TVSpy LostRemote AgencySpy PRNewser FishbowlNY FishbowlDC SocialTimes AllFacebook 10,000 Words GalleyCat UnBeige MediaJobsDaily
KGW is looking for a News Producer. next job Bloomberg LP is looking for a Senior Producer. next job WKOW TV is looking for a News Director. next job Vidicom is looking for a TV News Writer. next job NBCUniversal is looking for a Producer, WVIT. next job WTKR/WGNT TV is looking for a News Producer. next job KOB - TV is looking for a Morning Executive Producer. next job WPIX11 is looking for a Line Producer. see all

Baby-Naming Hoax Tricks TV News

Another week, another hoax that was reported uncritically by dozens of news outlets. You may have heard in recent weeks about a woman who was offering to name her baby based on an online poll in exchange for $5,000. It now turns out that the woman is an actress, and the website that hosted the poll drummed up the idea as a publicity stunt.

CNN, NBC’s “Today,” Fox News and dozens and dozens of other outlets all reported the story as true.

Last week it was revealed that a fake “viral video” of a pig rescuing a goat that made the TV rounds was actually created for a Comedy Central Show. Early this year it was revealed that Notre Dame football star Manti T’eo’s girlfriend did not exist, despite long profiles of the star that mentioned her. Hoaxes are apparently in vogue now.

It is unrealistic to expect TV producers or bookers to catch every single hoax, especially when people are pushing it and deliberately trying to deceive. Working in TV is a grind, and staffers work long hours to fill endless minutes of airtime. Most of the people producers deal with are straight shooters, or at least not deliberately lying to them, but when you have liars, there is only so much you can do. In the case of the baby-naming hoax: the website was real, and was pushing it. The woman was an actress playing along. It sounded crazy, but people have actually, really named their babies off of Internet suggestions, so it wasn’t that crazy.

In other words, while it is tempting to chastise news outlets for going along with the hoax, in this case they deserve a pass. The website took advantage of the goodwill of the reporters and lied to news outlets to get free publicity. It worked, but they will have a hard time recovering from this mess.

The fake viral video should have set off red flags, and there was action that could have been taken (who posted the video? Why not talk to them?) but this case is different. It was a story that probably should have been approached more skeptically, but one side was lying and obfuscating, so it wasn’t a fair fight.

Mediabistro Course

Get $25 OFF Podcasting

PodcastingStarting July 31, learn how to develop and create your own podcast in just a a matter of weeks! In this course you'll learn how to determine the goals of your podcast, pinpoint your concept, contact and book guests, distribute and market your podcast and more. Get $25 OFF with code CLASS25. Register now!