Supreme Court - TVNewser

Alito Hearings: “Stay With It”

Brian — Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:54:59 +0000

A sampling of yesterday’s viewer e-mails:

“I’m watching MSNBC for the Alito hearings today because CNN takes too many commercials. Right now CNN is skipping Sen. Kennedy’s questioning of Alito for commercials.”

“Why would CNN interview Charles Schumer about the Alito nomination and then go to a commercial break when Sen. Leahy is live and questioning Judge Alito?”

“CNN’s Daryn Kagan is showing a building about to be torn down, while Fox has the Alito hearings.”

Now we can add Brian Williams to the list of critics. On Wednesday afternoon he blogged:

“We also got a first-hand lesson (during our afternoon editorial meeting) in the art form of live coverage of a hearing: the moment the anchor on the cable network we happened to be watching felt the need to helpfully ‘explain’ what we were watching, we changed the channel to another that was just airing the hearing. Moments ago, while watching the hearing in my office, another cable network broke away (to cover ‘some of the other news of the day’) and so I broke away from them. I’ve always thought it should be a Cardinal rule: if you chose to invest in live coverage of an ongoing event, stay with it. If your audience has invested in watching it, it’s a good bet they don’t want to watch, or listen to, anything else. They know they have other channels at their disposal.”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Alito Hearings: Monday’s Cable

Brian — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 21:55:02 +0000

FNC: Chris Wallace will anchor FNC’s coverage beginning at noon. He’ll be joined by Brit Hume and Megyn Kendall. Brian Wilson will report live from the hearings. FOXNews.com will offer live streaming gavel-to-gavel coverage of the hearings, and FOX News Radio will have live anchored and unanchored coverage, too.

CNN: Wolf Blitzer must be coming home: He’s anchoring special editions of The Situation Room beginning at noon on Monday. (He’ll start at 9:30am on subsequent days.) Blitzer will be joined by Jeff Greenfield, Jeffrey Toobin, and others. CNN Pipeline is promoting its live streaming coverage “s well as replays of the highlights.”

MSNBC: Chris Matthews will man the anchor desk for MSNBC’s Alito coverage. He’ll be joined by Jon Meachem for “analysis and perspective.” Norah O’Donnell will report from the hearings and Pete Williams will stop by, too.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Miers Withdraws: Notes

Brian — Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:19:59 +0000

> E-mail coverage notes to tvnewser@mediabistro.com or use the tip box…

> ABC’s Good Morning America was the first network morning show to report the Miers news, at 8:56am. Update: 1:50pm: CBS had an across-the-board special report at 8:57am, a tipster says. NBC followed at 9am.

> Who was first on cable?

> Wolf Blitzer has been anchoring coverage in The Situation Room…

> FNC is awfully fond of these three-pieces: they’ve been placing live video in a large box, file video of Miers in the upper right, and live shots of the Supreme Court and White House in the lower right.

> Update: 1:50pm: An e-mailer asks: “So Fox News was bashing ‘The Situation Room’ when it premiered, and now that they see that it has potential to be a good program, they are copying the shows idea by placing lots of video on the screen all at once?”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

SCOTUS: “Magic Number Reached”

Brian — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:17:36 +0000

> Send coverage notes to tvnewser@mediabistro.com or use the tip box…

> FNC’s chyron: “Magic number reached, confirmation all but certain.”

> CNN placed Roberts’ photo on the lower left corner of the screen.

> At least on my TV, ABC was the only network to air a special report. “The next one is likely to be a bigger fight, but maybe President Bush can pull another rabbit out of his hat,” George Stephanopoulos said. Bob Woodruff anchored.

> FNC’s Brit Hume: “This is a very critical part of a President’s legacy.”

> CBSNews.com posted a breaking news banner that said Roberts had been confirmed before the Senate voted. It pulled the banner down a few minutes later.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Americans Should Be Able “To Watch The Workings” Of The Supreme Court

Brian — Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:00:35 +0000

Following up on John Roberts‘s comments last week about televising Supreme Court arguments:

“It is time for the Supreme Court to reverse its ban on cameras,” The Oregonian’s editorial board declares, and if Roberts is confirmed, he should lead the effort. “Americans should not just be allowed, but actively encouraged, to watch the workings of the most powerful court in the world.”

