<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/common_v4/xsl/content.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
	>

<channel>
<title>Browse GalleyCat August 2007 archives - GalleyCat</title>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat</link>
<description>The First Word On the Book Publishing Industry</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<atom:link href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/date/2007/08/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>

<item>
<title>What, Are You Still Here?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="lolgalleycat-vacation.jpg" src="/galleycat/files/original/lolgalleycat-vacation.jpg" width="425" height="319" /></p>
<p>Happy Labor Day weekend&#8212;see you Tuesday morning.</p>
<p>(Vacashun Kat is&#8230;Spot, who looks like a cutie but, according to <b>Dutton</b>/<b>Gotham</b> publicity manager <b>Beth Parker</b>, is actually a terror.)</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/what-are-you-still-here_b5505#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/what-are-you-still-here_b5505</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/what-are-you-still-here_b5505</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[LOLgalleycats]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bongos and Catcher&#8217;s Mitts, Put to Uses God Never Intended</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Readers of a certain age will remember <b>Don Novello</b>&#8216;s classic <i>The Laszlo Letters</i>, a collection of the absurd letters that Novello, a television comedy writer best known for his appearances as Father Guido Sarducci, wrote under a pseudonym to celebrities and corporate executives, along with the serious responses he got back. Lots of people have tried this schtick in the thirty years since that book&#8217;s original publication&#8212;Novello&#8217;s own latest sequel, <i>From Bush to Bush</i>, came out in 2003&#8212;and here&#8217;s a guy who&#8217;s tapped into the opportunities offered by our shiny new digital world, with <a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/entertainment/story/123304.html">a batch of wacky letters to eBay vendors</a> called, simply enough, <i>Letters to eBay</i>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qyC-RMfWYUg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qyC-RMfWYUg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p>Two warnings: The soundtrack is incongruously loaded with what Stan Freberg used to call &#8216;pling pling pling jazz,&#8217; which I suspect is a deliberate bid for irony, and there&#8217;s a simulated scene of natural childbirth that might be NSFW if you&#8217;re in a particularly uptight workplace. But then, you shouldn&#8217;t be watching five-minute videos when you&#8217;re at work anyway, should you? Oh, go ahead; we all know you&#8217;re just killing time until you can bail for the three-day weekend, and I bet your boss didn&#8217;t even come in today.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bongos-and-catchers-mitts-put-to-uses-god-never-intended_b5504#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bongos-and-catchers-mitts-put-to-uses-god-never-intended_b5504</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bongos-and-catchers-mitts-put-to-uses-god-never-intended_b5504</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Litterbox]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sex Advice Expert Demands Bigger Trailers</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="amber-madison-headshot.jpg" src="/galleycat/files/original/amber-madison-headshot.jpg" width="425" height="252" /></p>
<p>YouTube doesn&#8217;t seem big enough for <b>Amber Madison</b>, a 23-year-old author who turned the experience she gained writing sex advice for the campus newspaper at Tufts into <i>Hooking Up: A Girl&#8217;s All-Out Guide to Sex &amp; Sexuality</i>, published earlier this year by <b>Prometheus</b>. In addition to her standard website, Madison is collaborating with <b>Weller/Grossman Productions</b>, a TV production company specializing in reality-based programming for networks from CNN to Animal Planet, and <b>Permission TV</b>, a technology firm which has provided broadband video capabilities for clients like Mitt Romney and Activision, on <a href="http://www.ambermadisontv.com">AmberMadisonTV.com</a>. The website debuted last month with thirty widescreen &#8220;episodes&#8221; of <i>The Talk With Amber Madison</i>, a series of short videos&#8212;with larger &#8220;screens&#8221; than YouTube and better image quality&#8212;featuring advice on everything from how to deal with undesired &#8220;hair down there&#8221; to extracting yourself from an abusive relationship. New episodes are added weekly, and viewers are able to email their own questions to Madison or participate in the site&#8217;s other online forums. (There&#8217;s a long disclaimer video before you get to the content, explaining why visitors shouldn&#8217;t post their personal information, how Madison&#8217;s not a doctor, and so on.)</p>
