Welcome to our new series, J-School Confidential, filed by media experts-in-the-making. Our rotating cast of emerging journos will take on that great media debate — to j-school or not to j-school — while chronicling their tales of learning the craft both in the academic setting and on the ground.

In this week’s edition, Hamilton junior Eric Kuhn explores the future of the college newspaper. He finds that while online sources for disseminating campus news are increasing opportunities for new journalists, there will always be a place for the ink and paper version.

COLLEGE, USA – From inside the bathroom stall, to the table of the cafeteria, a hard copy of a campus newspaper lies wide open. Like many things that don’t resemble the real world, on a college campus literally everyone reads their college newspaper. Yes, that old-fashioned ink and paper edition where your fingers get smudged by just flipping its pages.

College journalism and papers “have a captive audience with no competitors,” says Kelly McBride, the ethics group leader at Poynter Institute and an ad-hoc advisor to college newspapers around the country. “The local daily isn’t going to investigate failing security systems in the dorms or document the plague of sex abuse on college campuses.” But while most newspapers are struggling, are college papers in trouble? Probably not, according to McBride — “Sure the college newsroom is as relevant as ever. But the system for delivering the news should be changing.” And by “changing” she means going online.

Of course, going online opens a can of worms: blogs, freelancing, online publications, heck, really anything (as a senior in high school I started co-editing an international photography magazine). Why would a student want to write for their college newspaper, when there is a world of other things to write for and about?

Take, for example, The Campus Word, a Web site that, according to co-founder Chase Gabarino, “provides college journalists and students a platform to freely voice their opinions on anything to do with college life.” Expect two things if you write for the Campus Word (unlike many college newspapers): a paycheck and a chance to be uncensored.

“There [is] an issue with freedom of press at colleges and universities across the country,” Gabarino says. “We saw this issue in the Hosty v. Carter case in 2005. If something truly offends you, you can comment on the item voicing your displeasure. That is the beauty of the Internet, not just freedom of speech.”

Whether it be via the Internet or simply on (literally) the editorial page of the paper, opinions are what college students love to read. Of course, a paper’s Web site can help bring out the best of both worlds. “The editorial section is frequently the most-read section of a college newspaper and the online edition enables readers to respond, fostering a dialogue around issues that matter most on campus,” says College Media Network director Paul Pennelli.

But David A. Klatell, Vice Dean and Professor of Professional Practice at Columbia’s School of Journalism recommends that while “there is no single ‘right’ way to do journalism…students [should] act as general assignment reporters, covering a wide range of stories and subjecting their work to editing, rather than the tendency to write opinion columns, blogs, or other outlets for personal opinions.”

Herein lies the key to a campus paper: community. “Working on a college newspaper is to learn how to work with people and work in a creative environment,” says Ben French, the former editor-in-chief of the Indiana Daily Student (University of Indiana Bloomington) and now the general manager of UWire.com, the leading aggregator and distributor of student-generated content. “The creative process is tricky, but a college paper is a good way to cut your teeth.” French believes that the Internet offers a new level of collaboration because everyone is navigating new waters on the same boat.

Campus papers do offer benefits that keeping a blog does not. “The great thing about writing for your college paper is that you should get some editing,” McBride says. But she warns that sometimes fledgling journalists receive bad advice. At any campus news organization, bad editors, colleagues, or just overall bad papers can exist. “Those realities are present at many college papers.”

“College Paper 2.0” is now easier then ever. In 1999 everyone in “the real world” become a blogger with the launch of Blogger.com. In that same year, three Emerson College alumni teamed up to create a product allowing college papers to easily place their content online. College Publisher, Inc. was created and quickly spread. The company was soon bought by Y2M: Youth Media and Marketing Networks, which mtvU (part of MTV Networks) acquired in 2006. College Publisher, according to their Web site, “soon became one of the most influential organizations in the world of college media,” covering over 500 diverse schools such as Harvard University, Dartmouth College, Boston College, the University of Texas, Arizona State University, and Stanford University.

College Publisher allows journalists to be read outside his or her campus. It costs nothing for a paper to have its content on College Publisher — advertisements support the site — the often difficult campus-wide search for a tech-whiz is eliminated, and fellow newspapers can band together for services ranging from free AP content to a private-label broadband player. The site gives aspiring journalists an invaluable opportunity to play with “new media.”

Pennelli, who oversees the College Publisher software, says that with its creation, “The biggest change is we’ve eliminated a whole set of factors college newspapers used to have to worry about when establishing or maintaining an online presence. Recent research shows that approximately 75 percent of college students regularly read their college newspapers — at least twice the rate with which they read national newspapers.” He believes that the near future will still include print papers on campuses and the content will not solely live online.

Of course, campus papers will continue to grow on the Internet. However, there is something about the college culture that allows the actual paper (finger smudges and all) to flourish. It is a safe bet that everyone who lives in the campus bubble will take some time out of their busy day to grab the college paper on the way to the bathroom or while sitting down in the dining hall.

In the latest edition of J-School Confidential, we trade higher learning for high school and enter the world of MTV’s upcoming reality show The Paper, debuting in early ’08. The show follows editors of The Circuit, the high school paper of Cypress Bay High School in Weston, Florida, as they struggle to produce a 32-page color issue every month, while balancing school work, family, and the typical drama of teenage life. Our writer spoke with the paper’s faculty adviser and the producer of the show about the insanity of the newsroom, what makes a good journalist, and the death threats one op-ed writer received.

Writers’ deadlines had come and gone, editors had edited, the layout team had added their final touches, and all that remained was for the newspaper’s computer file to be converted into a PDF — the only way it could be sent off to the printer. Where was the one guy who knew how to do this particular task? At “High School Musical on Ice,” of course.

