Mediabistro Logo Mediabistro Logo
  • Jobs
    Search Creative Jobs Hot Jobs Remote Media Jobs Create Job Alerts
    Job Categories
    Creative & Design Marketing & Communications Operations & Strategy Production Sales & Business Development Writing & Editing
    Quick Links
    Search All Jobs Remote Jobs Create Job Alerts
  • Career Resources
    Career Advice & Articles Media Industry News Media Career Interviews Creative Tools Resume Writing Services Interview Coaching Job Market Insights Member Profiles
  • Mediabistro Membership
    Membership Overview How to Pitch (Premium Tool) Editorial Calendars (Premium Access) Courses & Training Programs Membership FAQ
  • Showcase
    Featured Creative Stories Submit your Story
  • Log In
Post Jobs
Mediabistro Logo Mediabistro Logo
Search Creative Jobs Hot Jobs Remote Media Jobs Create Job Alerts
Job Categories
Creative & Design Marketing & Communications Operations & Strategy Production Sales & Business Development Writing & Editing
Quick Links
Search All Jobs Remote Jobs Create Job Alerts
Career Advice & Articles Media Industry News Media Career Interviews Creative Tools Resume Writing Services Interview Coaching Job Market Insights Member Profiles
Membership Overview How to Pitch (Premium Tool) Editorial Calendars (Premium Access) Courses & Training Programs Membership FAQ
Featured Creative Stories Submit your Story
Log In
Post Jobs
Log In | Sign Up

Follow Us!

Hot Jobs

Today’s Top Media Jobs: Editorial Leadership & Entry-Level Opportunities

hot media and creative jobs
Miles icon
By Miles Jennings
@milesworks
Miles Jennings is CEO of Mediabistro and its parent CognoGroup. He previously founded and led Recruiter.com through its NASDAQ listing, executing more than 10 acquisitions over nearly a decade as CEO and COO.
2 min read • Originally published February 10, 2026 / Updated March 20, 2026
Miles icon
By Miles Jennings
@milesworks
Miles Jennings is CEO of Mediabistro and its parent CognoGroup. He previously founded and led Recruiter.com through its NASDAQ listing, executing more than 10 acquisitions over nearly a decade as CEO and COO.
2 min read • Originally published February 10, 2026 / Updated March 20, 2026

The media industry continues to prove that its strongest investments lie in two critical areas: nurturing tomorrow’s talent and elevating editorial leadership. Today’s media job landscape reveals organizations doubling down on both ends of the career spectrum, from internship programs designed to build the next generation of storytellers to senior editorial roles that demand seasoned expertise.

What stands out most prominently is how organizations are crafting roles that bridge traditional media boundaries. Companies are seeking professionals who can navigate multiple platforms, understand diverse audiences, and contribute to both content creation and strategic thinking. The emphasis on collaborative editorial work and cross-departmental support suggests media companies are moving away from siloed operations toward more integrated approaches to content and community building.

Standout Opportunities Today

Poets & Writers, Inc. – Deputy Editor, Poets & Writers Magazine

What Makes This Special: We’re excited to post this role because we discussed this prestigious organization as one of our top resources for writers. This senior editorial position offers the rare opportunity to shape literary culture across multiple platforms. The role combines traditional magazine editing with digital strategy and oversight of premium newsletters, making it perfect for editors who want to influence how literary content reaches and engages modern audiences.

What They’re Seeking:

  • Senior editorial experience with flagship publication oversight
  • Cross-platform content strategy capabilities
  • Collaborative leadership skills for editorial team guidance
  • Flexibility for hybrid office and remote work arrangements

Apply to the Deputy Editor position →

Hearst Television – News Intern (Summer 2026)

Why This Matters: KCCI 8 News is offering comprehensive newsroom exposure across News, Sports, and Weather departments. This internship stands out for its emphasis on community-impact storytelling and hands-on experience in daily news operations, providing invaluable foundational training for a career in broadcast journalism.

Key Focus Areas:

  • Direct support for producers, reporters, anchors, and meteorologists
  • Research and story development assistance
  • Multi-departmental newsroom operations experience
  • Community-focused journalism approach

Apply to the News Intern program →

Market Insights for Strategic Job Seekers

The current hiring patterns reveal that media organizations value professionals who can wear multiple hats while maintaining expertise in their core areas. Companies like Hearst Television are investing heavily in talent development, while specialized publications like Poets & Writers are seeking leaders who understand both editorial excellence and audience development across platforms.

