<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/common_v4/xsl/content.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"
	>

<channel>
<title>FSG - GalleyCat</title>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat</link>
<description>The First Word On the Book Publishing Industry</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<atom:link href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/tag/fsg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>

<item>
<title>Rodrigo Corral Named Creative Director at Farrar, Straus and Giroux</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/files/2011/03/Picture_12.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-26226 alignright" title="Picture_12" src="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/files/2011/03/Picture_12.png" alt="" width="129" height="180" /></a>Graphic designer <strong>Rodrigo Corral</strong> (pictured, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Rodrigo_Corral">via</a>) has been named creative director at Macmillan&#8217;s Farrar, Straus and Giroux (FSG). According to <em>Unbeige</em>, Corral actually worked at FSG from 1996 to 2000 following his graduation from the School of Visual Arts.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s more from <em><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/unbeige/rodrigo-corral-appointed-creative-director-of-farrar-straus-giroux_b12737">Unbeige</a></em>: &#8220;He begins in his new post early next month and will continue to run Rodrigo Corral Design, the nine-year-old studio behind such memorable book covers as those for <strong>James Frey</strong>&#8216;s <em>A Million Little Pieces</em>, a shelf of <strong>Chuck Palahniuk</strong> <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/chuck-palahniuk-tweets-fight-club-musical-rumor_b21195">novels</a>, <strong>Debbie Millman</strong>&#8216;s smashing <em>How to Think Like a Great Graphic Designer</em>, and <strong>Jay-Z</strong>&#8216;s <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/jay-zs-decoded-cover-revealed_b12723">recent memoir-cum-lyrical codex</a>, <em>Decoded</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rodrigo&#8217;s work has appeared in <em>New York Magazine</em>, <em>The Atlantic</em>, and <em>The New York Times Book Review</em>. His art has also been seen on books published by Simon &amp; Schuster, Penguin Group (USA), and W.W. Norton.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/rodrigo-corral-named-creative-director-at-farrar-straus-and-giroux_b26221#more-26221" class="more-link">continued&#8230;</a></p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Maryann Yin</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/rodrigo-corral-named-creative-director-at-farrar-straus-and-giroux_b26221#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/rodrigo-corral-named-creative-director-at-farrar-straus-and-giroux_b26221</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/?p=26221</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Jackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolving Door]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic designer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rodrigo Corral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School of Visual Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unbeige]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Further Ruminations on &#8220;Hot Young Author Chick Syndrome&#8221;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://thephoenix.com/secure/uploadedImages/The_Phoenix/Arts/Books/HotAuthors_ROUGH(2).jpg" width="425" height="285"></p>
<p>Remember the time when it was almost impossible to get a novel published if you were under 40? Remember when author photos were nixed if you looked too young for a serious endeavor? Yeah, I don&#8217;t either, but I have it on pretty good authority that&#8217;s what publishing was like in the thirty years after World War II. And then the photogenic boom set in and now we get articles like <a href="http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid46350.aspx">the cover story of this week&#8217;s Boston Phoenix</a> about why authors must look goooooooood to get published. All the usual suspects &#8211; Pessl, Kunkel, Krauss &amp; Foer, Freudenberger, Vachon &#8211; are namechecked and analyzed for why their looks helped get them a big publishing contract (a topic <a href="http://www.writersdigest.com/articles/hogan_bookjacket.asp">Ron covered in similar detail</a> for Writer&#8217;s Digest last year.)</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s easier in life to be attractive. That&#8217;s reductive but true,&#8221; says <strong>HarperCollins</strong> editor <strong>Gail Winston</strong> to <strong>Sharon Steel</strong>. &#8220;On the other hand, a brilliant book by an author who is not young and not attractive isn&#8217;t going to fail. It&#8217;s just, I think that those other books &#8211; for those reasons, those authors maybe get a little bit of an advantage.&#8221; But Gawker&#8217;s <strong>Emily Gould</strong> wishes the story was a little different. &#8220;The combination of fair-to-middling &#8211; or even strong but underdeveloped &#8211; talent with attractiveness and youth seems to be eternal catnip to publishers, if not reading audiences, and I think that&#8217;s a shame. What I am deeply, passionately opposed to is all the ridiculous praise that&#8217;s heaped on just-okay books because of the looks and pedigree and other accomplishments of their authors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another feeling the adulation and backlash is <strong>Katherine Taylor </strong> (<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/authors/could_this_rookie_author_be_starbucks_next_choice_46296.asp">first talked about here last fall</a> when I speculated she was a good bet for a Starbucks pick, which didn&#8217;t happen.) &#8220;I haven&#8217;t had a very long career as a writer, but while I was publishing stories, and when I got this book contract [for RULES FOR SAYING GOODBYE, published last spring by <strong>FSG</strong>] nobody knew what I looked like or who I was at all. My appearance had nothing to do with anything,&#8221; Taylor  says. &#8220;But I&#8217;m not terribly concerned&#8230;The book is there, the book is always going to be there&#8230;I think the book stands on its own. All the noise surrounding it is just noise. I feel like whatever you have to do to get your book in the cultural conversation is all fair,&#8221; Taylor  continues. &#8220;Because the bottom line is, you&#8217;ve put so much of yourself and so many years of your life into what you&#8217;re doing. The greatest tragedy would be if nobody noticed.