established sci-fi houses like <b>Tor</b> and <b>Del Rey</b>; the one exception, Russell Kirkpatrick&#8217;s <i>Across the Face of the World</i>, is a fantasy trilogy published in Australia by <b>HarperCollins</b>.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/hachette-shifts-uk-sci-fi-line-to-us_b2214#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/hachette-shifts-uk-sci-fi-line-to-us_b2214</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/hachette-shifts-uk-sci-fi-line-to-us_b2214</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>She&#8217;s really a secret agent when ghostwriters are her clients</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A lot of those bestsellers you see on various lists aren&#8217;t actually written by the authors whose names adorn the front covers. That&#8217;s hardly a surprise; ghostwriting is a crucial, if seldom discussed, component of the business. But literary agent Madeleine Morel took the art of ghosting an extra step when she founded <a href="http://www.2mcommunications.com/">2M Communications</a>, an agency that <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/articles/cache/a3669.asp">only represents ghostwriters</a>.</p>
<p>Publishers Weekly decided to find out how this agency began and how it works, and <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6338637.html?pubdate=5%2F29%2F2006&amp;display=current">the resulting article is a fascinating read</a>, especially with details of the economics of such deals: the ghostwriter may get a flat fee or a percentage of the advance with a guaranteed minimum, and Morel takes 15% commission on whatever she gets for the writers. The average ghostwriter&#8217;s advance is &#8220;between $30,000 and $100,000, which is a hell of a lot more than they could make on their own,&#8221; says Morel.</p>
<p>One of the big reasons she can be successful is because of the celebrification of publishing. Now that such books &#8211; like Nicole Richie&#8217;s &#8220;novel&#8221; THE TRUTH ABOUT DIAMONDS &#8211; are commercially successful, Morel says, it&#8217;s proving that &#8220;the Judith Regan approach to publishing works. I have no doubt that it&#8217;s going to happen more and more.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/shes-really-a-secret-agent-when-ghostwriters-are-her-clients_b2213#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/shes-really-a-secret-agent-when-ghostwriters-are-her-clients_b2213</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/shes-really-a-secret-agent-when-ghostwriters-are-her-clients_b2213</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 10:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Slam Poetry for the Cyber-crowd?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Dinitia Smith</b> files a story for the <i>NYT</i> arts section on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/29/books/29muse.html?ex=1306555200&amp;en=f1885c41c3f6c7b3&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">poets playing about on the Internet</a>&#8212;specifically on a site called <a href="http://www.quickmuse.com"><b>QuickMuse</b></a>, where versifiers square off to write simultaneous works in 15 minutes or less. It&#8217;s hard to call it a &#8220;competition&#8221; when they don&#8217;t actually appoint a winner, so when former poet laureate <b>Robert Pinsky</b> squares off tonight against <b>Julianna Baggott</b>, who&#8217;s better known perhaps for her fiction, any snap judgments we might make will probably turn out to be wrong..which could be the best thing that could happen to them.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/slam-poetry-for-the-cyber-crowd_b2212#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/slam-poetry-for-the-cyber-crowd_b2212</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/slam-poetry-for-the-cyber-crowd_b2212</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Web & Tech]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Books, Funny Books: &#8216;Net Devours All</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>LA Times</i> reporter <b>Michelle Keller</b>investigates <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-fi-comics29may29,1,593573.story?coll=la-headlines-entnews&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true">the online comics-swapping suubculture</a>, where it&#8217;s said that some fans are scanning their favorite comics page by page, putting them on peer-to-peer networks, and letting other fans download them for free. The story&#8217;s a bit alarmist, but it sticks strictly to the impact on the superhero genre&#8230;when there&#8217;s arguably a more interesting story about pirated comics to be found among the denizens of &#8220;<a href="http://www.tcj.com/269/n_scan.html">Scanlation Nation</a>,&#8221; the wave of amateur <i>manga</i> translators who take Japanese comics that haven&#8217;t been licensed to American publishers and come up with their own English-language adaptations.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/books-funny-books-net-devours-all_b2211#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/books-funny-books-net-devours-all_b2211</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/books-funny-books-net-devours-all_b2211</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Comicbookland]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The nitty gritty of publishing co-op</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the not-so-kept secrets of the industry is that those books you see on the tables at Barnes &amp; Noble or Borders (or in the UK, Waterstone&#8217;s, Ottakar&#8217;s and Borders)? The publisher paid for placement. And <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-523-2200275-523,00.html">in a lengthy piece in the Sunday Times</a>, Robert Winnett &amp; Holly Watt, they reveal exactly how much publishers are expected to pay: Â£50,000 a week per book for a place.</p>
<p>A director of one leading publisher said: &#8220;If you pay this fee in December your book will be a bestseller. But only a handful of the biggest publishers can now afford the fees so the book charts are totally skewed.&#8221; The practice was first exposed five years ago but now the consensus is that it&#8217;s &#8220;getting out of hand&#8221;, especially when deep discounting is factored into the equation.</p>
<p>A spokeswoman for WH Smith confirmed last week that publishers paid for endorsements. &#8220;The publishers present their books to us and we present our packages,&#8221; she said. &#8220;The purpose is to drive sales for customers. We negotiate who takes the places in the adult gold scheme which is over-subscribed. This is standard across the book industry.&#8221; Which may explain why one publisher claimed that he had books &#8220;recommended&#8221; and positively reviewed in marketing literature by bookshops before the books had even been read&#8230;.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the-nitty-gritty-of-publishing-co-op_b2210#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the-nitty-gritty-of-publishing-co-op_b2210</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the-nitty-gritty-of-publishing-co-op_b2210</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 08:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>M&amp;S further in bed with Random House</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>McLelland and Stewart is synonymous with all things CanLit &#8211; publishing Margaret Atwood and Farley Mowat, to name a couple of venerated Canadian writers &#8211; but ever since Random House bought a 25% stake in the company (the University of Toronto owns the rest) there have been <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060529.MCCLELLAND29/TPStory/Entertainment">rumblings about the house&#8217;s ability to stay truly independent</a>, as Guy Dixon of the Globe and Mail reveals. This was especially apparent earlier this year when M&amp;S laid off three of its senior publicists and marketing managers earlier this year, just as the company was embarking on its year of centenary celebrations.</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;ve still got a core of true believers in there. But I think that, generally, management [of the company] is sliding away from them,&#8221; said writer and Blackfish Press co-founder Brian Brett, who is also chairman of the Writers&#8217; Union of Canada. &#8220;It&#8217;s an incremental thing. You see it happening bit by bit, getting whittled down. They have actually held out, in many ways, longer than the other publishers. But they are following the general mass of major publishers, [which] are all becoming branch-plant operations that hire independent editors who try to create a brand.&#8221;</p>
<p>M&amp;S CEO Doug Pepper begs to differ, saying that the ties only extend to &#8220;really high book deals&#8221; and sales &amp; marketing decisions. &#8220;We share a marketing department, share a sales department and share publicity departments, although we have people on site here that only work on the M&amp;S books. Do we bring in [Random House] people a little earlier now? Yes, but it doesn&#8217;t have to do with the decisions we make on books. It just is a smart thing to do to increase the lead time on any specific book in order to arrange book tours, ads and other sales strategies.&#8221;</p>
<p>But when there&#8217;s corporate influence of any kind, people are going to wonder, no matter what&#8230;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/ms-further-in-bed-with-random-house_b2209#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/ms-further-in-bed-with-random-house_b2209</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/ms-further-in-bed-with-random-house_b2209</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