For job seekers, the actionable insight is clear: develop your cross-platform storytelling abilities while deepening your specialized skills. Whether you’re entering the field or advancing your career, demonstrate how you can contribute to both content creation and audience engagement. Organizations are hiring for roles that require editorial judgment, collaborative leadership, and the ability to adapt traditional media skills to evolving digital landscapes.

Looking for more opportunities? Browse all media jobs on Mediabistro and keep in touch with our hot job roundups for additional openings.

Topics:

Hot Jobs
Advice From the Pros

Why Creative Portfolios Are Failing ATS Screening — and the Two-Document Fix

A 47-page award-winning portfolio scores zero keyword matches. The system isn't broken, it was never built to read your work.

online creative portfolio
Miles icon
By Miles Jennings
@milesworks
Miles Jennings is CEO of Mediabistro and its parent CognoGroup. He previously founded and led Recruiter.com through its NASDAQ listing, executing more than 10 acquisitions over nearly a decade as CEO and COO.
6 min read • Originally published March 11, 2026 / Updated March 20, 2026
Miles icon
By Miles Jennings
@milesworks
Miles Jennings is CEO of Mediabistro and its parent CognoGroup. He previously founded and led Recruiter.com through its NASDAQ listing, executing more than 10 acquisitions over nearly a decade as CEO and COO.
6 min read • Originally published March 11, 2026 / Updated March 20, 2026

A designer submits a portfolio PDF containing 47 pages of award-winning campaign work. The applicant tracking system scores it at zero keywords matched.

Not because the work is bad. Because the system extracted zero readable text.

Creative professionals communicate visually. The gatekeeping technology at most employers, however, usually communicates exclusively in plain text. These two languages are fundamentally incompatible, and the gap is widening as more creative employers adopt enterprise ATS platforms for application volume management and AI-assisted screening.

Inside the Machine: How ATS Parsers Process Your Files

Enterprise ATS platforms like Workday, iCIMS, Greenhouse, and Lever process uploaded documents through text extraction. They strip formatting, ignore visual elements, and read raw text strings.

Your portfolio PDF hits the parser. The system attempts to extract characters. If your file contains heavy image content, layered graphics from InDesign exports, or embedded fonts rendered as graphics, the parser produces nothing.

Think of it as handing a beautifully designed poster to someone who can only read Braille. The visual information doesn’t register.

Critical Reality: ATS parsers don’t “see” your design. They scan for extractable text. Images, graphics, and certain PDF export settings produce zero parseable content, meaning your portfolio registers as a blank document.

In many employer configurations, the portfolio upload field feeds into the same parser as the resume field. Your visual PDF gets treated like a text document. The system expects words, sentences, standard formatting. It encounters image layers and vector graphics instead.

The parser fails silently. No error message. Your application enters the queue with a keyword match score of zero.

Why External Portfolio Links Don’t Save You

ATS platforms do not crawl URLs. Your Behance profile, Dribbble gallery, or personal website link might be visible to a human reviewer, but the automated screening that determines whether a human ever sees your application ignores those links entirely.

File size creates another barrier. Systems often cap uploads between 5 and 10 MB, though limits vary by employer and platform. High-resolution portfolio PDFs blow past these thresholds routinely. Many systems discard oversized files without notification.

Even text you believe is extractable may not be. Headers, footers, content inside tables, text boxes: the parser frequently skips or scrambles all of them. Project descriptions embedded as text overlays on images? Rasterized. To the parser, they’re pixels.

The hiring manager sees a list of candidates ranked by keyword match. Your name sits at the bottom, flagged as “incomplete application” or buried under hundreds of candidates whose documents parsed cleanly.

This is the documented technical behavior of text-extraction-based ATS platforms, and it explains why qualified creatives applying for creative director jobs, UX designer roles, and art director positions report submitting dozens of applications with zero responses.

The Keyword Gap You Don’t Know You Have

ATS keyword matching scores candidates on exact or close-match terms pulled from job descriptions. The system looks for software proficiencies (Figma, After Effects, Sketch), methodologies (design thinking, agile, user testing), deliverable types (wireframes, prototypes, style guides), and industry-specific terms.

Portfolios are built to show. ATS scores what you say.