<p>The press release about the website is careful to note that this isn&#8217;t intended to promote Madison&#8217;s book, but is &#8220;a genuine new media venture&#8221; reaching out to its own audience. But of course there&#8217;s a consideration towards her publishing career, if only in the sense that the young author is assembling her own &#8220;platform,&#8221; as the industry experts call it. Although the production values could still use a little work; between that backdrop and the fake plant, the clips still have a slight aura of public access about them&#8230;or, ironically enough, a porn studio in the Valley.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/sex-advice-expert-demands-bigger-trailers_b5503#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/sex-advice-expert-demands-bigger-trailers_b5503</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/sex-advice-expert-demands-bigger-trailers_b5503</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Web & Tech]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Book Parties No Longer Dead, Just Bloated</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the first to admit I&#8217;m not all that attentive to the fashion and style thing, so it wasn&#8217;t until somebody asked me why I hadn&#8217;t written about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/style/tmagazine/26obsessions.html?ex=1346212800&amp;en=7abed9d39d4e546b&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss"><b>Alex Kuczynski</b>&#8216;s skeptical look at literary megaparties</a> in last Sunday&#8217;s <i>NYT</i> style supplement that I even knew the article existed. Unlike <b>Rachel Donadio</b>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/23/books/review/23donadio.html?ex=1188705600&amp;en=9f4d2da6e98824ef&amp;ei=5070">who filed a death notice for the book party</a> back in April 2006, Kuczynski recounts all the soirees she&#8217;s been to that were &#8220;so huge and elaborate that you might think you were at a wedding.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, even while spinning in the opposite direction, she hits the same <b>James Atlas</b> essay for the <i>New Yorker</i> Donadio did; you can&#8217;t write a piece about book parties <i>without</i> acknowledging its existence. After that, it&#8217;s all &#8220;you should&#8217;ve been at Elaine&#8217;s, back when we were all poor but we could smoke in bars, so we were happy, and now we have parties in rich people&#8217;s apartments, and that&#8217;s pretty sweet, too.&#8221; Basically, my one takeaway from this article was that I need to be doing more outreach, because I wasn&#8217;t at <i>any</i> of the fancy parties Kuczynski writes about, and I&#8217;m not exactly a wallflower. &#8220;I had a book party last year at 21 Club,&#8221; she confides halfway through her spiel, &#8220;and I paid for it, and it sure was expensive, and only about 90 people came, and no one wrote a single peep about it.&#8221; <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/party_hopping/default.asp">I would&#8217;ve, honest!</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/book-parties-no-longer-dead-just-bloated_b5502#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/book-parties-no-longer-dead-just-bloated_b5502</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/book-parties-no-longer-dead-just-bloated_b5502</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Hopping]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robert Barnett&#8217;s Multimillion Dollar Advance Touch</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.wc.com/img/attorney_pics/86.jpg" class="alignright"><a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/books/la-et-barnett31aug31,0,2883745.story?coll=la-books-headlines">Bloomberg&#8217;s <strong>Edward Nawotka</strong> finally uncovers some answers</a> to questions I&#8217;ve wanted to ask for ages: how exactly does <strong>Robert Barnett</strong> earn his living from the megawatt authors, politicians and celebrities he represents? Not by standard agency commission, that&#8217;s for sure, because even though Barnett, a partner at the DC firm <strong>Williams &amp; Connolly</strong>, functions on behalf of his book clients much as an agent does &#8212; negotiating contracts, assisting with the editing process, refereeing between writer and publisher &#8212; he firmly rejects the term.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m a lawyer and proud of it,&#8221; he told Nawotka. &#8220;I bill my clients an hourly rate; I don&#8217;t agree with taking a percentage for someone&#8217;s creative output.