This will be one of the plots to appear on MTV’s newest reality show, The Paper, a series about a high school newspaper, set for an eight-episode run in the first quarter of 2008.

The Circuit, operated and managed by 60 students and faculty adviser Rhonda Weiss, reports on Cypress Bay High School in Weston, Florida. The paper comes out seven times a year, skipping January because of winter break.

MTV’s relationship with the paper started when one of Mrs. Weiss’s student’s friend’s mothers (how most things seem to happen in this business) saw a post for auditions. The mother told the student, knowing he was on the newspaper staff. The editors prepared a video, and before they knew it, MTV came down to Florida to shoot the pilot.

“We are a very local, boisterous group,” says Weiss, an English and journalism teacher who has been the paper’s adviser for six years. “Our high school is the largest in the country and our staff is very large. I can’t compare us to other schools’ [newspapers], but we probably looked a little insane when they saw what was going on in the room.”

The pilot focuses on picking the editorial positions for the following year and the drama that goes along with it. Since Cypress Bay High is large and competitive, these students see an editor title, in part, as a means to an end for getting into a great college. The paper’s first editor-in-chief went to Cornell; last year’s editor is attending George Washington University with aspirations of becoming a political speechwriter.

A good high school journalist is “someone who is independent, takes initiative, isn’t afraid to talk to people and ask tough questions — so they need a bit of an outgoing personality — and is a good writer (the most important part),” says Weiss, who was the editor-in-chief of her high school newspaper.

Six thousand color copies of the 32-page paper are printed each month, so the writers and editors have to be rock stars. “My students have done stories where they interviewed school board members, county members, and really gone up the ranks,” Weiss says. And while the school pays Weiss’ salary and supplements the paper, covering costs that advertisements do not pay for, The Circuit has editorial freedom.

But, like any rock band, problems can arise and MTV will have their cameras rolling. Two of the editors are dating. The ups and downs of that relationship at any given time bleeds into their newspaper life. The show’s executive producer, Marshall Eisen, wants to focus on the conflict between work and life outside the paper. “They are so committed to the paper that much of their personal lives are shaped by what they do on it,” he said in a recent telephone interview. “It is such a time commitment it effects everything else they do in their lives.”

Eisen worked on his junior-high newspaper, but admits that it certainly pales in comparison to The Circuit‘s operation. One kid — yes, they are still kids — wrote such a provocative editorial on immigration that he received death threats. However, between acting like Lou Dobbs and undergoing the demands for excellence, each staff member has to study for tests, apply to colleges, and decide if time allows involvement in other school activities.

MTV’s executives have high hopes that the show will break new ground in the crowded high school reality show market. “With The Paper we dive into a rarely seen side of High School life — showcasing the dynamic and surprisingly intense life of students working on their high school newspaper,” Dave Sirulnick, executive vice president of MTV News and Docs, wrote in a statement. Newspapers are “a subset entirely ignored in teen movies and TV,” Weiss says. “When you think of teen movies or teen cliques, you think of the band kids, the athletes, the cheerleaders, whatever, but the newspaper kids are a group like any other, but are different from any other. [They aren’t] a stereotype of what you see in teen movies.”

The Paper will have elements of typical high school based entertainment coupled with real life (read: adult) reality. What Eisen found most surprising during the filming of the pilot was the amount of office politics. “It is really no different than any other high power competitive work place in how they manage and deal with each other and compete and support,” he said. “They are all just crammed into this one big room, so all of it just played out in front of your eyes.”

Neither Weiss nor her students have seen the pilot or any final product. “They are keeping us in the dark about it, which is a little nerve-racking,” she admits. “I am excited, but a little nervous to see how we are really presented. From my point of view, I am hoping it shines a spotlight on high school journalism and that journalism is a noble pursuit.”

Of course, how viewers will react is still up in the air. Weiss thinks MTV made “an incredibly brilliant decision,” although as any good journalist adviser would teach, she adds, “but, I am biased.”

The best advice Weiss gives to her students is: “Separate yourself from the story. It’s about what other people are doing. It’s not all about you being mad the lunch line is too long.” She instructs the budding journalists to remember, “As the journalist, you are not the story.” That advice seems ironic, now that the cameras are turned on The Circuit‘s staff.

Even more than death, people dread public speaking. All of those faces staring up at you, judging you, counting the minutes until you step down from the podium. Many writers shy away from public appearances because they find it easier to hide behind their computer and the safety of the written word than to face a sea of strangers and worry about whether the person in the back row can hear them or if someone will ask a question that puts them on the spot.

So what happens when you get an invitation to speak at a journalism conference? Or when someone asks you to teach a creative writing course? Or worse, when the success of your new book hinges on a series of readings at Barnes and Nobles or television interviews?

Whether you’re speaking on a panel, teaching a class, or getting ready for your close-up, here are some practical tips to help you polish your public speaking skills.

Familiarize yourself with the material in advance

If you’re giving a speech or reading excerpts from your new book, the last thing you want to do is bury yourself in the text. “People who spend their whole talks looking down at a piece of paper rather than up at their audience really lose an opportunity for connection with that audience,” says Boston writer and editor Adam Pachter. A veteran of the bookstore circuit, Pachter has promoted his anthologies Fenway Fiction and Further Fenway Fiction at numerous readings. He suggests that speakers “try to commit key lines or points to memory if it’ll make you less nervous. I try to [choose] a passage that I particularly enjoy [because] if I don’t like what I’m reading, how can the audience?”