If your portfolio demonstrates Figma mastery through screenshots and case studies but never contains the word “Figma” in extractable text, the system doesn’t register it. Visual proof is irrelevant to the algorithm.

How Creative Role Vocabulary Is Shifting

A designer who built a portfolio around “brand identity” and “visual design” finds that postings now emphasize “design systems,” “component libraries,” and “design ops.” The work is the same. The vocabulary has changed. The ATS filters on vocabulary.

Employers increasingly describe outcomes and business impact in job descriptions. Your portfolio might showcase stunning work, but if the accompanying text doesn’t frame projects in terms of conversion rates, engagement metrics, or user retention, you’re missing the keywords the ATS was told to prioritize.

The consequence: creatives who excel at visual storytelling but neglect written framing face a structural disadvantage in automated screening, regardless of portfolio quality. The fix isn’t to make your work less creative. It’s to frame your projects in language that maps to how employers describe these roles.

The Two-Document Strategy That Gets You Past the Filter

The solution separates what the machine needs from what the human needs. Two documents, two audiences, one application.

Strategy 1: Separate Your Portfolio from Your Application

Submit an ATS-optimized plain-text or simple-format resume as your primary document. Keep your portfolio as a supplementary link or attachment.

A UX designer applies for an in-house role. She creates a .docx resume with project titles, tools, and deliverable types in plain text. The resume includes a portfolio URL in the header and again in the work experience section, contextualized with project descriptions.

The ATS parses the resume cleanly, scoring keyword matches on “Figma,” “user research,” “A/B testing,” and “responsive design.” She advances to human review. The hiring manager clicks the portfolio link and evaluates the visual work.

The portfolio still matters enormously. But it matters at the right stage, after the automated filter has already passed you through.

Strategy 2: Add a Plain-Text Portfolio Summary to Your Resume

Include a dedicated section listing project names, client names where permitted, deliverable types, tools used, and measurable outcomes. This gives the parser extractable content that maps to job description keywords while pointing the human reviewer to the visual work.

Portfolio Summary Example: “Redesigned onboarding flow for fintech SaaS client using Figma and Maze; conducted 12 moderated user tests; reduced drop-off by 34% in first two screens.” One line. Parseable. Keyword-rich. Specific.

The portfolio shows how beautiful the redesign looks. The resume tells the ATS what tools you used, what methods you applied, what impact you delivered. Both documents work together.

Strategy 3: Test Before You Submit

Run your documents through a tool like Jobscan, or copy-paste your PDF into a plain text editor to see what the parser will see. If the text editor shows garbled characters, blank space, or only metadata, the ATS will encounter the same problem.

A graphic designer discovers her InDesign-exported PDF renders as 200 characters of metadata in plain text. She re-exports using the “accessible PDF” option with text layers intact and recovers 1,400 words of project descriptions. The file size drops from 12 MB to 4 MB. She tests again. Clean extraction. The ATS scores her at 78% keyword match. She advances.

Testing takes three minutes. That’s the difference between invisibility and consideration.

Five Application Mistakes That Trigger Auto-Rejection

  • Mistake 1: Submitting a portfolio PDF as your only application document. The system may parse it as blank, scoring you at zero keyword matches before a human ever sees your name.
  • Mistake 2: Relying on external portfolio links without supporting text. ATS platforms don’t crawl URLs. Your Behance page is invisible to automated screening. The link only helps after you’ve passed the filter.
  • Mistake 3: Embedding project descriptions as text within images or graphic layouts. Rasterized text isn’t text to a parser. The system extracts nothing.
  • Mistake 4: Using creative section headers that don’t map to standard field recognition. “My Superpower” instead of “Skills” may charm a reader, but the parser expects standard resume structure.
  • Mistake 5: Ignoring file size limits and assuming a rejected upload will trigger an error. Many systems silently discard oversized files. You submit, receive a confirmation email, and never realize your portfolio didn’t reach the database.

Every one of these is fixable. The fix requires accepting that your application faces two evaluators: an algorithm that reads text, and a human who appreciates design. Optimize for both.

For additional guidance on structuring portfolio content, consider how project framing and case study structure can serve both audiences simultaneously.

What to Do With This

Two documents. Two audiences. One application.

Create an ATS-optimized resume with a portfolio summary section. Test it in plain text. Include your portfolio URL. Submit the resume as your primary document. Let your visual work speak when it reaches human eyes.