&#8221; (An agent typically takes a 15% to 20% commission as payment.) At $900 an hour, Barnett&#8217;s attention doesn&#8217;t come cheap. But when it&#8217;s a question of a multimillion-dollar contract, Barnett&#8217;s hourly rate can offer a client a massive savings over an agent&#8217;s commission. In an example Barnett cited, he billed a client $150,000 for negotiating a $3-million book contract &#8212; a substantial discount from the $450,000 to $600,000 an agent would customarily charge. Discounts for authors &#8211; but not for publishers. <strong>Knopf</strong> Publisher and President <strong>Sonny Mehta</strong> said to Nawotka that the upside of working with Barnett &#8220;is that when he calls about a client, it&#8217;s always someone you will want to take a meeting with. The downside is that he&#8217;s an expert on valuation, and as such I can never quite negotiate the deal I&#8217;d like.&#8221; An understatement to say the least&#8230;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/robert-barnetts-multimillion-dollar-advance-touch_b5501#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/robert-barnetts-multimillion-dollar-advance-touch_b5501</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/robert-barnetts-multimillion-dollar-advance-touch_b5501</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Nawotka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knopf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Barnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonny Mehta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams & Connolly]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Seeking Eyeballs, Thriller Writer Turns to Cable</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FsbtOSflRro"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FsbtOSflRro" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p>Before turning her talents to fiction, <a href="http://mjroseblog.typepad.com/buzz_balls_hype/"><b>M.J. Rose</b></a> was once a creative director at an ad agency; so was fellow thriller writer <a href="http://www.chrisgrabenstein.com/"><b>Chris Grabenstein</b></a>. Between the two of them, they created this 15-second spot for Rose&#8217;s new novel, <i>The Reincarnationist</i>, and got it slotted into next Monday&#8217;s season premiere of the History Channel show <i>Digging for the Truth</i>. Over the next five days, it will also air on four other shows on the History Channel and A&amp;E. Rose breaks down <a href="http://mjroseblog.typepad.com/buzz_balls_hype/2007/08/the-ad-man-an-2.html">the details on her media buying strategy</a> on her blog, but the meat of the story may lie in how she convinced her publisher, <b>MIRA</b>, to work the cable angle rather than taking out an <i>NYTBR</i> ad. &#8220;This whole package, production, media everything is less than 1/4 of a page in the <i>Times</i>,&#8221; Rose informed us yesterday, elaborating on her public discussion of how the nine airings she purchased may reach many more readers than an ad in even a heavily read book review section.</p>
<p>(Disclosure: I don&#8217;t actually look at our homepage regularly, except to see what Sarah&#8217;s written about, so it wasn&#8217;t until I filed this item that I discovered Rose had bought ad space from mediabistro.com and is running the ads now.)</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/seeking-eyeballs-thriller-writer-turns-to-cable_b5500#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/seeking-eyeballs-thriller-writer-turns-to-cable_b5500</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/seeking-eyeballs-thriller-writer-turns-to-cable_b5500</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publicity]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#8220;The Big Read&#8221; Goes to XM Radio</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/books/la-bkw-xmradiobooks30aug30,0,7607137.story?coll=la-books-headlines">In a press release issued yesterday</a>, <strong>The National Endowment for the Arts</strong> (NEA), in partnership with <strong>XM Radio</strong>, announced the launch of <strong>The Big Read on XM</strong>, a radio series based on the NEA&#8217;s national reading program of the same name. The Big Read brings communities together to read and discuss a single book in order to restore reading to the center of American public culture. Building on the literature program&#8217;s success, the new series will introduce the Big Read to XM&#8217;s more than 8.2 subscribers nationwide. The Big Read on XM premieres September 10 on Sonic Theater (XM Channel 163), the XM radio channel devoted to audio books and contemporary theater. Hosted by Sonic Theater Program Director Josephine Reed, the series&#8217;s first installment will feature FAHRENHEIT 451 by <strong>Ray Bradbury</strong>.</p>