For panel, speeches, or TV appearances, you’ll also want to familiarize yourself with the format so you’ll be prepared and feel at ease. DC-area freelance writer and speaker Kristen King says she tries to “understand exactly what is expected of me as far as what I’m going to be talking about and for how long, whether there will be audience discussion or just a lecture, how many people will be there … and any other details I can gather.” Seeing the space or even attending another event there beforehand will also help calm nerves.

Choose your outfit carefully

When LA food blogger Pat Saperstein appeared on The Food Network’s Throwdown with Bobby Flay, she wore a new shirt purchased specifically for her TV appearance. Unfortunately, Sapterstein says the shirt “ended up sliding around on my shoulders. Next time I’ll make like Rachel Ray and go with the solid-colored v-neck sweater.”

Giulia Rozzi, who teaches a writing class called “Page to Stage” and produces a series of readings called Mortified in Boston and New York, points out another key consideration: “If your nerves act up, you may start to sweat, and wearing a top that shows those sweat marks will just make you more nervous.” Dark colors camouflage sweat better than lighter ones, but they can also wash out fair-skinned people, especially on camera.

Most of all, choose clothes that are flattering but still comfortable and appropriate to the situation. When in doubt, “talk to the organizers and ask them what the atmosphere will be like,” says Erik Sherman, a freelance journalist and writing instructor outside of Boston.

Use your nerves to your advantage

Being nervous is natural, especially if it’s your first appearance, but it’s not necessarily bad. “[Being] a little on edge means you’ll be more present to what you’re saying, and that will help bring in the people there,” says Sherman. People empathize with those who show a little vulnerability, because they seem human.

Even though you’re nervous, you can still appear confident and in control. Keren Taylor, executive director of Write Girl, a LA nonprofit that teaches writing and self-expression, suggests you “use the nervous energy you have to energize you. Embrace the nervousness instead of fighting it and trying to make it go away.”

Kimberly Haines, a Bay Area teacher-turned-freelance writer, has another idea for dealing with stage fright: “If the crowd spooks you, you need to focus on something else. Plant a friendly face at the back of the room … If you put at least one of [your friends] in the back, you’ll look as if you’re including the whole crowd, even if you’re only talking to your best friend. Don’t know anyone at the reading? Pick a spot in the back of the room that you can focus on when you look up and imagine someone who supports you is standing there.”

Know your conversation style

According to Sherman, “don’t be perfect; be yourself. I’ve seen too many people giving talks and lectures … [become] mechanical clones when they speak. They may seem ‘polished,’ but they don’t strike me as lively or particularly engaging.”

If you’re serious, be serious. If you were once the class clown, then try opening with a joke. “I tend to use humor to get my points across and it makes (or at least I hope it makes) my talks or classes more entertaining while still being educational,” says Rozzi.

But if you’re not funny in real life, then don’t try to imitate a stand-up comic, because the humor could fall flat. “Every time I try to open with an actual joke, no one laughs, so I’ve given up on that,” King admits. Instead, she’s found that “leading with an anecdote tends to put people at ease, and the more embarrassing or horrific, the better.” Again, people like to see the human side of the author or speaker.

Anticipate potential questions

If you’re doing a TV interview or a live question and answer session for a panel or course, you should brainstorm what questions people might ask so you’re not caught off guard. “You shouldn’t try to wing it or assume that on the spur of the moment, you’ll come up with the right thing to say … There’s no guarantee you will come up with the right thing to say unless you’ve thought about it beforehand,” Pachter says. To prep for public appearances, Saperstein says, “I pre-interview myself in the car, and prepare a list of talking points.”

Of course, sometimes the crowd needs a little nudge before they’ll start asking questions. “Maybe have a few topics in mind to get a discussion going in case you need to liven up the room,” says Rozzi. “Another back-up plan is to have a game prepared or an exercise to do based on the topic of the talk or class.”

Forget mistakes

It can happen to anyone: you lose your train of thought, your microphone doesn’t work, or you drop your index cards on your way up to the podium. Often these mishaps are a bigger deal to you than they are to your audience. “Every now and then, my nerves will get the better of me and I’ll have some mortifying slip of the tongue,” King says. “I’ve learned to laugh it off and just keep going. If you just acknowledge the slip-up and move on, people forget about it quickly.”

Keep it short

Especially at a bookstore, where people may stop in for a few minutes to check out a new author and then continue browsing the shelves, audiences will get antsy if you go on for too long. “People’s attention spans are short today, so don’t talk or teach or read for more than 20 minutes or so without giving them a break or a chance to participate in some way,” Haines says. Pachter agrees: “[It’s] far better to be too short than too long, and you always want to leave your audience with an incentive to buy the book and get ‘the rest of the story.'”

Susan Johnston is a freelance writer and blogger in Boston, MA.

Few old media writers have survived the Internet earthquake as well as Jeff Jarvis. His print experience alone could fill multiple mediabistro.com features: he worked as an editor and reporter at the Chicago Tribune, editor and associate publisher at the New York Daily News, a TV critic at People and TV Guide, and he founded Entertainment Weekly. As an entire generation of print journalists watches their old expectations and institutions crumble, Jarvis is leading a new media revolution.

Since 2001, he’s blogged at his popular Web site, BuzzMachine.com, speculating about the future of journalism with the help of an active community of readers. In addition, he’s consulted with scores of companies about adapting to new media, including Advance Publications (owners of Conde Nast and Newhouse Newspapers) and The New York Times Company. He also consults with the next generation of journalists, leading the interactive journalism department at City University of New York’s graduate school.

