The bigger picture in Rowling vs. RDR is not just the publication of material generated by fans of an author’s work, but the issue of Fair Use.
Co-counsel Julie Ahrens, associate director of the Fair Use Project explains that “Fair use protects scholars’ rights to create such companion guides [like the Harry Potter Lexicon]. It simply is not the case that authors can exploit copyright law to prevent analysis and commentary on their work.” If Warner and Rowling win, it could set a dangerous precedent for authors to invoke copyright infringement on any work, from reviews to companion guides that they don’t agree with. Just imagine the New York Times being sued for a negative review because it cites material contained within a novel, and the author wants to be compensated for loss of revenue because of it. It’s a 1984 double plus good scenario, but stranger things have happened.
Quidsi Inc. - Amazon is looking for a Amazon/Quidsi, Content Marketing Manager-Books, Toys, & Activities. next job Developmental Studies Center is looking for a Production Manager. next job The College Board is looking for a Associate Direct/APCurricular Development Editor. next job HarperCollins Publishers is looking for a Director of Consumer Insights. see all
Starting December 2, learn how to prepare and submit illustrations for publication! In this course, you'll learn how to pitch your ideas to new publications, approach book publishers with your illustrations, put together a picture book dummy, and start your own illustrated blog. Register now!