<p>The Big Read on XM will air audio versions of classic novels in 30-minute installments, courtesy of Audible. Other program highlights will include NEA-produced readings, interviews, and commentary about each novel by some of the nation&#8217;s most celebrated authors, actors, and public figures. Just a few of the notable names taking part in the Big Read are actors <strong>Robert Duvall, Cheech Marin</strong>, and <strong>Mary Louise Parker</strong>, writers <strong>Ray Bradbury, Alice Walker</strong>, and <strong>Tony Hillerman</strong>, former Secretary of State <strong>Colin Powell</strong>, and retired Supreme Court Justice <strong>Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor</strong>.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the-big-read-goes-to-xm-radio_b5499#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the-big-read-goes-to-xm-radio_b5499</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/the-big-read-goes-to-xm-radio_b5499</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[New & Upcoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alice Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheech Marin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Louise Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Bradbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Duvall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Day O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Big Read on XM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The National Endowment for the Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Hillerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XM Radio]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard and Judy Focus on Kids&#8217; Books</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thebookseller.com/images/uploaded/831.jpg" class="alignleft"><a href="http://thebookseller.com/news/44382-kids-book-focus-for-richard--judy.html">The Bookseller&#8217;s <strong>Anna Richardson</strong> reports</a> that <strong>Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan</strong>, UK forces in literary tastemaking, are planning a one-off children&#8217;s book show as part of a new Channel 4 literacy season this autumn. &#8220;Richard &amp; Judy&#8217;s Best Kids&#8217; Books Ever&#8221; will be an hour-long, peak-time special featuring top children&#8217;s authors, aimed at encouraging children to read.</p>
<p>The program is part of a Channel 4 season on the state of Britain&#8217;s literacy that will run at the end of October. The week-long season will also include &#8220;Can&#8217;t Read, Can&#8217;t Write&#8221;, a series that follows a headmistress&#8217; mission to wipe out illiteracy in her primary school with the help of literacy expert <strong>Ruth Miskin</strong> and poet <strong>Benjamin Zephaniah</strong>, and a &#8220;Dispatches&#8221; investigation in which Channel 4 News&#8217; chief correspondent <strong>Alex Thompson</strong> investigates standards of children&#8217;s literacy in Britain and the wider social impact of poor literacy rates.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/richard-and-judy-focus-on-kids-books_b5498#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/richard-and-judy-focus-on-kids-books_b5498</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/richard-and-judy-focus-on-kids-books_b5498</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Zephaniah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Miskin]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Could a Borders-B&amp;N Merger Be Possible?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On face value the idea seems ludicrous, but after reading <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070831/BIZ/708310389/1001">this piece in the Detroit News by <strong>Nathan Hurst</strong></a>, there is some reasoning to the possibility that <strong>Barnes &amp; Noble</strong> and <strong>Borders</strong> could one day merge with each other. That is because last week, a federal court ruled that a combination of the nation&#8217;s largest organic grocers, <strong>Whole Foods</strong> and <strong>Wild Oats Markets</strong>, didn&#8217;t violate antitrust rules. U.S. regulators had argued that the merger could reduce competition and inflate prices for organic grocery shoppers. That deal closely mirrors a potential deal between Borders and Barnes &amp; Noble and &#8220;could be perceived as a potential new precedent and open up meaningful discussions,&#8221; <strong>David Schick</strong>, an analyst at <strong>Stifel Nicolaus &amp; Co.</strong> in New York, wrote in a report to investors earlier this week.</p>
<p>The talk of a potential merger of Borders and Barnes &amp; Noble comes as both firms struggle against online rivals such as Amazon.com and big-box retailers such as Target. Online stores often offer lower prices, and big-box stores are offering a much wider selection than they have in the past. Those struggles have led many industry analysts to speculate that by combining forces, the two companies might be able to better tackle the competition. Whether this happens remains in question, but it&#8217;s certainly not impossible&#8230;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/could-a-borders-bn-merger-be-possible_b5496#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/could-a-borders-bn-merger-be-possible_b5496</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/could-a-borders-bn-merger-be-possible_b5496</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnes & Noble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Schick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Hurst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stifel Nicolaus & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wild Oats Markets]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Waterstone&#8217;s Offers Details on New Supply Plans</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publishingnews.co.uk/pn/pno-news-display.asp?K=e2007083012014603&amp;CID=&amp;TAG=&amp;PGE=&amp;sg9t=daabe15109e501d803fecd17114eb8b8">Publishing News reports</a> that last week, <strong>Waterstone&#8217;s</strong> announced details of its much-discussed plans for a consolidation center and, with it, its supply chain partner. <strong>Unipart Logistics</strong> has won a 10- year contract with the retailer covering warehousing and distribution for all Waterstone&#8217;s stores and fulfillment for Waterstones.com. Unipart was also responsible for presenting the bookseller with a range of options from which it has chosen a 150,000 sq ft warehouse space in Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, which will be fully operational from May 1, 2008. <strong>Rob Entwistle</strong>, previously General Manager of Central Distribution for the<strong> Dixons Store Group</strong>, has been appointed to manage the contract with Unipart.</p>
<p>Said <strong>Simon Blacklock</strong>, Waterstone&#8217;s Supply Chain Director: &#8220;This is a very important step in the development of Waterstone&#8217;s supply chain. It will enable stores, and over 2,500 suppliers, to communicate more efficiently and cost-effectively, as well as being more environmentally sound, as it will deliver a drastic reduction in the use of cardboard and packing material. Unipart has a strong track record of innovation in the supply chain and has demonstrated a very real focus on meeting our key requirements of availability, cost-effectiveness, delivery and service quality. We look forward to the relationship producing many benefits for Waterstone&#8217;s and its suppliers.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/waterstones-offers-details-on-new-supply-plans_b5495#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/waterstones-offers-details-on-new-supply-plans_b5495</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/waterstones-offers-details-on-new-supply-plans_b5495</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dixons Store Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Entwistle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Blacklock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unipart Logistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterstone's]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Channel 4 Chief Inches Closer to Borders UK Deal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publishingnews.co.uk/pn/pno-news-display.asp?K=e2007083011562108&amp;CID=&amp;TAG=&amp;PGE=&amp;sg9t=5b4b4bd48ba9eb823f01677f9dcdb8d8">As per Publishing News</a> (and reported earlier this week) the entrepreneur <strong>Luke Johnson</strong> and his private equity firm <strong>Risk Capital Partners</strong> was widely expected to take control of <strong>Borders</strong>, keeping the current CEO <strong>David Roche</strong> at the helm, closing fewer than 10 stores and retaining the Borders name. Johnson is understood to have taken soundings on Roche from industry insiders this week &#8211; the sort of move that is only made when all the deal requirements are in place. One observer told PN: &#8220;Although he&#8217;s obviously acting out of self-interest and wants to make money, he&#8217;s clearly interested in bookselling as a sector. He&#8217;s imaginative and feisty, well-regarded when it comes to relatively small scale private equity investments.&#8221;</p>
<p>Analyst <strong>Richard Ratner</strong> at <strong>Seymour Pierce</strong> described Johnson as &#8220;a good egg. He&#8217;s got a good reputation and he&#8217;s got good people with him. He&#8217;ll buy something if it&#8217;s got potential.&#8221; Insiders say that as Chair of Channel 4, Johnson has seen the potential to boost book sales through Richard &amp; Judy. Those who know him say that he cares about books and their cultural importance, and that he sees Borders &#8220;as a business that matters.&#8221; One added: &#8220;He sees Borders as a strong intrinsic business, one that doesn&#8217;t need to be broken up. And because he cares about it, he&#8217;ll be willing to accept slightly lower financial returns than in some of his other ventures.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/channel-4-chief-inches-closer-to-borders-uk-deal_b5494#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/channel-4-chief-inches-closer-to-borders-uk-deal_b5494</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/channel-4-chief-inches-closer-to-borders-uk-deal_b5494</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Ratner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Capital Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seymour Pierce]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>B&amp;N Will Carry If I Did It Now</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="ifididit-goldmans-cover.jpg" src="/galleycat/files/original/ifididit-goldmans-cover.jpg" width="250" height="268" class="alignleft" />Following this morning&#8217;s item about <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/new_upcoming/25k_more_copies_of_if_i_did_it_why_66096.asp">the increased print run for <i>If I Did It</i></a>, and my curiosity as to who was buying those extra copies, <b>Barnes &amp; Noble</b> has confirmed that it is reversing its decision to keep the book off its shelves.</p>