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/further-ruminations-on-hot-young-author-chick-syndrome_b5490#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/further-ruminations-on-hot-young-author-chick-syndrome_b5490</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/further-ruminations-on-hot-young-author-chick-syndrome_b5490</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Gould]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gail Winston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HarperCollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Steel]]></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Several Figures Directly Included in Speech</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.observer.com/files/imagecache/article/files/OTR-SusanSontag1V.jpg" class="alignright">One wouldn&#8217;t necessarily think that essayist and thinker <strong>Susan Sontag</strong> could generate fresh news &#8211; what with her having died recently &#8211; <a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/regarding-writing-others">but as the Observer&#8217;s <strong>Michael Calderone</strong> reports</a>, a 2004 speech just published in a posthumous collection by <strong>FSG</strong> has sparked some controversy for the discovery that a section on hyperfiction owes a great debt (almost word for word) to a New York Times Book Review piece by <strong>Laura Miller</strong> in 1998. The similarities were discovered by <strong>John Lavagnino</strong>, a senior lecturer in humanities and computing at King&#8217;s College London, who wrote a short letter to the editor published in the Times Literary Supplement:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;Shortly after personal computers and word-processing programs became commonplace tools for writers, a brave new future for fiction was trumpeted,&#8221; Miller had written in the lead of her New York Times Book Review piece.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ever since word-processing programs became commonplace tools for most writers-including me-there have been those who assert that there is now a brave new future for fiction,&#8221; were the words Sontag delivered in the 2004 lecture.</p>
<p>Miller also wrote: &#8220;Hypertext is sometimes said to mimic real life, with its myriad opportunities and surprising outcomes&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sontag wrote: &#8220;Hyperfiction is sometimes said to mimic real life, with its myriad opportunities and surprising outcomes&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>FSG publisher <strong>Jonathan Galassi</strong> said that Sontag &#8220;didn&#8217;t prepare the speech for publication&#8221; but that if the allegations prove true, a correction will be added in future printings. Meanwhile, Miller said to Calderone that she initially thought that Sontag &#8220;lifted my research&#8221; &#8211; committing what might amount to a literary misdemeanor. &#8220;When I actually sat down and read it,&#8221; she said, &#8220;it was more than that. The kind of irony is that it was in a lecture on morality and literature.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/several-figures-directly-included-in-speech_b4502#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/several-figures-directly-included-in-speech_b4502</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/several-figures-directly-included-in-speech_b4502</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lavagnino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Galassi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Calderone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[[Susan] Sontag]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 09:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chabon Gets Rewrites</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img>At the Wall Street Journal, Michael Chabon goes into extensive detail about the long gestation time of THE YIDDISH POLICEMAN&#8217;S UNION &#8211; and how the book, originally slated for publication in 2006, had to be rewritten pretty much from the ground up in about eight months. &#8220;I shudder now when I think that I would have published the old draft,&#8221; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117763122648184171-qJZn_1enVY_F6zJjUdO_QQlq9AI_20080425.html">Chabon told the WSJ&#8217;s <strong>Sam Schechner</strong></a>. Instead, he got back to work on what became a hybrid alternate history/crime novel, added a flashback structure and pared down the language into a hard-boiled, Yiddish-inflected patois. &#8220;I felt like I had to invent a whole new dialect of English to finish it,&#8221; Chabon said.</p>
<p>The article reveals just how high the stakes are: HarperCollins won the book in an auction 5 years ago based off a 1 and a half page proposal (when it was still called HOTZEPLOTZ) and to get the book to where it is now, Chabon&#8217;s editor, <strong>Courtney Hodell</strong> (now at <strong>FSG</strong>) would mail extensive manuscript notes and go through it line by line on trips to his Berkeley home.  And while Chabon said he sometimes had a &#8220;defensive reaction&#8221; to edits, he is thankful in retrospect that Hodell challenged him throughout the process, calling her the &#8220;redeemer of this novel&#8221; in his acknowledgments. &#8220;I do overwrite,&#8221; he says. &#8220;And this book needed a lot of chopping.&#8221;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/chabon-gets-rewrites_b4411#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/chabon-gets-rewrites_b4411</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/chabon-gets-rewrites_b4411</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Hodell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Schechner]]></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>One of the Easiest Answers Ever Published</title>
