To the Editor
If you strip away the bombast, the recycled anecdotes and the mistakes an elementary fact-checking should have caught (“1300 reporters” is off by about 800), you are left with Mark Bowden’s attempt at an original thesis. His thesis is this: Arthur Sulzberger believes that “journalism pays.” He actually believes that its value is not only civic, but commercial. Ho, ho. How naive of him. Journalism doesn’t pay.
*Update* Mark Bowden responds in the comments section.
Last year readers paid The New York Times more than $600 million to buy our newspaper. In a world of declining everything, our circulation revenue has gone up. That’s people paying good money for good journalism. And it buys us time to answer the existential question of our business, which is how we assure that journalism continues to pay. I’ll bet on Arthur Sulzberger finding the answer to that question before Mark Bowden does.
The New York Times
Bloomberg LP is looking for a Project Manager - Mobile. next job M Booth is looking for a Senior Account Supervisor. next job Sharethrough is looking for a Sales Manager. next job AS IF Media Group is looking for a Project Manager. next job Metro New York is looking for a News Reporter. next job Time Inc. is looking for a Social Media Editor - RealSimple.com. next job CNBC is looking for a Content Editor CNBC Digital. next job Lawdragon.com is looking for a Web Developer. next job 5W Public Relations is looking for a Senior Manager, SEO. next job Wenner Media is looking for a Consumer Marketing Assistant. see all
We’re offering $100 off either AllFacebook Marketing Conference, or AllTwitter Marketing Conference and $200 off a Combo Pass to attend both events. We’ve secured an A-List roster of social media strategists from Toyota, Mashable, the Oakland Raiders, the San Francisco Giants, and more. This offer expires at midnight, so register now with the code ONEDAY and save.