<p>&#8220;When plans were initially announced to publish <i>If I Did It</i>,&#8221; says spokeswoman <b>Mary Ellen Keating</b> in a statement documenting the policy change, &#8220;there was widespread customer outrage and disgust. So much outrage that our buyers felt there would be little customer demand for the newest edition of the book, published by The Goldman Family.&#8221; Hence the original decision to only sell the book through their website or for in-store special orders. &#8220;Since then,&#8221; Keating notes, &#8220;we&#8217;ve been monitoring the pre-orders and customer requests and have concluded that enough customers have expressed interest in buying the book to warrant stocking it in our stores. We do not intend to promote the book but we will stock it in our stores because our customers are asking for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, B&amp;N is doing exactly what <b>Borders</b> has said they&#8217;d do all along. Interesting how consumer interest went from &#8220;<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bookselling/bn_still_sees_little_interest_in_oj_tellall_65960.asp">a handful of pre-orders</a>&#8221; to &#8220;enough customers&#8230; to warrant stocking it in our stores&#8221; in just two days, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bn-will-carry-if-i-did-it-now_b5493#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bn-will-carry-if-i-did-it-now_b5493</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/bn-will-carry-if-i-did-it-now_b5493</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[New & Upcoming]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>25K More Copies of If I Did It: Why?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Beaufort Books</b> has upped its first printing of the Goldman-approved edition of <I>If I Did It</i> from <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/publishing/beaufort_preps_125000_first_run_for_if_i_did_it_65889.asp">the 125,000 we told you about Tuesday</a> to 150,000 copies, according to our most recent conversation with the company&#8217;s president, <b>Eric Kampmann</b>. Where does Beaufort expect to sell those extra copies? I&#8217;m waiting to hear back from <b>Barnes &amp; Noble</b> about whether their decision not to carry the book, due to what they perceived as a lack of interest, is still in effect.</p>
<p>In a possibly related development, <b>Fred and Kim Goldman</b> are expected to issue a press release later this afternoon.</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/new_upcoming/bn_will_carry_if_i_did_it_now_66128.asp">Yep, B&amp;N&#8217;s gonna sell it</a>.</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Ron Hogan</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/25k-more-copies-of-if-i-did-it-why_b5492#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/25k-more-copies-of-if-i-did-it-why_b5492</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/25k-more-copies-of-if-i-did-it-why_b5492</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[New & Upcoming]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lamott Disinvited, then Invited to Speak in Omaha</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.omaha.com/neo-images/photos/medium/82907sqlamott.jpg" class="alignleft"><strong>Anne Lamott</strong> has been speaking around the country to packed houses for years, and so it wasn&#8217;t a surprise that Creighton University in Omaha would invite her to speak at the <strong>Joslyn Art Museum</strong> on September 19. But last Friday, the Omaha World Herald reports, <a href="http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&amp;u_sid=10117585">the University decided to disinvite her</a> after learning of an essay in which she helped a cancer-ridden friend die. University officials decided that Lamott&#8217;s views were inconsistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church, university spokeswoman Kathryn Clark said. &#8220;We have decided that the key points she makes are in opposition to Catholic teaching,&#8221; Clark said. &#8220;That makes her an inappropriate choice.&#8221;</p>
