![]() |
||
|
Receive mediabistro.com's Daily GalleyCat Feed via email
Random House U.S.A is looking for a Marketing Assistant - WaterBrook Multnomah Publishing. See the next featured job.
Pearson Education is looking for a College Publishing Sales Representative. See the next featured job.
Cosimo Books is looking for a Freelancer - Book Production. See all other great jobs at our Job Board.
Wednesday Dec 20, 2006
The Regan Report: ADL Condemnation, Shearer on SiriusTo the surprise of no one, the Anti-Defamation League has condemned Judith Regan's alleged remarks about a "Jewish cabal" at HarperCollins. "If Ms. Regan did make the charge that a Jewish cabal was conspiring against her, she clearly stepped over the line by employing the age-old anti-Semitic canard that Jews conspire against non-Jews," ADL National Director Abraham H. Foxman said to AP's Hillel Italie yesterday afternoon. "She also gives credence to the conspiracy theory that Jews control the media. Whatever her dispute with HarperCollins, the Jewishness of her critics had absolutely no relevance to the matter at hand, which leads one to question why she resorted to raising the Jewish issue." Meanwhile, Ron's report of his stint on Regan's radio show last week brought Harry Shearer out of the woodwork to detail his account on the show the Thursday after Thanksgiving - when the OJ book deal cancellation was still fresh. "For the record," he notes, "there was no mention or suggestion of Jews or anti-Semitism in any of this half-hour-long conversation, even by her." (This matches up with Ron's experience; before the formal taping began, he heard Regan's interactions with the production staff over his headphones, and while her employees come under just as much verbal fire as is suggested in the stories you've heard, the prolonged criticism never once broached the Jewish question.) The most salient exchange in Shearer's taping came after Regan ranted about "people gunning for successful women" and not understanding why it had come about: "I think one reason people may have reacted so angrily and energetically against this project was because it was an opportunity to attack Rupert Murdoch." Email This Post |
||