The demand for creative talent remains strong. Recent creative leadership appointments across major agencies signal continued growth in creative director jobs and similar roles. The market for visual skills matters as much as ever. But getting your work in front of decision-makers requires navigating automated screening. The best portfolio in the world doesn’t help if the system never sees it.

Browse creative jobs on Mediabistro where you can put this two-document strategy into practice. If you’re hiring creative talent, post your open roles to connect with qualified professionals.

The technology isn’t changing. Your approach can.

Topics:

Advice From the Pros
Advice From the Pros

The Media Buying Careers That Are Actually Getting Hired Right Now

Ad budgets are scattering into streaming, DOOH and experiential. The roles in demand look very different than they did a year ago.

professional resume for your first job
Miles icon
By Miles Jennings
@milesworks
Miles Jennings is CEO of Mediabistro and its parent CognoGroup. He previously founded and led Recruiter.com through its NASDAQ listing, executing more than 10 acquisitions over nearly a decade as CEO and COO.
5 min read • Originally published March 19, 2026 / Updated March 20, 2026
Miles icon
By Miles Jennings
@milesworks
Miles Jennings is CEO of Mediabistro and its parent CognoGroup. He previously founded and led Recruiter.com through its NASDAQ listing, executing more than 10 acquisitions over nearly a decade as CEO and COO.
5 min read • Originally published March 19, 2026 / Updated March 20, 2026

If your media career was built on mastering a single platform, the job description has changed.

Advertising budgets are scattering. Social feeds are crowded. Brands are pouring money into digital out-of-home, streaming, experiential and live-event campaigns, and they want people who can connect all of those pieces. The job now is figuring out how DOOH drives mobile behavior, how streaming fits into a broader video strategy, and how first-party data shows up in places it never has before.

That shift is visible in the listings on Mediabistro. Roles that once read as straightforward “paid media manager” or “media planner” positions now routinely ask for cross-channel fluency, programmatic experience, and the ability to tie campaign performance back to business outcomes. The single-channel specialist posting hasn’t disappeared, but it’s no longer the default.

noahTo understand what these shifts mean for the people actually doing the work, we talked to Noah Everist, VP of Sales Development at Brkthru, a digital media solutions company that works across 25+ platforms for mid-market agencies and brands. Brkthru has landed on the Inc. 5000 list for four consecutive years and serves more than 1,000 active brands. Everist has spent two decades in digital advertising, including nearly a decade at Goodway Group, where he oversaw strategy, P&L and a team of 16 for one of the agency’s largest accounts.

His read on where things are heading? The roles in demand look different than they did even a year ago.

Cross-Channel Thinking Is the New Specialty

The biggest hiring shift Everist sees is a move away from channel-specific experts and toward people who can think across the entire media plan.

“It’s less about being ‘the DOOH person’ or ‘the streaming expert’ and more about understanding how those pieces actually work together,” Everist said. “For example, planners who can connect a DOOH placement to mobile behavior or retail outcomes are really valuable right now.”

He also pointed to growing demand for people who can activate first-party data in channels where it hasn’t traditionally lived, like out-of-home and experiential. “That’s creating roles that feel a little more like systems thinkers than classic media planners,” he said.

This tracks with what’s happening across digital marketing management more broadly. The role of a digital marketing manager has expanded from managing a handful of channels to orchestrating an entire ecosystem, and media buyers are feeling the same pressure. The professionals who can speak fluently across paid search, programmatic display, CTV, and social are the ones getting callbacks.

For anyone wondering what “channel-agnostic strategy” actually looks like on the ground, Everist kept it simple: start with the audience and the outcome. Figure out the platform after.

“Platform expertise still matters, but it’s not the main thing anymore,” he said. “The more valuable skill is being able to connect the dots. How does streaming support social? What role does DOOH play in incremental reach?”

AI Is Reorganizing Teams From the Inside

On the AI side, Everist described something that should be encouraging for media professionals worried about automation. Teams are getting restructured, and the new shape actually has more room for strategic thinking.

“AI is taking a lot of the repetitive work off people’s plates, things like versioning creative, managing bids, or pulling basic reports,” he said. “What happens in practice is teams spend less time executing and more time actually thinking.”

The new roles emerging around AI are focused on guiding the tools. People who know how to get the right outputs from AI systems, train those systems on brand voice, and sense-check what they produce are increasingly in demand. It’s a pattern showing up across media and marketing: the creative director role, for instance, has evolved from primarily art-directing campaigns to orchestrating workflows where AI handles production and humans handle judgment.

