Do Ads Really Need to Be Clicked On, Anyway?

M.J. Rose has some thoughts about online advertising after yesterday’s post on whether clicking on ads really helps the blogs you read. Rose says she agrees with Seth Godin about creating “the most robust ad environment” possible, but she’s got a slight twist.
Godin emphasizes a scenario where advertisers have more opportunities to convert slightly interested consumers into purchasers, while Rose argues that conversion isn’t even the point—it’s about the increased exposure that comes with cheaper ad rates for online eyeballs. Most books, except for a handful written by established bestselling writers or dealing with hot topics, “won’t sell via an ad,” she says. “They will interest a reader via an ad,” though, and that should be enough: “Why are we suddenly judging ads by the most difficult criteria when for years publishers didn’t have any way to judge their ads at all?”
Anybody in the online marketing departments got any thoughts on this? And, circling back to the issue that started this whole discussion, is this vision of affordable ad territory really Good for the Bloggers?

Here’s another fun item from UnBeige, mediabistro.com’s design blog:
FishbowlLA editor
The publishing company, Clark explained by email over the weekend, is an offshoot of
After reading Friday’s item about Business Week columnist
Now, technically, it’s true: If 43.1 percent of the population are learning about books online, 56.9 percent aren’t, and you might even go so far as to call that a “vast majority.” Still, the numbers cited above are not insignificant—and, more than that, true marketing visionaries recognize that you don’t just market to today’s audience, which eventually dies on you, but with an eye on tomorrow’s. Sure, you can look at last year’s NEA survey and conclude that the youth have abandoned books, if you’re so inclined, and it’s entirely possible
Over at UnBeige, mediabistro.com’s design blog,
That prompted 




GalleyCat Twitter feed loading...