Actually, now that we've made fun of it, there appears to be a nugget of news in the Bob Novak speech yesterday: Novak is "confident" that Bob Woodward's source is the same one who originally gave Novak the information.

So, positing that Novak's source spoke with the Grand Jury, shouldn't he or she disclosed the conversation with Woodward? Or was the source confident that Woodward would never admit learning the info?

If so, is Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation heading towards more indictments for incomplete and misleading testimony re: disclosing speaking with Woodward?