<p>But considering the essay was written ten years ago, and Lamott had no plans to talk of assisted suicide or abortion (another subject deemed too hot) then what was the problem? <a href="http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=1000&amp;u_sid=10119307">The disconnect helped spark outrage</a> in Omaha among booksellers and university attendees, but it also spurred the Holland Performing Arts Center to step in. So yes, <a href="http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&amp;u_sid=10118776">Lamott will be speaking in Omaha on September 19 after all</a>. The kicker? The Holland Center holds 2,000 people, which will allow more people to hear Lamott. Seating at Joslyn would have allowed about 1,200 to attend.  &#8220;Anne Lamott&#8217;s writing has just meant a great deal to me,&#8221; said the Rev. <strong>Nancy Brink</strong> of North Side Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) who stepped in upon hearing of the cancellation. &#8220;I think she really connects with average people who struggle with meaning and real life.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/lamott-disinvited-then-invited-to-speak-in-omaha_b5491#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/lamott-disinvited-then-invited-to-speak-in-omaha_b5491</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/lamott-disinvited-then-invited-to-speak-in-omaha_b5491</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Lamott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joslyn Art Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Brink]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Further Ruminations on &#8220;Hot Young Author Chick Syndrome&#8221;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thephoenix.com/secure/uploadedImages/The_Phoenix/Arts/Books/HotAuthors_ROUGH(2).jpg" width="425" height="285"></p>
<p>Remember the time when it was almost impossible to get a novel published if you were under 40? Remember when author photos were nixed if you looked too young for a serious endeavor? Yeah, I don&#8217;t either, but I have it on pretty good authority that&#8217;s what publishing was like in the thirty years after World War II. And then the photogenic boom set in and now we get articles like <a href="http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid46350.aspx">the cover story of this week&#8217;s Boston Phoenix</a> about why authors must look goooooooood to get published. All the usual suspects &#8211; Pessl, Kunkel, Krauss &amp; Foer, Freudenberger, Vachon &#8211; are namechecked and analyzed for why their looks helped get them a big publishing contract (a topic <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/articles/hogan_bookjacket.asp">Ron covered in similar detail</a> for Writer&#8217;s Digest last year.)</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s easier in life to be attractive. That&#8217;s reductive but true,&#8221; says <strong>HarperCollins</strong> editor <strong>Gail Winston</strong> to <strong>Sharon Steel</strong>. &#8220;On the other hand, a brilliant book by an author who is not young and not attractive isn&#8217;t going to fail. It&#8217;s just, I think that those other books &#8211; for those reasons, those authors maybe get a little bit of an advantage.&#8221; But Gawker&#8217;s <strong>Emily Gould</strong> wishes the story was a little different. &#8220;The combination of fair-to-middling &#8211; or even strong but underdeveloped &#8211; talent with attractiveness and youth seems to be eternal catnip to publishers, if not reading audiences, and I think that&#8217;s a shame. What I am deeply, passionately opposed to is all the ridiculous praise that&#8217;s heaped on just-okay books because of the looks and pedigree and other accomplishments of their authors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another feeling the adulation and backlash is <strong>Katherine Taylor </strong> (<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/authors/could_this_rookie_author_be_starbucks_next_choice_46296.asp">first talked about here last fall</a> when I speculated she was a good bet for a Starbucks pick, which didn&#8217;t happen.) &#8220;I haven&#8217;t had a very long career as a writer, but while I was publishing stories, and when I got this book contract [for RULES FOR SAYING GOODBYE, published last spring by <strong>FSG</strong>] nobody knew what I looked like or who I was at all. My appearance had nothing to do with anything,&#8221; Taylor  says. &#8220;But I&#8217;m not terribly concerned&#8230;The book is there, the book is always going to be there&#8230;I think the book stands on its own. All the noise surrounding it is just noise. I feel like whatever you have to do to get your book in the cultural conversation is all fair,&#8221; Taylor  continues. &#8220;Because the bottom line is, you&#8217;ve put so much of yourself and so many years of your life into what you&#8217;re doing. The greatest tragedy would be if nobody noticed.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/further-ruminations-on-hot-young-author-chick-syndrome_b5490#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/further-ruminations-on-hot-young-author-chick-syndrome_b5490</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/further-ruminations-on-hot-young-author-chick-syndrome_b5490</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gail Winston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HarperCollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Steel]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