<description><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>&#8220;Why, why, why would a company publish a book this good and then practically demand that people not read it?&#8221; he asks. &#8220;Why not put the heroine on the jacketâ€¦ [and] &#8220;sell this baby a little?&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6429912.html"><strong>Stephen King</strong> on FIELDWORK by <strong>Mischa Berlinski</strong></a>, <em>Entertainment Weekly</em></li>
<li>&#8220;[H]ow do you sell someone as strange, original and indisputably non-American as <strong>Roberto Bolano</strong> in a U.S. market surrounded, as <strong>[Susan] Sontag</strong> once wrote, by a &#8220;wall of indifference to foreign literature&#8221; &#8212; a market in which&#8230;less than .5 percent of the books published are fiction in translation?&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/07/AR2007040701186.html"><strong>Bob Thompson</strong> on THE SAVAGE DETECTIVES by <strong>Roberto Bolano</strong></a>, <em>The Washington Post</em></li>
</ul>
<p>The answer: You&#8217;re <strong>FSG</strong>! Your name does all the work! Media comes to you, not the other way around! You don&#8217;t have to worry about selling oodles and oodles of copies because your name is your brand (something that <strong>HarperCollins</strong> and <strong>Random House</strong> would probably kill for, by the way.) You sit in your ivory towers and ruminate on why the general population can&#8217;t possibly understand the virtues of poetry and highbrow intelligentsia and make very, very sure to state over and over that, no we couldn&#8217;t <em>possibly</em> <a href="http://www.observer.com/20070312/20070312_Spencer_Morgan_pageone_newyorkworld.asp">publish chick lit in any way, shape or form</a>. Can&#8217;t anyone understand? Won&#8217;t those mainstream media nincompoops get with the program?! You&#8217;re FSG! You rule the literary Britannia!</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/one-of-the-easiest-answers-ever-published_b4251#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/one-of-the-easiest-answers-ever-published_b4251</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/one-of-the-easiest-answers-ever-published_b4251</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HarperCollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mischa Berlinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberto Bolano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[[Susan] Sontag]]></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Katherine Taylor  Falls Into Chick Lit Bait Trap</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.katherineTaylor .com/images/objects/img_kate1.jpg" class="alignright">In reading debut novelist <a href="http://observer.com/20070312/20070312_Spencer_Morgan_pageone_newyorkworld.asp"><strong>Katherine Taylor </strong>&#8216;s interview with the New York Observer&#8217;s <strong>Spencer Morgan</strong></a>, I couldn&#8217;t help but be reminded of the first time <strong>James Frey</strong> made headlines, long before any charges of fake writing and fabrication were levied his way. No, I&#8217;m talking about the interview where he railed against <strong>Dave Eggers</strong>&#8216;s A HEARTBREAKING WORK OF STAGGERING GENIUS <a href="http://gawker.com/news/james-frey/james-frey-and-dave-eggers-11734.php">in particularly profane terms</a>, and then it turned out that Frey, like so many men of his generation, is a casual f-bomb dropper without any real malice attached to it. So where do you think that first interview, the one that got Frey in so much trouble, ran? The <em>New York Observer</em>, of course!</p>
<p>So what <i>is</i> up with the salmon tabloid charming opinionated (at best) or incendiary (at worst) from young, impressionable writers? In Taylor &#8216;s case, perhaps it&#8217;s the constant dangling of the chick lit carrot what with her novel &#8211; published by <strong>FSG</strong> this May (and <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/authors/could_this_rookie_author_be_starbucks_next_choice_46296.asp">an early theorized candidate</a> for the <strong>Starbucks</strong> slot occupied by <strong>Ishmael Beah</strong>) &#8211; set amidst glamorous New York surroundings and adorned with the chicklit-standard cocktail glass, cigarettes and pink lettering. &#8220;But I love it,&#8221; she said. &#8220;It works, and I love that [the cover] looks like an old film still and that it&#8217;s an old-fashioned cocktail glass and that the woman is wearing dark nail polish, not something bright.&#8221; Besides, one has to cut Taylor  slack if only for her closing comment: &#8220;Indecision [by <strong>Benjamin Kunkel</strong>] was ridiculously simple, I thought. And had it been a girl who&#8217;d written it, it would have had the pinkest cover in the world. It would have been the pinkest of all-time pink covers.&#8221; Can&#8217;t argue with that&#8230;</p>
<p>New Career Opportunities Daily: The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/joblistings/?c=rss">best jobs in media</a>. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/katherine-taylor-falls-into-chick-lit-bait-trap_b4014#disqus_thread</comments>
<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/katherine-taylor-falls-into-chick-lit-bait-trap_b4014</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/katherine-taylor-falls-into-chick-lit-bait-trap_b4014</guid>
		<category><![CDATA[New & Upcoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Kunkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Eggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ishmael Beah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