This month, Collins Business released his new book, What Would Google Do? (WWGD). The book sums up years of new media theory and practice, showing how Google’s innovative business model can help companies survive the transition to a digital world. He analyzes the Internet’s implications for journalism, publishing, government, and many other fields. The book release has adapted many of Jarvis’ “Google-y” innovations — selling a $9.99 video book version, excerpting sections on his blog, and allowing readers to browse the text on the HarperCollins Web site.

Name: Jeff Jarvis
Position: Blogger, BuzzMachine.com; professor, CUNY Graduate School of Journalism; columnist, the Guardian
Resume: Creator of Entertainment Weekly; president, Advance.net; TV critic, TV Guide and People; Sunday editor and associate publisher, New York Daily News; columnist, San Francisco Examiner
Birthdate: 1954
Hometown: Chicago
Education: Journalism degree from Northwestern
Marital status: Married to Tammy
First section of the Sunday Times: “None. Read it online.”
Favorite TV show: Weeds
Last book read: The Numerati by Steve Baker

How did you make the jump from blog to book? How do you turn your timely short pieces into a longer argument?

The great thing about having a blog is you can explore ideas with people who are very generous about making that idea better. I had blogged about What Would Google Do? (WWGD) in terms of newspapers, and one day I woke up and knew there was a book there.

My agent is Kate Lee at IGM. She was one of the first agents to see talent in blogs, if not the first. I respected her work. I had a couple of book ideas that were kind of sucky, but she brought me in to talk. Later, I sat down and started outlining ideas. I realized as I put ideas down that this notion of WWGD would be a better umbrella. Under that, I created this construct: I didn’t want to tell Google’s story from Google’s perspective — I wanted to distill the reasons for its success.

In your book, you explain that “middlemen are dead.” How has this philosophy influenced your career as a book author? You chose to follow the traditional publishing model for this book, but last year saw massive problems at big publishing houses. How much longer do you think new writers can trust this model?

As long as the traditional model works, I’ll choose it. In publishing, they add value. A middleman isn’t a middleman if they truly add value. My agent clearly added value in the current marketplace. She gave me great advice on developing the book and formulating the idea. We got to the publishing house, and I learned a lot about the middleman’s value there — my editor improved the book immensely. I wanted the public to be involved in the ideas, pushing me in peer review. My editor is Ben Loehnen, a brilliant line editor. They are promoting relationships with booksellers, which still exist, by god.

In some ways, I say hyperbolically that middlemen are dead, but there are some ways that they are alive more than ever. We have so much content, we can’t find the content we want. Clay Shirky calls it “filter failure.” The solution is to help curate or aggregate the content — that’s a value added. The opportunity is saying, ‘How can I help?’

What’s your advice for the hundreds of laid-off journalists in workforce?

Part of the point I make is that we had a responsibility, a stewardship, over journalism. We as journalists should have seen what was coming. We should have adapted our skills. If we don’t accept responsibility for the past, then we can’t take control in the future. Even people who are still employed today have responsibilities to learn and innovate and change.

There’s not a second to waste. They should all be learning the skills of this new world. They are easy to learn. I’ve accused print people of acting like priesthood, but the online folks did the same thing. These tools are easy and fun to teach, we should be teaching them generously. Get a Flip camera, start doing videos. Enter into conversations, learn about it. Then look for opportunities.

There are plenty of voids in journalism that are opening up. You could follow Debra Galant’s example at BaristaNet.com: She was former columnist at The New York Times, and created a local blog. She started her own, she’s created real value there. She employs people, she’s profitable, and last I heard, she had 10,000 visitors a day. She’s bringing journalism and fun and new organization to Montclair. Is it possible in every town? Will it replace your old salary and benefits? No guarantees.

Find something that’s not being covered. You can cover an industry, a special interest, or a disease. We journalists look for problems, but we should look for opportunities instead. From my blog work, I got a book deal, consulting, [and] teaching work out of it. Don’t count solely the blog income.

Finally, you have to learn the business side, or find somebody else who knows the business. We are unaccustomed to that, but we need to learn it. Be willing to look at new models and platforms. Maybe you’ll create iPhone apps. There are all sorts of opportunities, but they are all risky. Do it while you have the luxury of failing.

You recently criticized David Carr’s idea for a news iTunes. How does the wisdom of Google apply to this particular situation?

What Carr was going after was the idea that the public is not paying for journalism anymore. That’s naive about the economics of media and newspapers. The public never paid for journalism — advertisers did.

To go to the Google model, it is scarcity versus abundance. It was an economy based on scarcity: ‘I own the press and you don’t — nah nah nah.’ The Internet clearly blows that apart. Companies in the old model can’t reproduce that model. Google creates abundance. The more content there is, the more Google can do. Carr’s model wants to recreate the model of scarcity. But the problem with that is that it’s impossible to compete with free. TimesSelect proved it: When they got rid of it, traffic went up 40 percent, by one report.

Rather than try to recreate scarcity, you have to find abundance. You don’t control it anymore. That’s what led to the book, if you ask What Would Google Do? — how can I turn this around? About.com is a great example. They got 80 percent of their traffic and half their revenue from Google. Google created a spot for them to exist, they helped it succeed — that’s how Google succeeds.

What can the Obama administration learn from Google? What’s your advice for this new political team as they face our country’s daunting problems?

I think to a greater extent, they have already adapted these ideas. By hiring Chris Hughes, the co-founder of Facebook, for the campaign, they used social media brilliantly. Nicolas Sarkozy did all sorts of interesting things for video before he was elected, but I don’t think he does it anymore. I hope that’s not the case with the Obama administration. Of course, bureaucrats in Washington can derail any good attempts.

