![]() |
||
|
Receive mediabistro.com's Daily GalleyCat Feed via email
Wednesday Oct 24, 2007
More in Book Reviewer Gaffes, Biblical Division
In Brown's defense, McClure (an editor at Albert Whitman, the book's publisher) points out that the timeline of Jesus' brith in the Gospel of Matthew is not as compressed as the version popularized in movies. The wise men showed up in Jerusalem and had their audience with Herod "about the time" of Jesus' birth, and Matthew 2:11 specifically states that "they entered the house where the child and his mother, Mary, were," the key words being "house" rather than "manger" and "child" rather than "baby." (This is why Herod ordered the death of every male infant under the age of two in Bethlehem; he only had an approximate sense of when the prophesied messiah was born.) "We've heard from a lot of booksellers and people who are glad to see a picture book that goes by the Biblical account," she says. "Seems a little strange for a PW reviewer to call a children's book 'revisionist' without stopping to consider that a story that's been told for 2,000 years might, you know, have a few variations." But, she assured me, they're not angry about the error in the review; "we just hope we can make it known that we weren't being revisionist!" Email This Post |
||