“The teams aren’t necessarily smaller,” Everist said. “They’re just built differently, with more focus on oversight and orchestration.”

Your Short-Form Skills Travel

For media pros who built their careers on short-form social content, platform turbulence can feel personal. TikTok’s uncertain regulatory status is the latest example, but it applies to any channel that could shift overnight. Everist’s advice: stop identifying with a single platform.

“The skill was never really TikTok,” he said. “It’s understanding how to capture attention in a short-form environment. That translates pretty easily to Reels, Shorts, and whatever comes next.”

That’s a useful reframe for anyone in a social media management role who feels tethered to a single platform’s algorithm. The underlying skill set, audience instinct, content pacing, trend responsiveness, translates across every short-form surface. The platform is just the distribution layer.

He added that the professionals in the strongest position are the ones pairing creative instinct with analytical chops. “Knowing what works is great. Knowing why it works and how to adapt it quickly is what sets people apart.”

Live Events Are Creating Flexible Work

With major cultural tentpoles (the World Cup, the Super Bowl, award shows, major league playoffs) driving precision-targeted campaigns, brands are rethinking how they staff around live moments. Everist said it’s producing a blend of permanent and project-based work.

“Live moments need people who can move quickly, monitor what’s happening, and adjust in real time,” he said. “That often leads to more project-based or flexible support around big events.”

At the same time, brands are investing in core teams that build the strategy and playbooks in advance. The result is a steady foundation with surge capacity layered on top when the moment hits. For freelancers and contract media pros, that’s a real pipeline of work, and it’s one of the reasons influencer marketing and event-driven media roles have grown so quickly. Brands need people who understand both the creative and the logistics of activating around a live moment.

The Biggest Misconception in Media Buying Right Now

When asked for the single biggest misconception advertisers have right now, Everist didn’t hesitate: “Probably that things are going to settle down.”

“The reality is fragmentation across channels, data, and consumer behavior is still accelerating,” he said. “Waiting for things to simplify isn’t really a strategy.”

For media professionals, that fragmentation is the opportunity. The more complex things get, the more valuable the people who can make sense of it become.

“The brands doing this well are the ones staying flexible,” Everist said. “They’re testing more, moving budgets faster, and building plans that can actually adapt.”

Same advice applies to careers. The professionals who will thrive are the ones willing to move across channels, pick up new tools, and get comfortable with the idea that things will keep shifting. The ones who adapt will be the ones who get hired.

Browse open media buying and planning jobs on Mediabistro, or explore roles in marketing and communications. If you’re hiring for media roles, post your job on Mediabistro to reach candidates with the cross-channel experience Everist describes.

Topics:

Advice From the Pros
LA

Biggest plays in San Francisco Giants history

Biggest plays in San Francisco Giants history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

RCPPHOTO // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in San Francisco Giants history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in San Francisco Giants history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#10. October 10, 1924 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 3-1 (8th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: WSH
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Flyball: LF (Short LF)
– cWPA: 14.64%

#9. October 08, 1962 (WS Gm 4)
– Score: tied 2-2 (7th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep RF); J. Davenport Scores; M. Alou Scores; E. Bowman Scores
– cWPA: 15.59%

#8. October 29, 2014 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 3-2 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: KC
– Event: Out
– Play Description: *ENDED GAME*:Foul Popfly: 3B (3B into Foul Terr.)
– cWPA: 15.90%

#7. October 03, 1962 (Gm nan)
– Score: tied 4-4 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: LAD
– Event: BB
– Play Description: Walk; Alou Scores; Mays to 3B; Bailey to 2B
– cWPA: 16.41%

#6. October 16, 1912 (WS Gm 8)
– Score: down 2-1 (10th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Flyball: CF (Deep CF)
– cWPA: 16.48%

#5. October 06, 1933 (WS Gm 4)
– Score: down 2-1 (11th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: WSH
– Event: Out
– Play Description: *ENDED GAME*:Ground Ball Double Play: SS-2B-1B
– cWPA: 19.86%

#4. October 10, 1924 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 3-3 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: WSH
– Event: 3B
– Play Description: Triple to CF (Line Drive to Deep CF-RF)
– cWPA: 22.78%