What’s possible now is that we can have a more collaborative, transparent, and open government. Transparency yields openness, brings people into the process. My first hope is government becomes more transparent.

I think we should abolish the Freedom of Information Act. The government should ask our permission to keep things from us. What if the default was openness? Everything we do is digital, so why not share it?

Do not assume that everything the government does is dastardly. The discussion always defaults to the negative. If people were able to be involved, to share and improve ideas and see that their ideas would pay off, it could change things. It’s possible to imagine a world where smart citizens help the government work smarter.

Your book has plenty of advice for how old media companies can learn from Google. What can new media companies — Nick Denton’s Gawker empire or mediabistro.com’s network — learn from your book, especially in this recession?

They have learned already. Nick is the guy who first introduced me to blogs. I chased him to invest in his last company, and he said ‘I’ve got to show you this thing’ — a blog. I didn’t see it. Nick is very cagey and brilliant; I don’t believe his poor mouthing [pleading poverty as a defense or excuse] for a minute. He’s making tough decisions.

These new companies are different. I think if mediabistro.com started 20 years ago, it would have been a newsletter, but now, it’s a network. It has jobs, education, and it’s very Google-y in its thinking.

However, in my book, I lambaste Yahoo for being the last old media company. You become old really fast. Mostly, I think old companies are still looking at the old world with an old worldview.

In your book, you discuss your evolving interaction with the computer company Dell. Could you explain how that experience shaped your work as a blogger?

I bought a computer and it sucked, and after becoming highly frustrated, I wrote a blog post with a headline “Dell Sucks.” I was not influential about computers, but my message rang true for too many readers, and it caused my post to rise up on Google and have an influence on Dell’s image.

After one year, they had technicians contact bloggers who complained. And then, Dell started blogging with Lionel Menchaca. He was brilliant at bringing a real human voice to the company. In the same way, Robert Scoble changed Microsoft’s image almost single-handedly with his company blog.

Once people see they can have an affect on a company, that influences the company’s image. It showed a change in the culture of the company. Starbucks adapted Dell’s ideas with MyStarbucksIdea.com. On the site, you can see what ideas take on critical mass, [and] which ones whither away. Now the stupid ideas die in public.

I was fascinated by these suggestions. People said: “My card should have my order and my money on it” and “I want to send my order by my iPhone.” Everybody was complaining about the Starbucks line, without ever complaining about the line.

Every time Google puts out a product, they say it’s beta — they say, ‘This isn’t done yet; we know it, tell us what it needs to be. Help us and we listen.’

In a more contemporary example, how do you feel about the online reporters who kept chasing stories about Steve Jobs’ health — is this fair news for new media journalists?

We’re a lot more public now. Young people are more transparent, but there is still a line of privacy. Generally that line is seen as health. I revealed on my blog my heart condition that I got out of Sept. 11. But I don’t run a major company. Nobody really suffered from me saying that. Maybe there was an employer who didn’t end up hiring me.

There are limits to public-ness, and I don’t know where I come down on Jobs. The company is so singularly about his vision — it brings the argument that everything should be public. The judgment should be this: Is he doing a good job running the company? That’s the hope, that they instill Jobs’ spirit in the company. It’s his job to instill the reasons why Apple succeeds in the rest of the company. That’s the job of every CEO.

I have to hope that he’s so smart that he realized that. I’m of two minds: Transparency is good, but I also understand the limits of public-ness.

You are the director of the new media program at CUNY. What does your program teach that young journalists need right now? How are you adapting your Google University techniques at this school? What are the other schools missing, in your opinion?
WWGD came from me trying to get the students to think this way. A lot of the students are more net-native than me. I teach them to trust themselves, not to default to our traditional ways. Journalism, like every single industry, must adapt.

The first thing we teach is change. They all learn the tools of the Internet and all media — they have to. Every student makes video with small and large cameras. They report with phones, blogs, and wikis throughout the whole time they are there. I also teach the impact of that technology — RSS and search engine optimization so they understand how their stories are found.

Students should be able to make video from scratch; everybody learns Final Cut as our primary tool. They all learn blogs. The program is called interactive journalism. It’s hard to teach interactivity without a public to interact with. They have to find a community and try to add journalism to it.

We were not taught the business of journalism. That made us bad stewards of journalism. We have an entrepreneurial journalism class where we can give some students seed money for new ventures. Journalists have to think, ‘How do I take advantage of that?’

You wrote, “Do what you do best, and link to the rest.” American Media Inc., the publisher of Star, The National Enquirer, Shape and Men’s Fitness is struggling right now. What will happen to the link quality of the gossip sphere if they disappear? In general, how will magazines closing affect the link economy?

I think that TMZ does plenty of original stuff, Gawker, Perez Hilton, too — there are lots of new players. Perhaps Star should have seen ways to work with them — aggregate with them, sell ads there — instead, like all old media, they just stayed there.

In general, I believe there is a market — whether we are talking about gossip or serious journalism — and I have hope that it will work out. Look what happened with TechCrunch, it has a huge amount of journalism, beating tech sections of newspapers. mediabistro.com covers media more than could ever fit in the pages of The New York Times. If big media leaves, there will be a vacuum — but it’s an opportunity to start something.

Earlier this year, you wrote: “So maybe the Times should buy the Huffington Post — or vice versa — and they can start to learn from each other now. Naw, that’s going too far.” Can you elaborate on that dramatic statement? How can the two economic models ever be reconciled?

What can you learn from the Huffington Post? How to give a people a voice. The Guardian looked at the Huffington Post and said, “Shit, we should have done that.” So they created Comment Is Free.

