InsideMobileApps InsideSocialGames 10,000 Words FishbowlNY FishbowlDC LostRemote TVNewser TVSpy AgencySpy PRNewser MediaJobsDaily UnBeige

Antitrust Law Professor on Apple Case: ‘The damage awards should serve as a sufficient deterrent’

How much regulatory control should Apple receive in the eBook price fixing case?

Boston University School of Law professor Keith Hylton, the co-authored Laws of Creation: Property Rights in the World of Ideas, thought damages alone should be sufficient. He explained in a statement:

The bans and the monitor are probably unnecessary. Apple will have to pay damages, unless it is successful on appeal. The damage awards should serve as a sufficient deterrent. The monitor, an increasingly popular remedy, converts the Sherman Act into a regulatory statute, which is not its original purpose.

Department of Justice proposed a strict set of controls today. These included a forced change in Apple’s in-app purchasing policies and a two-year ban from “entering into agreements with suppliers of e-books, music, movies, television shows or other content that are likely to increase the prices at which Apple’s competitor retailers may sell that content.”

 

Mediabistro Course

The Art of the Book Review

The Art of the Book ReviewStarting August 4, learn how to get paid to write reviews that will influence the publishing landscape! Taught by a Publishers Weekly book critic, you'll learn how to recommend a book to its audience, write reviews of varying lengths, tailor a review to a specific publication and more! You'll leave this course with two original reviews and a list of paying markets for book reviews. Register now!