AuraOne is hiring: Technical Writing Specialist in New York

Technical Writing Specialist is a remote evaluation track for reviewing technical writing evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Category: Frontier Model Evaluation · Pay: Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor

Technical Writing Specialist is a remote evaluation track for reviewing technical writing evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric.

Role details
About the role
Technical Writing Specialist is a remote evaluation track for reviewing technical writing evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.
AI data reviewers help turn technical writing evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.
Review frontier model outputs. Judge benchmark failures and calibrate other evaluators.

Responsibilities

Evaluate technical writing evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Technical Writing Specialist assignments.

Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.

Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.

Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.

Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.Track Evaluation & annotation Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process. Eligible from US

What you should bring

Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on technical writing evaluation or adjacent content for Technical Writing Specialist work.

Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.

Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.

Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.

Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

Compare two technical writing evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.

Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.

Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Useful experience

Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.

Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.

Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Compensation and schedule
Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

Model output evaluation

Rubric-based annotation

Severity tagging

Inter-rater calibration

Technical Writing evaluation

#J-18808-Ljbffr