#3. October 16, 1912 (WS Gm 8)
– Score: tied 1-1 (10th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to CF; R. Murray Scores; F. Merkle to 2B (Advanced on throw) on E8
– cWPA: 29.15%

#2. October 10, 1924 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 3-3 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: WSH
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Ground Ball Double Play: SS-2B-1B
– cWPA: 32.81%

#1. October 03, 1951 (Gm nan)
– Score: down 4-2 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: LAD
– Event: HR
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Home Run (Line Drive to Deep LF); Hartung Scores; Lockman Scores
– cWPA: 35.56%

Topics:

LA
LA

Biggest plays in San Diego Padres history

Biggest plays in San Diego Padres history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

Grindstone Media Group // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in San Diego Padres history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in San Diego Padres history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#5. October 17, 1998 (WS Gm 1)
– Score: tied 2-2 (5th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Line Drive to Deep RF); Q. Veras Scores
– cWPA: 7.72%

#4. October 07, 1984 (NLCS Gm 5)
– Score: down 3-2 (7th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: CHC
– Event: RoE
– Play Description: Reached on E3 (Ground Ball); C. Martínez Scores/No RBI
– cWPA: 9.94%

#3. October 06, 1984 (NLCS Gm 4)
– Score: tied 5-5 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: CHC
– Event: HR
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Home Run (Deep CF-RF); T. Gwynn Scores
– cWPA: 10.09%

#2. October 10, 1984 (WS Gm 2)
– Score: down 3-2 (5th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: DET
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run; G. Nettles Scores; T. Kennedy Scores
– cWPA: 10.89%

#1. October 07, 1984 (NLCS Gm 5)
– Score: tied 3-3 (7th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: CHC
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to CF; T. Flannery Scores (Unearned run); A. Wiggins Scores; T. Gwynn to 3B (Advanced on throw) on throw to Hm
– cWPA: 14.04%

Topics:

LA
NYC

Biggest plays in New York Mets history

Biggest plays in New York Mets history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

RCPPHOTO // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in New York Mets history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in New York Mets history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#10. October 27, 1986 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 6-5 (8th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Lineout: 2B
– cWPA: 10.15%

#9. October 21, 2000 (WS Gm 1)
– Score: tied 3-3 (10th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Ground Ball Double Play: 2B-SS-1B (SS-2B)
– cWPA: 10.68%

#8. October 12, 1969 (WS Gm 2)
– Score: tied 1-1 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: BAL
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to LF; E. Charles Scores; J. Grote to 2B
– cWPA: 10.77%

#7. October 14, 1973 (WS Gm 2)
– Score: tied 6-6 (12th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: OAK
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to CF; B. Harrelson Scores; T. McGraw to 2B
– cWPA: 10.81%

#6. October 04, 1988 (NLCS Gm 1)
– Score: down 2-1 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: LAD
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to CF (Line Drive); D. Strawberry Scores; K. McReynolds Scores
– cWPA: 11.28%

#5. October 11, 1986 (NLCS Gm 3)
– Score: down 5-4 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: HOU
– Event: HR
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep RF Line); W. Backman Scores
– cWPA: 13.79%

#4. October 25, 1986 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: tied 5-5 (10th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: RoE
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Reached on E3 (Ground Ball); R. Knight Scores (Unearned run)
– cWPA: 21.46%

#3. October 27, 1986 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 3-3 (7th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep LF-CF)
– cWPA: 21.58%

#2. October 25, 1986 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: down 5-4 (10th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: WP
– Play Description: Wild Pitch; K. Mitchell Scores; R. Knight to 2B
– cWPA: 22.33%

#1. October 27, 1986 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 3-0 (6th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: BOS
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to CF (Line Drive to LF-CF); L. Mazzilli Scores; M. Wilson Scores; T. Teufel to 3B
– cWPA: 22.38%

Topics:

NYC
NYC

Biggest plays in New York Yankees history

Biggest plays in New York Yankees history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

RCPPHOTO // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in New York Yankees history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in New York Yankees history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#10. October 13, 1960 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 9-7 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: PIT
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to RF (Line Drive to Short CF-RF); B. Richardson Scores; D. Long to 3B
– cWPA: 21.38%

#9. October 05, 1952 (WS Gm 5)
– Score: down 4-2 (5th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: LAD
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep RF); G. McDougald Scores; P. Rizzuto Scores
– cWPA: 21.47%