The Guardian has already adopted the Huffington Post model as part of their model. They can link to the news they already have. Part of the problem here is we set our standard at perfection. It’s better to be like Google doing beta tests — it’s a confession of imperfection so others can fill it in. That’s not the way we are trained as journalists.

Jason Boog is editor of GalleyCat.

Thirty-six years after covering his first presidential campaign, native Texan Bob Schieffer is back in the saddle once again. The 2008 election — what he calls “the most exciting one of all” — is heating up, and Schieffer is front and center as CBS News covers the action.

He not only will help lead his network’s reporting on the Democratic and Republican National Conventions, but feels “truly honored” to have been selected by the Commission on Presidential Debates to moderate the third John McCain vs. Barack Obama matchup on October 15.

It’ll be Schieffer’s second time as a presidential debate moderator, having presided over the third Bush vs. Kerry showdown four years ago. “What is so good this time is that the format is designed to produce real debates,” Schieffer explains. “The program will be divided into eight 10-minute segments.

“I’ll be moderating the debate on foreign policy and I will open each segment with a question on some specific topic, and then it will be my job to get them to respond directly to the question and to each other. If they don’t ask pertinent follow ups, I will encourage them to do so. It should really be interesting and informative.”

At 71, Schieffer has abandoned his once-declared intention to retire after the 2009 inauguration. Instead, he recently signed a long-term contract to stay at CBS News, but says he’ll likely step down from the specific role of hosting Face the Nation in the near future. “There’s no fixed date,” he says. “That may be sometime next year, or it may be sometime the year after that.”

Schieffer says he’ll “always have an office at CBS”. And what an office it is, having once been occupied by one of ‘Murrow’s Boys’, legendary newsman Eric Sevareid. “He was really my hero,” says Schieffer. “He was the one I kind of most wanted to be like… I still think of it as his office – I don’t think of it as my office. I feel very honored to be able to sit in the same room where he sat.”

Name: Bob Schieffer
Position: CBS News’ chief Washington correspondent and moderator of Face the Nation
Resume: Schieffer has been with CBS News since 1969. He was named chief Washington correspondent in 1982 and moderator of Face the Nation in 1991. He has worked a variety of beats for the network: the Pentagon (1970-74), White House (1974-79), State Department (1982-85), and Capitol Hill (1989-2003). Schieffer anchored the CBS Evening News Sunday Edition from 1973-76, and the CBS Evening News Saturday Edition from 1976-96. He also served as CBS Morning News anchor (1979-80) and CBS Evening News anchor from March 2005 to August 2006. Prior to joining CBS, Schieffer worked for local stations WTTG-TV (Washington, DC) and WBAP-TV (Dallas, Texas). He started his career while still in college, reporting for Ft. Worth radio station KXOL. After serving in the United States Air Force, Schieffer worked as a reporter for the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram before starting his television career. He is also the author of four books: Acting President (1989), This Just In, What I Couldn’t Tell You On TV (2003), Face The Nation (2004), and Bob Schieffer’s America (slated for release next month).
Birthdate: February 25, 1937
Hometown: Ft. Worth, Texas
Education: B.A. in Journalism and English, Texas Christian University, 1959 (In 2005, TCU honored Schieffer by renaming its journalism department the Schieffer School of Journalism.)
Marital status: Married to wife Patricia since 1967; has two daughters and three granddaughters.
First section of Sunday Times: I read the first sections of the Times and the Post, then I go to the op-eds and the editorials. And I check the editorial cartoons in the Post!
Favorite television show: Mystery! on PBS on Sunday nights. And, I love baseball — I watch baseball whenever it’s on.
Guilty pleasure: I hate to say this, but my guilty pleasure is politics [laughing]! I love politics and love covering politics, and it’s my guilty and not-guilty pleasure, I suppose.
Last book read: A Splendid Exchange: How Trade Shaped the World by William J. Bernstein. It is about the history of trade, which is kind of a wonky book to be reading, but it is a wonderful book. And the book I read before that was A World Without End by Ken Follett. I also re-read [Follett’s] Pillars of the Earth — these are both novels, but they’re about medieval England and the time of building the great cathedrals, and the Black Plague and all that. They’re just wonderful books — they’re both about 1,000 pages long, so I spent a good part of the summer on those.

You’ve been covering presidential politics for many years. How does covering the 2008 race compare to elections past?
This is without question maybe the most exciting one of all.
I actually went to my first convention in 1968, which was the Democratic convention in Chicago. Now, that one really stands out in family history. My wife and I thought we were not going to have children, and we had taken steps to adopt a child, just very preliminary steps. And exactly nine months to the day after the 1968 convention, our daughter Susan was born. Susan was in high school when she sort of figured out the numbers… and she said one day to her mother, “I guess it wasn’t all fighting out in the streets [at the convention], huh, Mom?”

So the 1968 convention will always be the one that stands out. But what is kind of interesting is that when we came back for the convention in 1996 in Chicago — the first time the Democrats had gone back [to Chicago] since ’68 — my daughter Susan… was a grown woman and came out there with us, and met the guy that she married. She had known him in grad school, but they had sort of been friends and reconnected in Chicago in 1996 and got married. So Chicago conventions are really a big thing in our family history!

There’s been a lot of buzz about whether the media is ‘in the tank’ for Barack Obama. How do you think the press has handled the Obama/McCain coverage?
You know, I’ve been accused of being ‘in the tank’ for so many different politicians that I think that’s just part of the game we go through here. You always find that the candidate who is running behind thinks the press is against him or her. It’s just sort of the way of the world. So I try to take it all in stride, I try to be very careful, and play it down the middle as much as I can. But no reporter who’s out there doing his job is not going to be accused at some point of being biased toward the other candidate — that’s just the way it is.

