InsideMobileApps InsideSocialGames 10,000 Words FishbowlNY FishbowlDC LostRemote TVNewser TVSpy AgencySpy PRNewser MediaJobsDaily UnBeige

Antitrust Law Professor on Apple Case: ‘The damage awards should serve as a sufficient deterrent’

How much regulatory control should Apple receive in the eBook price fixing case?

Boston University School of Law professor Keith Hylton, the co-authored Laws of Creation: Property Rights in the World of Ideas, thought damages alone should be sufficient. He explained in a statement:

The bans and the monitor are probably unnecessary. Apple will have to pay damages, unless it is successful on appeal. The damage awards should serve as a sufficient deterrent. The monitor, an increasingly popular remedy, converts the Sherman Act into a regulatory statute, which is not its original purpose.

Department of Justice proposed a strict set of controls today. These included a forced change in Apple’s in-app purchasing policies and a two-year ban from “entering into agreements with suppliers of e-books, music, movies, television shows or other content that are likely to increase the prices at which Apple’s competitor retailers may sell that content.”

 

Mediabistro Course

Content Marketing 101

Content Marketing 101Starting September 8, get hands-on content marketing training in Content Marketing 101! Through a series of webcasts, content and marketing experts will teach you the best practices for creating, distributing and measuring the results of your brand's content, including how to develop a content marketing plan, become a content marketer, and more. Register now!