More: “It is absurd that Americans can sit for hours watching every last twist in a celebrity case such as Michael Jackson’s, or follow the arraignment of the runaway bride, but they could not see a single second of the historic arguments in the Bush v. Gore case that settled the disputed 2000 presidential election…”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Roberts Hearing: Nominee Comments On Media Rights & First Amendment

Brian — Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:07:27 +0000

Quoting MSNBC.com: “The government should not bar the media from recording events to which the public has access, such as the governmentâ€™s response and recovery effort from the effects of Hurricane Katrina, chief justice nominee John Roberts told the Senate Judiciary Committee.”

“There is great difficulty whenever you try to distinguish between public rights and media rights,” Roberts said. “If it’s a situation in which the public is being given access, you can’t discriminate against the media and say, as a general matter, that the media don’t have access, because their access rights, of course, correspond with those of the public.”

But Roberts added that he is not up to speed on First Amendment law or precedents, and he noted that there exist “some perfectly valid reasons for excluding media,” though he didn’t name them…

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Roberts Hearings: Nominee Won’t Commit To Televised Supreme Court Hearings

Brian — Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:51:33 +0000

Quoting C-SPAN’s press release: “Senator [Chuck] Grassely (R-IA) asked Judge John Roberts his views on including television cameras in the Supreme Court during his Senate confirmation hearings today.”

GRASSLEY: Are you against cameras in the courtroom like Justice Rehnquist was?

ROBERTS: Well, you know, my new best friend, Senator Thompson, assures me that television cameras are nothing to be afraid of. But I don’t have a set view on that. I do think it’s something that I would have to be — I would want to listen to the views if I were confirmed to my colleagues.

“Americans can watch every event of national importance on television except for oral arguments at the Supreme Court,” Sen. Russ Feingold weighed in. “If you’re confirmed, you will be essentially disappearing from public view. This hearing will in some ways be the last time that the nation will see you at work…I think it would benefit the country and the court if all Americans had a chance to see the court conduct its work.”

But Roberts still wouldn’t answer the question definitively…

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Roberts Hearings: A Fascinating Moment

Brian — Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:18:30 +0000

Until today, Americans had only listened to brief comments from Judge John Roberts, Brit Hume pointed out on FNC this afternoon. “We have no real sense of the man from what we’ve been able to see. Today we’ll have a much more extended version of his thinking. He’ll introduce himself to us, really, for the first time.”

Hume told Chris Wallace: “And unlike these senators, nearly all of whose statements have been distributed ahead of time, were written in advance and were reading, as you saw, with Senator Kennedy in particular and others as well, reading basically from prepared text, Judge Roberts is supposed to speak without a text. Now how extemporaneous will be really and how much he has memorized is something that, who knows. But we’ll get a sense of how agile he is. And it may be that he has chosen to do it this way so that he can pick up on points that have been raised in some of the — in some of the statements made by the senators.

But I think it’s going to be — that will be the moment to really watch. Because that will be fascinating.”

…

What are your impressions of the hearing coverage? E-mail tvnewser@mediabistro.com or drop it in the tip box…

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Judge Roberts Hearings: “Tree Falling In The Forest & No One Hears?”

Brian — Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:50:33 +0000

The confirmation hearings for Judge John Roberts will receive limited coverage as news nets focus on the aftermath of Katrina, Variety says.

“Democrats are sure to frame their questions provocatively, but with no coverage, it’s like the tree falling in the forest and no one hears,” Paul Waldman, senior fellow at the liberal Media Matters for America, complains.

“When the Senate hearings begin this morning, the cable news networks plan to dip in and out after carrying some opening statements,” Howard Kurtz adds.