As you well know, the political conventions of today hardly provide the drama of conventions past. Do you believe conventions are, nonetheless, still worth covering?
They’re worth covering because any time you get that many politicians together in one place, at one time, you need to be there to find out what they’re doing, and what they’re talking about, and what they’re agreeing and disagreeing about, and what they’re cooking up. It is very, very important.

The truth of the matter is that these conventions now are more infomercials than they are the conventions that we used to know. I compare them kind of to an auto show, where the automakers roll out the new models. You know, the trade press comes along, kicks the tires, writes an evaluation of the new models, and there you are.

It’s the same way now with these conventions: you come, you get to hear the nominees, and you sort of put them under the spotlight, and that’s that. They are not nominating conventions, which is what they used to be. So they’re still important, but they’re just a totally different thing than what conventions used to be.

With cable and the Web providing extensive convention coverage, how much time do you think networks like CBS should devote to coverage — are the current programming plans appropriate, or would you like to see a more extensive commitment?
I think it’s about right. I think we’re giving it the coverage it deserves. I think what we have to be in a position to do is sort of summarize at one place, at one time, what we think are the most important developments. I think we’re prepared, if someone actually commits news, we’re prepared to expand our coverage. But right now, I think we’re giving it about what it needs.

How do you describe your behind-the-scenes role at CBS with regard to political coverage? As chief Washington correspondent and Face the Nation moderator, what are your day-to-day responsibilities and what influence do you have on the nature of CBS News’ coverage?
Basically what I do — my main job — is to prepare for Face the Nation and to try to get the key newsmakers on [the show] every Sunday. We start planning the next Sunday’s program on Sunday morning — that’s the first thing we do after we get off the air on Sundays. Executive producer Carin Pratt and I get together and start talking about what’s ahead.

My job is to just sort of stay up on what’s going on and make sure I have a good feel for what’s happening and what we expect to happen that week. I just sort of try to keep [up to speed], talk to sources, talk to colleagues, and get ready for Face the Nation.

Now, the second thing that I do is try to provide analysis of news events whenever the morning news or evening news ask me to do that. For example, I started my day this morning on the morning news — I did an analysis of the new polls that are out. So it’s just to try to stay [up to speed] and in contact with the people making the news. I spend a lot of time on the phone, a lot of time reading the paper, reading the blogs, and reading the wires.

In January of this year you announced you’d be retiring after the 2009 inauguration, but you later changed your mind and signed what’s been described as a long-term contract to stay on at CBS News. When [CBS News president] Sean McManus asked you to stay, why did you reverse course? And what does ‘long-term’ mean — do you have plans to retire at some point?
No, [not] at this point. Sean just asked me to stay, and he wanted me to be here for the transition, when someone else comes along to do Face the Nation. Basically, what I’m going to do is stay on board until we get a new person to do that — and that’ll be probably over the next couple of years. I mean, I’m 71, and I really am trying to dial back.

The reason I decided not to retire is because [McManus] asked me not to. And it was no more complicated than that. He said, “I’d really like for you to be around for a while, so we can make a good transition on Face the Nation.” So that’s why I did that. My brother says that he thinks that I’ve taken Roger Clemens as my role model — I announce my retirement, then I un-announce it, then I announce it again!

But right now I’m not planning to retire for a while. And as far as the contract, once we have a new person to do Face the Nation, then I will just be here to sort of provide analysis, when called upon, to be available for major events. I’ll always have an office at CBS, and this’ll always be the place that I will be. That part of it is just sort of indefinite. Basically what that means is that I’m never going to work any place else. When I finally hang it up for good, it will be at CBS, it won’t be someplace else. I’ve sort of taken Tom Brokaw as my model for the golden years!

With the death of your friend and colleague Tim Russert in June, the Sunday morning news scene obviously has been altered dramatically. With a few months having gone by now, how have things changed so far?
The competition is just as fierce as it always was. And like Tom Brokaw, Tim and I really became close friends. We had seats at the Nationals ballpark that were next to each other. We watched a lot of baseball games together. Tim was a remarkable figure. He really had carved out a special place in television journalism. I always felt like whenever I scooped him or I got a guest that he didn’t get and wanted, that I’d hit a home run off the best pitcher in the league, because he was just very good at what he did. Tom [Brokaw] has stepped in, and he’s doing a very, very good job. But as far as getting the guests, the competition is just as tough as it always was, maybe even a little more so now, because NBC is sort of working even harder because Tim’s gone.

You’ll never replace Tim Russert. You’ll find someone to come after him eventually, but he was sort of unique. I said they’ll need five people to replace him, because you need someone to run the Washington bureau — they’ve found that person — but you need someone to moderate Meet the Press, and then to do the analysis for the early morning shows, and Nightly News, and cable. He was just everywhere, so he’ll be a hard person to replace.

Do you have any thoughts as to who should fill Russert’s moderator seat permanently? Might a panel of hosts be a wiser choice than a single moderator?
I’m going to leave that to NBC to figure that out. Who knows, I might come up with an idea so good it would hurt me at Face the Nation if I told them!

It’s been nearly two years since your last day as CBS Evening News anchor. With much so buzz surrounding Katie Couric’s tenure at the broadcast, have you been asked to be on stand-by for the main anchor job — either to fill in or as permanent anchor? Are you interested in returning to that chair?
No, I have not been asked. As far as I know, Katie’s going to be at CBS for the future, and I wouldn’t expect to be asked to [anchor] again. And I would have real reservations about doing it again. I really enjoyed doing it, for that year and a half that I did it — I felt like it all came out well. I think I’m just going to kind of leave that part at that.

