The News Keeps Breaking And Breaking…

Seven days ago, TVNewser asked: “When does breaking news become broken?” CNN’s abuse of the “breaking news” banner seemed to diminish after the post, but by this weekend it was back with a vengeance. An e-mailer asks:

“Granted, most cable news has become sensational to the point of absurdity in recent years, but has anyone else noticed that most of the cable networks — particularly CNN — seem to be abusing the ‘Breaking News’ moniker since the Lebanon situation broke nearly two weeks ago?

While a major event — such as a full-scale Israeli invasion of Lebanon or a series of dramatic Hez attacks — would be significant from the norm of the generally-known situation in the region right now, why is a two-week-old story still promoted as ‘breaking’? Short of major new developments in the situation, should there still be a ‘breaking news’ graphic on the screen?

This leads me to wonder, aside from using the term as a magnet for channel surfers to attract eyeballs to support understandable business goals of the news networks, what *should* constitute the use of the ‘breaking’ news graphic? And, does anyone think this practice is being abused by the news channels simply to attract more viewers?”

Launch a social media campaign that will build your brand and deliver results in our online Social Media Marketing Boot Camp starting June 7. Speakers include Abigail Cusick (Bravo Digital), Gregory Galant (Sawhorse Media), Alex Leo (Thomson Reuters Digital), Jim Tobin (Ignite Social Media), and many more. Read the reviews.