The bigger picture in Rowling vs. RDR is not just the publication of material generated by fans of an author’s work, but the issue of Fair Use.
Co-counsel Julie Ahrens, associate director of the Fair Use Project explains that “Fair use protects scholars’ rights to create such companion guides [like the Harry Potter Lexicon]. It simply is not the case that authors can exploit copyright law to prevent analysis and commentary on their work.” If Warner and Rowling win, it could set a dangerous precedent for authors to invoke copyright infringement on any work, from reviews to companion guides that they don’t agree with. Just imagine the New York Times being sued for a negative review because it cites material contained within a novel, and the author wants to be compensated for loss of revenue because of it. It’s a 1984 double plus good scenario, but stranger things have happened.
John Wiley & Sons Inc. is looking for a Sales Account Manager. next job Klutz is looking for a Marketing Manager, Digital. next job Random House U.S.A is looking for a Imprint Sales Manager - RHPS. next job Smithsonian Books is looking for a Editorial Internship, Smithsonian Books. next job Random House U.S.A is looking for a Royalty Audit Accountant. next job Business Insurance is looking for a Reporter. next job Cavendish Square Publishing is looking for a Production Editor. next job Perseus Books Group (Special Sales Assistant) is looking for a SPECIAL SALES ASSISTANT, GIFT SALES. see all
Starting September 23, work with the contributing editor at ELLE.com to get your writing published in fashion magazines and websites! In this course, you'll learn how to write fashion headlines, runway reviews, and fashion features, write compelling pitch letters, and gain insight into the fashion industry. Register now!