#8. November 04, 2001 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 1-1 (8th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: ARI
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run
– cWPA: 23.12%

#7. October 16, 1962 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 1-0 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: Out
– Play Description: *ENDED GAME*:Lineout: 2B
– cWPA: 24.13%

#6. November 01, 2001 (WS Gm 5)
– Score: down 2-0 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: ARI
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run; J. Posada Scores
– cWPA: 24.19%

#5. October 12, 1964 (WS Gm 5)
– Score: down 2-0 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: STL
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep CF-RF); M. Mantle Scores (Unearned run); T. Tresh Scores (Unearned run)
– cWPA: 24.29%

#4. October 05, 1941 (WS Gm 4)
– Score: down 4-3 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: LAD
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to RF (Fly Ball); T. Henrich Scores (Unearned run); J. DiMaggio Scores (Unearned run)
– cWPA: 25.08%

#3. October 09, 1958 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 2-2 (8th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: ATL
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to CF (Ground Ball); Y. Berra Scores
– cWPA: 26.27%

#2. October 15, 1923 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: down 4-3 (8th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to CF (Ground Ball thru SS-2B); H. Haines Scores; E. Johnson Scores; J. Dugan Scores (Advanced on throw) on E8 (throw to 3B)/No RBI (Unearned run); B. Meusel to 3B
– cWPA: 26.85%

#1. October 13, 1960 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 4-2 (6th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: PIT
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep RF Line); T. Kubek Scores; M. Mantle Scores
– cWPA: 34.32%

Topics:

NYC
LA

Biggest plays in Oakland Athletics history

Biggest plays in Oakland Athletics history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

dean bertoncelj // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in Oakland Athletics history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in Oakland Athletics history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#10. October 17, 1911 (WS Gm 3)
– Score: down 1-0 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Line Drive to Deep RF)
– cWPA: 13.13%

#9. October 14, 1973 (WS Gm 2)
– Score: down 6-5 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYM
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to LF; S. Bando Scores; R. Jackson to 2B
– cWPA: 13.24%

#8. October 07, 1972 (ALCS Gm 1)
– Score: down 2-1 (11th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: DET
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Single to RF (Ground Ball thru 2B-1B); M. Hegan Scores; G. Tenace Scores (Advanced on throw) on E9 (throw to 3B) (Unearned run)
– cWPA: 13.31%

#7. October 21, 1973 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: ahead 2-0 (3rd inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYM
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Deep CF-RF); J. Rudi Scores
– cWPA: 13.48%

#6. October 14, 1929 (WS Gm 5)
– Score: down 2-0 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: CHC
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep RF); M. Bishop Scores
– cWPA: 14.43%

#5. October 22, 1972 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 3-2 (8th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: CIN
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Popfly: LF (Short LF)
– cWPA: 16.71%

#4. October 22, 1972 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 1-1 (6th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: CIN
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to LF (Line Drive to LF Line); B. Campaneris Scores
– cWPA: 18.53%

#3. October 21, 1973 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 0-0 (3rd inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: NYM
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Deep RF); K. Holtzman Scores
– cWPA: 18.73%

#2. October 06, 1930 (WS Gm 5)
– Score: tied 0-0 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: STL
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Deep LF); M. Cochrane Scores
– cWPA: 19.50%

#1. October 19, 1972 (WS Gm 4)
– Score: down 2-1 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: CIN
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to CF (Fly Ball to CF-RF); A. Lewis Scores; G. Tenace to 3B
– cWPA: 19.98%

Topics:

LA
LA

Biggest plays in Los Angeles Angels history

Biggest plays in Los Angeles Angels history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

RCPPHOTO // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in Los Angeles Angels history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in Los Angeles Angels history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#6. October 26, 2002 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: down 5-3 (8th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run
– cWPA: 7.73%

#5. October 26, 2002 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: down 5-4 (8th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to LF (Fly Ball to Deep LF-CF); C. Figgins Scores; G. Anderson Scores (Unearned run)
– cWPA: 11.45%

#4. October 20, 2002 (WS Gm 2)
– Score: tied 9-9 (8th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (LF-CF); D. Eckstein Scores
– cWPA: 11.45%

#3. October 27, 2002 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 1-0 (2nd inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to CF (Fly Ball to Deep LF-CF); S. Spiezio Scores
– cWPA: 11.67%

