Bottom Feeding

And here we are, talking about accountability again, which was not used with any thought to discretion today in New York Post's article about Spoofcard, a service that allows you to scramble your number for outgoing calls, making it easy to hack into people's messaging services, get their voicemails, and even change their messages.

Why is this relevant news?

Well, because Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan have had their phones hacked using Spoofcards, and since The Post has given you step-by-step instructions on how to use one of those "theoretically legal" (what does that even mean? Lawfully legal? Juridically legal? But not morally legal?) cards, soon you too can be using them for "for pranks, calling boyfriends or mothers under another number to fool them." Not The Post approves, in anyway, of course. They're just letting you know.

It's summer and there's not much going on in the city, but we can't help but notice that our anonymous tip box has been getting a lot of attention recently.

We've been editing this blog for a little over a month now, and although we are so grateful for your continued feedback and tips, we have to point out that the anonymous tip box should be used appropriately. There is a place for comments -- there are comment boxes below each and every article. By sending your comments to us directly, "anonymously," through the tip box, you take away the ability of our community to discuss your ideas and opinions. That kind of discussion is so important to blogs, and we want to encourage it. (Plus, you can still remain anonymous as a commenter, if you want.)

As a result (and because it's Friday and we wanted to have some fun) we have posted some of the comments that we have received over the past few days below, as well as the articles we think they were in response to. We want to hear your voice, we just want everyone to hear it, too. So continue to give us your feedback and comments, and we'll respond to you, too.

continued...

Travel + Leisure will launch its seventh international edition. The latest spin-off will debut in South Korea in September. So-Young Joo, previously managing editor of Asiana and We, will be the magazine's editor.

Ultra HD relaunched Full Frontal Fashion just in time for Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week. Everyone run for the hills. Or better yet, The Hills?

Readers are canceling their subscriptions to US Weekly because of its Sarah Palin cover. (Or not.)

We're not entirely sure how it's only Thursday today and not Friday — probably some evil plan concocted by NBC to fool the entire country in order to make more money off the Olympics. Anyway, it's August, and as much as we love gazing at Michael Phelps we need a break. To that end we bring you an entirely new sporting event, as exhibited by Gavin Miles McInnes, former Vice founder and currently one half of StreetCarnage.com. In our minds this is nothing less than an Olympian feat, and possibly should be considered as a future event. Synchronized pepper eating anyone?

Those silly Aussies and their precious privacy. According to The Australian, Oz media companies are bracing for the Australian Law Reform Commission to recommend new laws that would severely limit the nature of the reporting done on public figures.

The new law "could have a significant chilling effect on the reporting of the private lives of celebrities," communications law firm Gilbert + Tobin partner Peter Leonard told the paper.

As an example of the type of reporting that could no longer be done, The Australian cites the case of Wayne Carey, a well-known Aussie Rules football play who was accused of having a fling with an escort. So essentially, if we passed this law in the States, we'd never know about Eliot Spitzer. America, f*ck yeah.

Did you know that the term "dog days of summer" originated with the Greeks who at the beginning of the sultry weather would sacrifice a brown dog to appease Sirius, the Dog Star, who they assumed was the cause of the hot weather? The Greeks certainly had their fair share of monsters, which brings us to New York's own Montauk Monster who apparently has hit the big time! Not only was it featured on a variety of local newscasts last night but Monty made it all the way to CNN. Meaning among other things, we suppose, that Gawker is a reliable source, but the National Inquirer, not so much. Is this a country desperate for distraction, or what.

Anyway! Apparently a "scientist" was brought in who says "it can't be a raccoon (legs/arms not in proportion to body), or a dog (feet "don't match up" — ??) or a turtle (they don't have teeth)." Should FBNY readers have anything to add to this deepening mystery feel free to drop us a line.

We've sort of been ignoring the Montauk Monster up until now, mostly because between the water bug we found in the bathtub yesterday and seeing Jaws at far too young an age we've had our fill of scary water monster stories. However! Being that it's a slow Thursday in July, and there is very little else to tell you about (you know, notwithstanding the blow the court just dealt to Bush over whether White House aides can be subpoenaed, or, the fact that the Bush administration is trying to make birth control the equivalent of abortion under the eyes of the law) we bring you the Montauk Monster!

Gawker is calling him Monty, and he washed up on the beach earlier this week looking very much like something out of Where the Wild Things Are only scarier because he came out of the depths of the ocean. Add to that the fact that no one seems to know what it is! Fox News is speculating it might be a raccoon or a dog and a commenter at Gawker writes in to say the whole thing is a photoshop hoax, though Gawker isn't buying that argument. Some folks suspect it's merely part of a viral ad campaign, though for what we hesitate to ask. Here at FBNY we're all sticking with it being an animal experiment gone awry signifying that we are all destined for alien abduction on October 14, 2012. Or else it's a dog, though we'd rather it be a monster than a sad drowned doggie, truth be told. Who wants to go to the beach!