> PBS, Court TV and C-SPAN3 will carry the hearings live…

> FOXNews.com is touting live coverage online…

> Brian Williams will be anchoring some coverage on MSNBC…

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Rehnquist: Networks Air Bush Comments

Brian — Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:07:41 +0000

A tipster says: “All 3 networks broke in Sunday morning for the president’s remarks on the passing of Rehnquist. CBS was first anchored by Harry Smith in New York and Bob Schieffer in Washington. ABC and NBC were close behind with George Stephanopoulos and Lester Holt anchoring respectively.”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Rehnquist: CNN Beats FNC By Eight Min.

Brian — Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:03:51 +0000

CNN’s newsroom was buzzing at 11pm as staffers sought confirmation of the news of Rehnquist’s death. Carol Lin broke the news to the world at 11:06:23pm ET.

Meanwhile, CNNers in Atlanta watched Fox News air tape: Of Greta, of Hannity, of Geraldo. (It’s not unfair to say there was some glee.) MSNBC broke in with Cheryl Casone at 11:12:20pm. FNC followed at 11:14:10…

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Rehnquist: Who’s The Real News Network?

Brian — Sun, 04 Sep 2005 11:59:14 +0000

Some of the late-night comments from tipsters:

> “CNN is still live at 11pm with Carol Lin in Atlanta and reporters live in the gulf coast area. MSNBC and FNC are done for the night.”

> “CNN broke in with the story of the death of William Rehnquiest at 11:06:22 pm ET.”

> “CNN is live, good thing since Chief Rehnquist just passed away. MS and Fox are on tape. Who is the real news network?”

> “FNC is finally on at 11:14 pm with Carol in the newsroom and Greta live.”

> “CNN blew MSNBC and FOX out of the water with the Rehnquist news by several minutes.”

> “The news of Rehnquist’s death came just minutes into CNN Saturday Night — they ran an obituary by Bruce Morton.”

> “It’s the BIG stories that sets CNN apart from the competition. I am watching CNN and the others on the death of Rehnquist and see CNN providing much more thoughtful insight to the story than anyone else. It’s almost like FNC and MSNBC struggle to keep the story on the air. CNN has numerous close friends from the past doing phone interviews.”

> “CNN has coverage with Carol Lin. MSNBC (NBC) has coverage with Cheryl Casone. MSNBC has Chris Matthews via phone. FNC has coverage with Carol Iovanna and Greta Van Susteren / Susan Estrich on the phone.”

> “While CNN was the first to break the passing of Chief Justice Rehnquist on air, MSNBC had it online first. CNN and Fox (and ABC and CBS) took ages to get this story to their pages. It seems when it comes to the web, MSNBC is the leader.”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Roberts: Popular Among D.C. Journos

Brian — Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:22:16 +0000

ABC’s must-read Note believes Roberts was “THE best handled and well-researched” nominee process ever, and says the Dem’s strategy of “relative reticence to say anything declarative…sent out the impression that they did not know what to think and were confused about what to say.” But this is the most interesting graf:

“The factor we think most likely to ensure Judge Roberts’ confirmation: that the Washington establishment, and the media establishment, know him and like him. Do not underestimate how hard it will be for Democrats to tar a potential nominee who has given working Washington journalists his cell phone number and who is generally seen as a mensch.”

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

The Nominee: “Well-Planned” By The WH

Brian — Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:46:26 +0000

> “For eight dizzying hours yesterday, media outlets plunged themselves into Supreme speculation, with anchors and reporters blathering on about the president’s likely high court pick, until the collective chatter moved on to other potential nominees,” Howard Kurtz writes. He says a “shoot-from-the-lip environment ruled cable news.”

> USAT’s Peter Johnson: The timing “certainly illustrates that one of the great powers of the presidency is the power to change the subject,” Court TV News anchor Fred Graham said. “Bush was back on his heels over Karl Rove, and this announcement wipes Rove off the front pages, for a time.”

> “As a prime-time television event, it was well-planned by the White House: short, sweet and without a large piece of air time given over to any real analysis,” Tim Cuprisin writes.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

Brian — Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:44:37 +0000

Associated Press photo: Sen. Charles Schumer and Sen. Patrick Leahy speak as President Bush announces John Roberts.

New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.