#2. October 27, 2002 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 1-1 (3rd inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: Double to RF (Line Drive to RF Line); D. Eckstein Scores; D. Erstad Scores; T. Salmon Scores
– cWPA: 13.85%

#1. October 26, 2002 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: down 5-4 (8th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: SFG
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: Single to LF (Pop Fly to Short LF Line); C. Figgins to 3B; G. Anderson to 2B (Advanced on throw) on E7
– cWPA: 14.65%

Topics:

LA
LA

Biggest plays in Los Angeles Dodgers history

Biggest plays in Los Angeles Dodgers history
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026
By Stacker Feed
2 min read • Published March 20, 2026

Grindstone Media Group // Shutterstock

Biggest plays in Los Angeles Dodgers history

Major League Baseball history is built on moments — swings, pitches, and split-second plays that reshaped seasons and, in some cases, entire franchises. From walk-off home runs in winner-take-all games to clutch hits under October pressure, the biggest plays often came when the stakes were highest. Stacker identified the most impactful plays in Los Angeles Dodgers history using data from Stathead. Plays were ranked by their Championship Win Probability Added (cWPA), a metric that measures how much a single play changed a team’s odds of winning the World Series.

#10. October 05, 1953 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: down 3-1 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Deep RF); D. Snider Scores
– cWPA: 16.65%

#9. November 01, 2025 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 4-4 (9th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: TOR
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Groundout: 2B-C/Forceout at Hm (2B-1B); A. Barger to 3B; A. Kirk to 2B; D. Varsho to 1B
– cWPA: 17.47%

#8. October 04, 1955 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 2-0 (6th inning, 0 outs)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: Out
– Play Description: Double Play: Flyball: LF; G. McDougald out at 1B/LF-SS-1B
– cWPA: 17.90%

#7. October 09, 1956 (WS Gm 6)
– Score: tied 0-0 (10th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: 1B
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Single to LF (Line Drive to Deep LF); J. Gilliam Scores; D. Snider to 2B
– cWPA: 20.88%

#6. October 19, 1981 (NLCS Gm 5)
– Score: tied 1-1 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: WSH
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run
– cWPA: 21.18%

#5. October 25, 2024 (WS Gm 1)
– Score: down 3-2 (10th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: HR
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep RF); C. Taylor Scores; T. Edman Scores; M. Betts Scores
– cWPA: 22.88%

#4. October 15, 1988 (WS Gm 1)
– Score: down 4-3 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: OAK
– Event: HR
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Home Run (Line Drive to Deep RF); M. Davis Scores
– cWPA: 27.31%

#3. October 03, 1947 (WS Gm 4)
– Score: down 2-1 (9th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: NYY
– Event: 2B
– Play Description: *WALK-OFF*:Double to RF (Line Drive); A. Gionfriddo Scores; E. Miksis Scores
– cWPA: 30.01%

#2. November 01, 2025 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: tied 4-4 (11th inning, 2 outs)
– Opponent: TOR
– Event: HR
– Play Description: Home Run (Fly Ball to Deep LF)
– cWPA: 41.03%

#1. November 01, 2025 (WS Gm 7)
– Score: down 5-4 (11th inning, 1 out)
– Opponent: TOR
– Event: Out
– Play Description: *ENDED GAME*:Ground Ball Double Play: SS-1B (SS-2B)
– cWPA: 46.24%

Topics:

LA

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts
Featured Jobs
Kirkus Media
Editorial Intern
Kirkus Media
New York City, New York (US)

Gaia Inc
MEDIA COORDINATOR
Gaia Inc
Louisville, CO

Gaia Inc
Global Paid Media Specialist
Gaia Inc
Louisville, CO

Gaia Inc
Director of Media Strategy
Gaia Inc
Louisville, CO

Hearst Television
Account Executive
Hearst Television
Milwaukee, WI, United States

All Jobs »
PREMIUM MEMBER
MV

Martynas Valukonia

Washington, DC
2025 Years Experience
View Full Profile »
Join Mediabistro Membership Today

Stand out from the crowd with a premium profile

Mediabistro Logo Find your next media job or showcase your creative talent
  • Job Search
  • Hot Jobs
  • Membership
  • Newsletter
  • Career Advice
  • Media News
  • Hiring Tips
  • Creative Tools
  • About
Facebook YouTube Instagram LinkedIn
Copyright © 2026 Mediabistro
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy