TVSpy LostRemote AgencySpy PRNewser FishbowlNY FishbowlDC SocialTimes AllFacebook 10,000 Words GalleyCat UnBeige MediaJobsDaily

Examining the NYT’s “Examination”

analysts_5-14.jpgRemember the 7,500-word New York Times “examination” of military television analysts and their involvement with the Pentagon? The Huffington Post’s Rachel Sklar spends 3,000 words examining the NYT’s examination.

Her findings — “They proved their case against the Pentagon, hands down. But they did not prove their case against the generals and other military men whom they name-dropped in that story. Which means they did not necessarily prove their case against the networks.”

• The Pentagon case was proven by, “forcing the Pentagon to (finally) release the 8,000 pages of transcript.”

• The case against the military men themselves was not, because, “he painted with way too broad a brush.”

• The network argument was not proven either, Sklar writes, because, even though the, “networks fumbled this ball by not addressing the story head on,” the story made, “sweeping statements about network culpability.”

That’s the crux of the argument — check the full piece for far more detail.

Related: Media Matters breaks down the 4,500 appearances by the military analyst’s named.

Mediabistro Course

Create Quick Video for the Web

Create Quick Video for the WebLearn how to shoot, edit, and encode online video! Starting October 4, write video scripts and story outlines, shoot and edit film, and broadcast your work on video-sharing sites like YouTube and Vimeo. Students will get hands-on experience with a Canon HDV camera and Final Cut in this course. Register now!