It’s been a tough time of late for CBS News, ratings-wise. Why do you think that is, and what can the network do to turn things around?
I think that we just have to keep concentrating on the news. We have to put the news first, and I think we’re doing a good job, and that’s about all you can do. You put together the best newscast that you can and hope people will watch it. In the long run, if you do that, eventually it pays off. Sometimes that takes a long time.

We all worry about the ratings — the ratings are important — but in the end, the only way you can have an impact on the ratings is to put together a good newscast and make sure people know that you’re doing that. If you do, eventually it pays off, I think.

Your new book, Bob Schieffer’s America, comes out in September. It features many of your Face the Nation commentaries, plus new material you call “commentaries on my commentaries.” What motivated you to do this book, and how do you balance your commentary work with your main role as a journalist?
The book is a collection of my commentaries. The way you separate them is you label them commentary, and people know that’s my opinion. In a way, it’s almost like disclosure. People will have an idea of what my opinion is on certain things. I don’t endorse partisan causes, I obviously don’t endorse presidential candidates — I just don’t do that sort of thing. These are just general observations, my thoughts on the issues of the day, and they’re clearly labeled as such. And that’s basically how I do it.

You’ve been very public about recent health problems, specifically your battle with bladder cancer in 2003 [Schieffer’s been declared cancer-free now], life as a diabetic [after being diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in 2001], and having ulcerative colitis. Was that a difficult decision, to be this open about your health?
Yes, it was in the beginning, and I’ve never talked much about my health problems. But when I developed bladder cancer, Hamilton Jordan, who was Jimmy Carter’s chief of staff… he died this year [of cancer]… Hamilton spent his life trying to help other people who had cancer. And when I had it, he called me and said, “You can really help other people if you’ll talk about this.” And I was very reluctant to do it.

But at his urging, I decided to do that, and I was just overwhelmed from the response — I mean, the emails, especially on the bladder cancer, that said “I didn’t realize I had the symptoms until I heard you talk about it.” Or, “It just made me feel better to know someone else has gone through this.” In many ways, for me personally, it’s one of the most rewarding things that I’ve ever done. And it took very little effort on my part to just simply talk about it and be open about it.

It’s very interesting: bladder cancer and ulcerative colitis are both what we kind of call ‘below-the-belt’ diseases — people are reluctant to talk about them, for the obvious reasons. And that’s why I think it is very important for those of us who have experienced this, to talk about it. The only real symptom for bladder cancer is blood in your urine. And people don’t like to talk about that. Especially men, when they see this a lot of times, they think they may have strained themselves, or they ignore it — men are reluctant to go to do the doctor. And you simply have to go to the doctor immediately when you find out about this. So I just kind of felt like it was my duty, as it were, to [be open about it], and so I have. And I must say, I’m really glad that I have.

CBS News has a tradition of its anchors hailing from Texas — Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather and you all grew up in the Lone Star state. Was there something in the water? How do your Texan roots affect your perspective and your work?
Being from Texas is sort of like an ethnic type of thing! We feel like we’re part of a particular group. I think it’s probably fair to say that we’re generally smarter [laughing]. That may have something to do with it… But I’ll tell you what also may have something to do it: in the early days, in the cowboy days, cowboys were out there all by themselves, out there with their cattle, and when they would finally run into a stranger, they had somebody to talk to! Storytelling — tall tales — became a great Texas tradition, so there may be some of that in our DNA, that may be the reason you see so many of these broadcast journalists come out of Texas, I really don’t know.

It is a fun thing. People from Texas, they like you to know they’re from Texas. Just like I guess, people from Boston, they’re very proud of that. Or people from San Francisco. There are just certain places around the country where people who from there are not bashful about telling you about it.

How are things on the Honky Tonk Confidential [Schieffer’s country music band] front?
They’re great! We were down at TCU [Texas Christian University], which is my alma mater — we had the TCU symphony orchestra, the TCU jazz band, the TCU kettle drum band, and Honky Tonk Confidential, all there, under one big tent, to kick off the school’s capital fund drive campaign. I wrote a new song just for the occasion. It was actually just kind of a Texas geography lesson, and how we teach geography at the Schieffer School of Journalism. The first thing we try to tell people is that it is the ‘Ft. Worth/Dallas’ area, not the ‘Dallas/Ft. Worth’ area [Schieffer is a Fort Worth native, and TCU is in Ft. Worth]. I wrote a little song — it went:

Dallas, Dallas, how we love ya,
So why is our airport DFW?
Move that D,
Shift that letter,
‘Ft. Worth-Dallas’ is so much better!

And since it was kind of a Ft. Worth-oriented audience, it was a real hit, I have to tell you!

Looking back at your career, what are you most proud of?
What I am most proud of is that I have just managed to hang in there. I just feel like I’m somehow blessed. If my career ended tomorrow, I wouldn’t feel shortchanged, because this is what I wanted to do when I was a little boy. I’m one of the lucky people who got to do what he wanted to do as a little boy.

It’s just that I got to go, and see, and interview, and be around all these news events that have happened at this particular point in our history. I’m just proud I was able to stay around and get to see and do so much. The honor that I’m most proud of is when TCU named the journalism school for me. To me, that was the thing that I felt the happiest about. I think it’s probably undeserved. But having said that, I’m still very proud of it.

Alissa Krinsky is a contributor for TVNewser